CFP last date
22 April 2024
Call for Paper
May Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming May edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 22 April 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

A Performance Study of Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols using Qualnet Simulator

by Subramanya Bhat.M, Shwetha.D, Devaraju.J.T
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 28 - Number 5
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: Subramanya Bhat.M, Shwetha.D, Devaraju.J.T
10.5120/3385-4696

Subramanya Bhat.M, Shwetha.D, Devaraju.J.T . A Performance Study of Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols using Qualnet Simulator. International Journal of Computer Applications. 28, 5 ( August 2011), 10-17. DOI=10.5120/3385-4696

@article{ 10.5120/3385-4696,
author = { Subramanya Bhat.M, Shwetha.D, Devaraju.J.T },
title = { A Performance Study of Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols using Qualnet Simulator },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2011 },
volume = { 28 },
number = { 5 },
month = { August },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 10-17 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume28/number5/3385-4696/ },
doi = { 10.5120/3385-4696 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:13:57.195207+05:30
%A Subramanya Bhat.M
%A Shwetha.D
%A Devaraju.J.T
%T A Performance Study of Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols using Qualnet Simulator
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 28
%N 5
%P 10-17
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The advancement in information technology and the need for large-scale communication infrastructures has triggered the era of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). Mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) is a network of wireless mobile nodes which communicate with each other without any centralized control or established infrastructure. Routing is the process of selecting paths in a network along which data is to be sent. Routing is a critical task in MANET where the nodes are mobile. Dynamic and reliable routing protocols are required in the ad-hoc wireless networks, as they have no infrastructure (base station) and their network topology changes. There are various protocols for handling the routing problem in the ad-hoc wireless network environment. In this paper focus is given on studying the performance evaluation of various routing protocols using Qualnet simulator 5.0.2. The performance of the proactive, reactive and hybrid protocols are analyzed with different node densities for mobile and stationary nodes. The metrics used for the performance evaluation include average jitter, throughput, packet delivery ratio and average end to end delay.

References
  1. LOCCATEC: Low Catastrophic Event -2000-29401, www.loccatec.org
  2. N.Vetrivelan and A.V.Reddy, 2008. “Performance Analysis of Three routing Protocols for Varying MANET Size”, Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists.
  3. M.Uma and G.Padmavathi, 2009. “A Comparative Study and Performance Evaluation of Reactive Quality of Service Routing Protocols in MANETs”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, pp. 223-229
  4. Wireless routing protocols, http://www.wikipedia.com
  5. QualNet Network Simulator; Available: http://www. scalable-networks.com.
  6. E.M.Royer and C.K.Toh, 1999. “A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad-Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks”, IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, 46-55.
  7. Philippe Jaquet, Paul Muhlethaler and Amir Qayyum, 2001. “Optimized Link State Routing Protocol”, IETF Draft, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-manet-olsr-06.txt
  8. Syed Basha Shaik, S. P. Setty, 2010. “Performance Comparison of AODV, DSR and ANODR for Grid Placement Model” International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 8887), Volume 11, No.12, 6-9.
  9. C. E. Perkins and E. M. Royer, 1999. “Ad Hoc On-demand Distance Vector Routing,” In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, New Orleans, LA, 90-100.
  10. Young-Bae Ko and Nitin H. Vaidya, 1998. “Location-aided routing (lar) in mobile ad hoc networks”. Technical report, Department of Computer Science Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3112.
  11. D.Johnson, D.Maltz and Yih, 2003. “Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile AdHoc”, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ draft ietf manet-DSR-09.txt, IETF Internet draft,
  12. SreeRangaRaju and Jitendranath Mungara. 2010. “Performance Evaluation of ZRP over AODV and DSR in Mobile Adhoc Networks Using Qualnet” European Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 45, No.4. 658-674.
  13. A.Boukerche, 2004. “Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks,” Mobile Networks and Applications, Vol. 9, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 333-342.
  14. D.A.Broch, D.B.Maltz,. Johnson, Y-C Hu and J. Jetcheva, 1998. “A Performance Comparison of Multihop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols,” In Proceedings of MOBICOMM.
  15. S. R. Das, R. Castaneda and J. Yan, 1998. “Simulation Based Performance Evaluation of Mobile Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols”, In Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks.
  16. S.R.Das, C.E.Perkins and E. M. Royer, 2000. “Performance Comparison of Two On-Demand Routing Protocols for Ad- Hoc Networks,” In Proceedings of INFOCOM 2000
  17. Hong Jiang, 1994. “Performance Comparison of Three Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37.
  18. J.Broch, D.A.Maltz, David B.Johnson, Y. Hu and J. Jetcheva, 1998. “A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad-hoc Network Routing Protocols”, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MobiCom’98, 25-30.
  19. Boukerche, 2001. “Performance Comparison and Analysis of Ad Hoc Routing Algorithms,” In Proceedings of IPCCC 2001, USA, 171-178.
  20. S.Azad, A.Rahman and F.Anwar, 2007. “A Performance Comparison of Proactive and Reactive Routing Protocols of Mobile Ad-hoc NETwork (MANET)”, Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2(5), 891-896.
  21. QualNet documentation, ”QualNet 5.0 Model Library: Advanced Wireless”; http://www.scalablenetworks.com /products/Qualnet/download.php#docs.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Proactive Reactive Hybrid Performance Evaluation Qualnet End-to-end Delay Throughput Jitter Packets delivery ratio

Powered by PhDFocusTM