CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Efficient Joining and Leaving for Receiver Driven Multicast Congestion Control

by Karan Singh, Rama Shankar Yadav
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 1 - Number 26
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Karan Singh, Rama Shankar Yadav
10.5120/471-777

Karan Singh, Rama Shankar Yadav . Efficient Joining and Leaving for Receiver Driven Multicast Congestion Control. International Journal of Computer Applications. 1, 26 ( February 2010), 110-116. DOI=10.5120/471-777

@article{ 10.5120/471-777,
author = { Karan Singh, Rama Shankar Yadav },
title = { Efficient Joining and Leaving for Receiver Driven Multicast Congestion Control },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2010 },
volume = { 1 },
number = { 26 },
month = { February },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 110-116 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume1/number26/471-777/ },
doi = { 10.5120/471-777 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:48:57.085953+05:30
%A Karan Singh
%A Rama Shankar Yadav
%T Efficient Joining and Leaving for Receiver Driven Multicast Congestion Control
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 1
%N 26
%P 110-116
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Multimedia applications such as video conferencing, multiparty video games, military applications news feeds, video-audio transmission and IP TV etc. are today and next generation demand in our life. Multicast communication is better than broadcast and unicast as communication scheme to handle above stated application. Multicast is one to group communication whereas every one knows the multicast group address and uses the UDP protocol. So, it suffers with flooding or congestion problem. Many research groups have proposed the mechanism to control the congestion in multicast. The congestion control schemes are based on source driven, receiver driven and hybrid. Our proposed work is receiver driven approach and we are providing efficient joining and leaving scheme for multicast congestion control which is based on adaptive throughput. In this scheme, we are going to proposed multiple layered joining and leaving approach whereas leaving decision is based on adaptive deaf concept. We have analysis the simulation results using NS-2 which show that performance and packet loss of purposed approach are better than existing approach.

References
  1. C. Yang and A. V. S. Reddy.: A Taxonomy for Congestion Control Algorithms in Packet Switching NetworksIEEE Network, vol 5, pg.34-4, 1995.
  2. Congestion Control in Computer Networks: Issues and Trends, IEEE Network Magazine, pg.24-30, May 1990.
  3. Cote, G., Erol, B., Gallant, M. and Kossentini, F., H.263+.: Video Coding at Low Bit Rates, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 8(7), Nov. 1998, 849-866.
  4. D.S. Yin, Y.H. Liu, et al..: "A new TCPfriendly congestion control protocol for layered multicast", in proc. IASTED conference on Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications, Innsbruck, Austria, Feb. 2006.
  5. G. Kwon and J. Byers, “Smooth multirate multicast congestion control,” Technical Report BU-CS-TR-2002-025, Boston Univ. 2002.
  6. J. Byers, M. Frumin, et al., "FLID-DL: congestion control for layered multicast", in Proc. NGC2000, Palo Alto, USA, pp.71-81, Nov.2000
  7. Karan Singh with Rama Shankar Yadav“A SURVEY ON MULTICAST CONGESTION CONTROL” Proceedings of Third Innovative Conference on Embedded Systems, Mobile Communication and Computing (ICEMC2), pp 186-197, August, 2008
  8. Kulatunga, Fairhurst “TFMCC Protocol Behaviour in Satellite Multicast with Variable Return Path Delays” IEEE 2006.
  9. Legout, A., Biersack, E. W.: PLM: Fast Convergence for Cumulative Layered Multicastb Layered Multicast ransmission. Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS, June 2000
  10. McCanne S., Jacobson V., and Vetterli M.: Receiver-driven layered multicast, Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, pp.117-130, August 1996, New York, USA.
  11. ns2: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
  12. Qian Zhang, Quji Guo, Qiang Ni, Wenwu Zhu, and Ya-Qin Zhang, Source adaptive multi-layered multicast algorithms for real-time video distribution, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol.8, no.6. pp.720-733, 2006.
  13. Sisalem, Wolisz “MLDA: A TCP-friendly Congestion Control Framework for Heterogeneous Multicast Environments” IEEE 2000.
  14. Stian Johansen, Anna N. Kim, Andrew Perkis.:“Quality Incentive Assisted Congestion Control for Receiver-Driven Multicast” IEEE Communications Society ICC 2007.
  15. W. Kammoun, H. Youssef “An adaptive Mechanism for End-to-End Multirate Multicast Congestion Control”in proceeding of The Third International Conference on Digital Telecommunications pp 88-93, 2008.
  16. Li, B., Liu, J.: Multirate video Multicast over the Internet: An Overview. IEEE Network. January/February 2003.
  17. B. Fenner et. Al. “Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP)” Request for Comments 4605, August 2006.
  18. Deering. S.: Multicasting Routing in Internetwork and Extended LANs, SIGCOMM Summer 1988 Proceeding, Aug 1988.
  19. Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol, Request for Comments 1075, November 1988.
  20. S. E. Deering et. Al.: “Host extensions for IP multicasting”, Request for Comments 988, July, 1986.
  21. J. Widmer and M. Handley, “Extending equation basedcongestion control to multicast applications,” in Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM ’01.
  22. L. Rizzo. “A TCP-friendly single-rate multicast congestion control scheme”, in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, pp.17 – 28,Stockholm, Sweden, August 2000.
  23. S. Floyd, M. Handley, J. Padhye, and J. Widmer “Equationbased congestion control for unicast applications” in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, pages 43 – 56, Stockholm, Sweden, Aug. 2000.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Congestion IP multicast IGMP Multicast Multicast Routing