CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

AZ Model for Software Development

by Ahmed Mateen, Muhammad Azeem Akbar, Mohammad Shafiq
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 151 - Number 6
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Ahmed Mateen, Muhammad Azeem Akbar, Mohammad Shafiq
10.5120/ijca2016911701

Ahmed Mateen, Muhammad Azeem Akbar, Mohammad Shafiq . AZ Model for Software Development. International Journal of Computer Applications. 151, 6 ( Oct 2016), 33-36. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016911701

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016911701,
author = { Ahmed Mateen, Muhammad Azeem Akbar, Mohammad Shafiq },
title = { AZ Model for Software Development },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Oct 2016 },
volume = { 151 },
number = { 6 },
month = { Oct },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 33-36 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume151/number6/26241-2016911701/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016911701 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:56:25.741624+05:30
%A Ahmed Mateen
%A Muhammad Azeem Akbar
%A Mohammad Shafiq
%T AZ Model for Software Development
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 151
%N 6
%P 33-36
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Know a day’s Computer system become essential and it is most commonly used in every field of life. The computer saves time and use to solve complex and extensive problem quickly in an efficient way. For this purpose, software programs are develop to facilitate the works for administrator, offices, banks etc. so Quality is the most important factor as it mostly defines CUSTOMER SATISFACTION which directly related to success of the project, so there are many approaches (methodologies) have been developed for this purpose occasionally. The main study of this paper is to propose a new methodology for the development of the software which focuses on the quality improvement of all kind of product. This study will also discuss the features and limitation of the traditional methodologies like water-fall, iterative, spiral, RUP and Agile and show how the new innovative methodology is better than previous one.

References
  1. Munassar, N. M. A. and Govardhan, A. 2010. A Comparison between Five Models of Software Engineering. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 7, Issue 5, pp: 94-101, September 2010.
  2. Bassil Y. 2012. A simulation model for the waterfall software development life cycle. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 2(5): 1-7.
  3. Majumdar A., Masiwal, G. and Chawan, P. M. 2012. Analysis of Various Software Process Models, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2012, pp: 2015-2021.
  4. Munassar, N. and Govardhan, A. 2010. A Comparison Between Five Models Of Software Engineering, IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, vol. 7, no. 5, 2010.
  5. Ian Sommerville, 2010. Software Engineering, Addison Wesley, 9th ed.
  6. Hurst, J. 2014. Comparing Software Development Life Cycles, SANNS Software Security.
  7. Taya, S. and Gupta, S. 2011. Comparative Analysis of Software Development Life Cycle Models, IJCST Vol. 2, Issue 4, Oct.-Dec. 2011.
  8. Martin J. 1992. Rapid Application Development Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
  9. Rational Software Corporation, 2001. Rational Unified Process, Version 2001.3, CD-ROM, Rational Software, Cupertino, Calif.
  10. Rational Software Corporation, 1998. Rational Unified Process Best Practices for Software Development Teams, White Paper, http://www.rational.com/media/white papers/rup_bestpractices.pdf
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Software process model high quality product innovative methodology Traditional Development Models propose Model.