CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach for Selecting Effort Estimation Model

by Sumeet Kaur Sehra, Yadwinder Singh Brar, Navdeep Kaur
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 39 - Number 1
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Sumeet Kaur Sehra, Yadwinder Singh Brar, Navdeep Kaur
10.5120/4783-6989

Sumeet Kaur Sehra, Yadwinder Singh Brar, Navdeep Kaur . Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach for Selecting Effort Estimation Model. International Journal of Computer Applications. 39, 1 ( February 2012), 10-17. DOI=10.5120/4783-6989

@article{ 10.5120/4783-6989,
author = { Sumeet Kaur Sehra, Yadwinder Singh Brar, Navdeep Kaur },
title = { Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach for Selecting Effort Estimation Model },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2012 },
volume = { 39 },
number = { 1 },
month = { February },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 10-17 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume39/number1/4783-6989/ },
doi = { 10.5120/4783-6989 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:25:18.073897+05:30
%A Sumeet Kaur Sehra
%A Yadwinder Singh Brar
%A Navdeep Kaur
%T Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach for Selecting Effort Estimation Model
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 39
%N 1
%P 10-17
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Effort Estimation has always been a challenging task for the Project managers. Many researchers have tried to help them by creating different types of models. This has been already proved that none is successful for all types of projects and every type of environment. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been identified as the tool that would help in Multi Criteria Decision Making. Researchers have identified that AHP can be used for the comparison of effort estimation of different models and techniques. But the problem with traditional AHP is its inability to deal with the imprecision and subjectivity in the pairwise comparison process. The motive of this paper is to propose Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process, which can be used to rectify the subjectivity and imprecision of AHP and can be used for selecting the type of Model best suited for estimating the effort for a given problem type or environment. Instead of single crisp value, Fuzzy AHP uses a range of values to incorporate decision maker’s uncertainty. From this range, decision maker can select the value that reflects his confidence and also he can specify his attitude like optimistic, pessimistic or moderate. In this work, the comparison of AHP and Fuzzy AHP is concluded using a case study of selection of effort estimation model.

References
  1. K. Molokken and M. Jorgensen, “A review of surveys on software effort estimation” at ISESE’03 , 2003.
  2. S. McConnell, “Rapid development: taming wild software schedules”, Microsoft Press 1996.
  3. F. J. Heemstra. "Software cost estimation", Information and software technology, Vol. 34, No. 10, 1992, pp. 627-639.
  4. C. Jeganathan, “Developing of fuzzy logic architecture to assess sustainability of the Forest Management” Master thesis, Netherland, 2003.
  5. Schank, R. 1982. Dynamic Memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 95-109.
  6. T. J. Sejnowski and C. R. Rosenberg, ‘NETtalk: A parallel network that learns to read aloud”, Johns Hopkins University Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Technical Report 86/01 (1986).
  7. Narendra and Parthasarathy, “Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 1:4-27, 1990.
  8. Hegazy T. and Moselhi, O. 1994. Analogy-based solution to markup estimation problem. ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 8(1): 72–87.
  9. Juan J. Cuadrado-Gallegoa, b, Pablo Rodríguez-Soriaa, Borja Martín-Herreraa , “Analogies and differences between Machine Learning and Expert based Software Project Effort Estimation”, 2010 11th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing.: 269-276.
  10. Martin Shepperd and Michelle Cartwright. Predicting with sparse data. IEEE Trans. Softw.Eng., 27(11):987–998, 2001.
  11. Roberto Meli. Human factors and analytical models in software estimation: An integration perspective. In Proceedings of the ESCOM-SCOPE 2000, pages 33–40, Munich, Germany, 2000. Shaker Publishing.
  12. T. Menzies, Z. Chen, J. Hihn, K. Lum, „ Selecting Best practices for effort estimation, IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering , Vol 32, No 11. November 2006.
  13. Stam, A. and Silva, A. P. D. (1997),” Stochastic Judgments in the AHP: The Measurement of Rank Reversal Probabilities”. Decision Sciences, 28: 655–688.
  14. George Valiris, Panagiotis Chytas, Michael Glykas, (2005) "Making decisions using the balanced scorecard and the simple multi-attribute rating technique", Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 6 Issue 3, pp.159 – 171
  15. Magne Jørgensen and Barry Boehm, “Viewpoints Software Development Effort Estimation: Formal models or Expert Judgment? ,Software, IEEE 2009 Volume: 26 Issue: 2 PP 14 – 19
  16. K. Moløkken and M. Jørgensen, "Expert Estimation of Web-Development Projects: Are Software Professionals in Technical Roles More Optimistic Than Those in Non-Technical Roles?," Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 10, pp. 7-29, 2005.
  17. Chiou, H.K. and Tzeng, G.H. (2002), “Fuzzy Multicriteria decision making approach to analysis and evaluation of green engineering for industry”, Environmental Management, 30(6): 816-830.
  18. F. Bolger and G. Wright, "Assessing the quality of expert judgment: Issues and Analysis," Decision Support Systems, vol. 11, pp. 1-24, 1994.
  19. Christopher Jarabek,” Expert Judgment in Software Effort Estimation”, Non-peer Reviewed Writings Department of Computer Science University of Calgary
  20. M. Jørgensen, "A Review of Studies on Expert Estimation of Software Development Effort," The Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 70, pp. 37-60, 2004.
  21. B. W. Boehm, Software engineering economics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981.
  22. L. H. Putnam, “A general empirical solution to the macro software sizing and estimating problem”. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-4(4) pp 345-361, 1987.
  23. Wang, L., and T. Raz, “Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on Data Flow Problem," Computers & Industrial Engineering, 20, 355-365, 1991.
  24. Sehra S.K., Sehra S.S., Kaur R.,“A survey of techniques for software project effort estimation” International Conference on Wireless Networks & Embedded Systems (WECON-2009) held on 23-24 October, 2009 at Chitkara Institute of Engineering & Technology, Rajpura,(Punjab), pp. 207-210.
  25. Tanja Gruschke and Magne Jorgensen. Assessing uncertainty of software development effort estimates: The learning from outcome feedback. In METRICS ’05: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS’05), page 4, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society
  26. Alaa Sheta, David Rine and Aladdin Ayesh, “] Development of Software Effort and Schedule Estimation Models Using Soft Computing Techniques”, Evolutionary Computation, 2008. CEC 2008. (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence). June 2008 pp. : 1283 – 1289
  27. J. W. Bailey and V. R. Basili, “A meta model for software development resource expenditure,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 107–115, 1981.
  28. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K., ‘‘Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications’’, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1981
  29. G. C. Roper-Lowe and J. A. Sharp. The analytic hierarchy process and its application to an information technology decision. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(1):49–59, 1990.
  30. T.L. Saaty. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New york, 1980.
  31. Buckley, J.J. 1985. Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.17, 233-247
  32. L. Zadeh: Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8, 338-353, 1965
  33. Bozbura, F. T., Beskese, A., & Kahraman, C. (2007). Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1100-1112. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.006
  34. Cheng, C. H., (1999), “Evaluating Weapon Systems Using Ranking Fuzzy Numbers,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 107, 25-35.
  35. Dubois, D. and H. Prade, (2000), Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets-The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Effort Estimation Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Expert Judgment Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Powered by PhDFocusTM