CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Comparative Study of AODV, DSDV and DSR Protocol under various Network Sizes

by Meena Kumari, Shyam Singh Rajput
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 147 - Number 13
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Meena Kumari, Shyam Singh Rajput
10.5120/ijca2016911050

Meena Kumari, Shyam Singh Rajput . Comparative Study of AODV, DSDV and DSR Protocol under various Network Sizes. International Journal of Computer Applications. 147, 13 ( Aug 2016), 1-6. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016911050

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016911050,
author = { Meena Kumari, Shyam Singh Rajput },
title = { Comparative Study of AODV, DSDV and DSR Protocol under various Network Sizes },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Aug 2016 },
volume = { 147 },
number = { 13 },
month = { Aug },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-6 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume147/number13/25710-2016911050/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016911050 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:51:48.724400+05:30
%A Meena Kumari
%A Shyam Singh Rajput
%T Comparative Study of AODV, DSDV and DSR Protocol under various Network Sizes
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 147
%N 13
%P 1-6
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

MANET stands for mobile ad-hoc network, it consists of mobile devices which are free to move arbitrary, and here inter-node connectivity may change frequently during normal operation. It has dynamic topology and no fixed infrastructure. Here all Network activities are executed by node themselves. It is widely used in military Battle field, sensor networks (to monitor environmental condition over large area), Vehicular ad hoc network, emergency operation (for disaster relief etc). There are certain limitation using MANET i.e. it has dynamic topology, limited security for data, limited bandwidth and routing problems. The main objective of this work is to compare and analyses the performance of routing protocols (AODV, DSDV and DSR) in terms of throughput rate, good-put, average End to End delay, packet drop, number of packets Send and number of packet received. The major goal of this study is to analyze the performance of well known MANETs routing protocol in case under low, medium and high density scenario. We find that the performance varies widely across different network sizes and results from one scenario cannot be applied to those from the other scenario. AODV performance is the best considering its ability to maintain connection by periodic exchange of information. As far as Throughput is concerned, AODV and DSR perform better than the DSDV even when the network has a large number of nodes. Overall, our simulation work shows that AODV performs better in a network with a larger number of nodes whereas DSR performs better when the number of nodes is small

References
  1. Alba E, Dorronsoro B, Luna F, Nebro A, Bouvry P, and Hogie L. A Cellular MOGA for Optimal Broadcasting Strategy in Metropolitan MANETs, Computer Communications 2007; 30:p.685 – 697.
  2. S. Chakrabarti and A. Mishra, “Qos issues in ad hoc wireless network,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 142-148, 2001.
  3. Toutouh J, Garcia-Nieto J and Alba E. Intelligent OLSR Routing Protocol Optimization for VANETs, in IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technolog 2012; 61:p.1884 – 1894.
  4. Garc a-Nieto, Toutouh J, and Alba E. Automatic Parameter Tunning with Metaheuristics of the AODV Routing Protocol for Vehicular Adhoc Networks, EvoApplications, part II. LNCS 6025; 2010; p.21-30.
  5. B. Xu, S. Hischke, and B. Walke, “The role of ad hoc networking in future wireless communications,” in Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Communication Technology(ICCT), vol. 2, pp. 1353-1358, 2003.
  6. Shokrani H and Jabbehdari S. A novel ant-based QoS routing for mobile ad hoc networks, Proceedings of the first inter- national conferenceon Ubiquitous and future network . Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press; 2009; p.79–82.
  7. S. Kalwar, “Introduction to reactive protocol,” IEEE Potentials, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 34-35, 2010
  8. E. H. T. Issariyakul, “Introduction to Network Simulator NS2,” Springer Science and Business Media, NY, USA, 2009
  9. The Network Simulator Project - Ns-2, online http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.
  10. D K Lobiyal, C P Katti, and A K Giri, “Parameter Value Optimization of Ad-hoc On Demand Multipath Distance Vector Routing using Particle Swarm Optimization” in Proc. of ELSEVIER International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies (ICICT 2014), Procedia Computer Science 46 ( 2015 ) pp.151 – 158
  11. S. K. Sarkar, T. Basavaraju, and C. Puttamadappa, “Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks: Principles, Protocols and Applications,” Auerbach Publications, MA, USA, 2007.
  12. K. V Arya and S. S. Rajput, “Securing AODV Routing Protocol in MANET using NMAC with HBKS technique,” in Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on SPIN, pp. 281-285, 2014
  13. S. S. Rajput et al., “Securing ZRP Routing Protocol in MANET using Authentication technique,” in Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on CICN, pp. 872-877, 2014
  14. J. -H. Song, V W. Wong, and V C. Leung, “Efficient on-demand routing for mobile ad hoc wireless access networks,” IEEE Transactions on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1374-1383, 2004.
  15. S. S. Rajput et al., “Performance comparision of AODV and AODVDOR routing protocol in MANET,” International Journal of Computer Applications (IJCA),vo 63, no 22, pp. 19-24, 2013
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANET AODV DSDV DSR Routing Protocol NS2 Throughput good-put packet delivery ratio