CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Comparison of IP, MPLS and MPLS RSVP-TE Networks using OPNET

by O. Akinsipe, F. Goodarzi, M. Li
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 58 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: O. Akinsipe, F. Goodarzi, M. Li
10.5120/9251-3417

O. Akinsipe, F. Goodarzi, M. Li . Comparison of IP, MPLS and MPLS RSVP-TE Networks using OPNET. International Journal of Computer Applications. 58, 2 ( November 2012), 1-3. DOI=10.5120/9251-3417

@article{ 10.5120/9251-3417,
author = { O. Akinsipe, F. Goodarzi, M. Li },
title = { Comparison of IP, MPLS and MPLS RSVP-TE Networks using OPNET },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2012 },
volume = { 58 },
number = { 2 },
month = { November },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-3 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume58/number2/9251-3417/ },
doi = { 10.5120/9251-3417 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:01:28.313586+05:30
%A O. Akinsipe
%A F. Goodarzi
%A M. Li
%T Comparison of IP, MPLS and MPLS RSVP-TE Networks using OPNET
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 58
%N 2
%P 1-3
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The main components of a network are vital to its enhancements by providing reliable services. Different technologies have been put in place to enhance application services in a network. MPLS is one of such technologies and it provides a reliable delivery of application services. It delivers services with low delays, low losses and high speed of transmission. Due to the Traffic Engineering feature of MPLS, it can be used to efficiently utilize network resources as well as implement real-time applications (voice and video). Signalling protocols such as RSVP-TE and CR-LDP are used for Traffic Engineering in MPLS. In this research, the modelling of IP, MPLS and MPLS RSVP-TE (with path reserved for voice traffic) networks are presented and the performance parameters of the networks are compared. OPNET modeler 16. 0 is used to simulate all the networks and the comparison is made for parameters such as throughput, utilization and voice jitter.

References
  1. M. A. Rahman et al. "Performance Analysis of MPLS Protocols over conventional Network," Microwave Conf. , China-Japan Joint, Shanghai, Sept. 2008, pp. 763-766
  2. J. Barakovic et al. "Multimedia Traffic Analysis of MPLS and non-MPLS Network," Multimedia Signal Processing and Communications, 48th Int. Symp. ELMAR-2006, Zadar, Jun. 2006, pp. 285-288.
  3. R. S. Naoum and M. Maswady, "Performance evaluation for VOIP over IP and MPLS," World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal (WCSIT), vol. 2, pp. 110-114, 2012.
  4. N. F. Mir and A. Chien, "Simulation of Voice over MPLS communications Networks," IEEE ICSS conf. , CA, 2002, pp. 389-393.
  5. L. He and P. Botham, "Pure MPLS Technology," in Proc. 3rd International Conf. Availability, Reliability and Security, Barcelona, 2008, pp. 253-259.
  6. X. Xiao et al. "Traffic Engineering with MPLS in the Internet" Global Center Inc. and Michigan State University, USA, vol. 14, pp. 28-33, Mar. 2000.
  7. A. Ghanwani et al. "Traffic Engineering Standards in IP Networks Using MPLS" IEEE Communication Mag. Dec. 1999.
  8. H. M. Asif and M. G. Kaosar, "Performance Comparison of IP, ATM and MPLS Based Network Cores Using OPNET," in 1st IEEE Int. Conf. Industrial and Information Systems, Sri Lanka, Aug. 2006.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

RSVP-TE OPNET simulator