CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
Reseach Article

Automated Score Evaluation of Unstructured Text using Ontology

by Badar Sami, Huda Yasin, Mohsin Mohammad Yasin
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 39 - Number 18
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Badar Sami, Huda Yasin, Mohsin Mohammad Yasin
10.5120/5079-7345

Badar Sami, Huda Yasin, Mohsin Mohammad Yasin . Automated Score Evaluation of Unstructured Text using Ontology. International Journal of Computer Applications. 39, 18 ( February 2012), 19-22. DOI=10.5120/5079-7345

@article{ 10.5120/5079-7345,
author = { Badar Sami, Huda Yasin, Mohsin Mohammad Yasin },
title = { Automated Score Evaluation of Unstructured Text using Ontology },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2012 },
volume = { 39 },
number = { 18 },
month = { February },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 19-22 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume39/number18/5079-7345/ },
doi = { 10.5120/5079-7345 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:25:16.102457+05:30
%A Badar Sami
%A Huda Yasin
%A Mohsin Mohammad Yasin
%T Automated Score Evaluation of Unstructured Text using Ontology
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 39
%N 18
%P 19-22
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

One of the important endeavors of Computer Science is its dealing with data and performing different responsibilities regarding analysis. In this paper, an ontology based automated score evaluation of unstructured text in the domain of text mining is presented. The use of ontologies in this respect is not old. For this research, we have dealt with different approaches and have also represented those methods which provide less optimized score as compared to our finally opted method. For our experimental work, we have collected real answers of students and then compared them with the model answer. We have found that our ultimate approach gives much more optimized end result as compared to other approaches which were carried out throughout our delve process. Moreover, the efficiency of result depends on the ontologies stored in the dataset.

References
  1. Sugato Basu, Raymond J. Mooney, Krupakar V. Pasupuleti, and Joydeep Ghosh, 2011, Evaluating the Novelty of Text-Mined Rules Using Lexical Knowledge, Department of managerial economics, strategy and innovation (msi)
  2. Berry, M. W. (Ed.), 2003, Survey of text mining. New York: Springer
  3. Tom Magerman, Bart Van Looy, Bart Baesens, and Koenraad Debackere, 2011, Assessment of Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) text mining algorithms for large scale mapping of patent and scientific publication documents
  4. Miao Chen and Klaus Zechner, 2011, Computing and Evaluating Syntactic Complexity Features for Automated Scoring of Spontaneous Non-Native Speech, Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 722–731, Portland, Oregon, Association for Computational Linguistics
  5. Elizabeth Dalton, 2002, Beyond Multiple Choice: Computer-Mediated Practices and Assessments to Support Higher-Order Objectives,
  6. D. Perez-Marin, I. Pascual-Nieto, E. Alfonseca and P. Rodriguez, Automatic Identification of Terms for the Generation of Students’ Concept Maps
  7. Raheel Siddiqi and Christopher J. Harrison, 2008, On the automated assessment of short free-text responses, 34th annual conference
  8. Yigal Attali, Don Powers, Marshall Freedman, Marissa Harrison, and Susan Obetz, 2008, Automated Scoring of short-answer open-ended GRE subject test items; ETS GRE research report No. 04-02
  9. Victor Gonzalez-Barbone, Martin Llamas-Nistal, eAssessment of Open Questions: an Educator's Perspective
  10. List of Stop Words. Available at: http://www.lextek.com/manuals/onix/stopwords1.html
  11. Word Net- A large lexical database. Available at: http://wordnet.princeton.edu/
  12. S. Bloehdorn, P. Cimiano, A. Hotho, and S.Staab, 2005, “An Ontology-based Framework for Text Mining”, LDV Forum – GLDV Journal for computational linguistics and language technology, Vol.20, No.1
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Automated score evaluation ontology text data mining unstructured text