CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Simulation based Analysis of AODV Routing Protocol in Ad Hoc Network under different Mobility and Propagation Loss Models using NS-3

by Vineet Kumar Singh, Rajeev Paulus, Aditi Agrawal, Neelesh Agrawal
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 181 - Number 4
Year of Publication: 2018
Authors: Vineet Kumar Singh, Rajeev Paulus, Aditi Agrawal, Neelesh Agrawal
10.5120/ijca2018917506

Vineet Kumar Singh, Rajeev Paulus, Aditi Agrawal, Neelesh Agrawal . Simulation based Analysis of AODV Routing Protocol in Ad Hoc Network under different Mobility and Propagation Loss Models using NS-3. International Journal of Computer Applications. 181, 4 ( Jul 2018), 22-26. DOI=10.5120/ijca2018917506

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2018917506,
author = { Vineet Kumar Singh, Rajeev Paulus, Aditi Agrawal, Neelesh Agrawal },
title = { Simulation based Analysis of AODV Routing Protocol in Ad Hoc Network under different Mobility and Propagation Loss Models using NS-3 },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jul 2018 },
volume = { 181 },
number = { 4 },
month = { Jul },
year = { 2018 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 22-26 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume181/number4/29704-2018917506/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2018917506 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:05:33.302807+05:30
%A Vineet Kumar Singh
%A Rajeev Paulus
%A Aditi Agrawal
%A Neelesh Agrawal
%T Simulation based Analysis of AODV Routing Protocol in Ad Hoc Network under different Mobility and Propagation Loss Models using NS-3
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 181
%N 4
%P 22-26
%D 2018
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Mobile ad hoc network is an infrastructure-less network, that consist of mobile nodes, with the ability to communicate with each other without any centralized unit. The main features of MANETs are, wireless medium, dynamic topology, distributed cooperation, vulnerable to many security attacks and data loss because of the mobility of nodes. Many routing protocols have been developed for MANET, but ad hoc on Demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing protocol is preferred as the best routing protocol for MANET, because it minimizes the routing overhead more than the other protocols and hence improves the performance of the network. In this article, we have analyzed and evaluated the performance of Nakagami propagation loss model and Friis propagation loss model under different mobility scenario at different speeds to measure the performance parameter such as Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), Throughput and Packet loss, the routing protocol used in are research is AODV. [1][2].

References
  1. Anil Lamba, Dr. Sohan Garg,”A study on the behavior of MANET: Along with research challenges, Application and Security attacks” 2015.
  2. Mr. L. Raja, ”An Overview of MANET: Application, Attacks and Challenges” 2014.
  3. Mr Pranav Kumar Singh ,” Influences of Two ray ground and Nakagami propagation model for the performance of ad hoc routing protocol in VANET “ 2012.
  4. https://www.gaussianwaves.com/2013/09/friss-free-space-propagation-model/
  5. C. Bettstetter, G. Resta, and P. Santi,“The node distribution of the random waypoint mobility model for wireless ad hoc networks” 2003.
  6. Aniket Pramanik, Wasim Arif, Mehedi, Biplav Choudhury, “Behavioral Study of Random Waypoint Mobility based Energy Aware MANET” 2016.
  7. http://epgp.inflibnet.ac.in/epgpdata/uploads/epgp_content/S000305IT/P001487/M022003/ET/1503895868Module30_etext.pdf
  8. Dimpy Grover, Sunil Saini, “A Survey on Unicast Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks” Volume 5, pp. 697-702, 2015.
  9. AODV documents available at URL http://www.olsr.org/docs/report_html/node16.html.
  10. Fan Bai, Ahmed Helmy. “A survey of Mobility Models”.https://www.cise.ufl.edu/~helmy/papers/Survey-Mobility-Chapter-1.pdf.
  11. https://www.nsnam.org/
  12. https://www.nsnam.org/doxygen/classns3_1_1_constant_position_mobility_model.html
  13. I. Chakeres and C. Perkins, Dynamic MANET on demand (DYMO) routing protocol, Internet- Draft Version 06, IETF, October 2006.
  14. A.A Robert, A.X Das, “Comparison of performance Parameters of Reactive, Proactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols in RWP Mobility Model through QualNet”. Journal of Advances in Computer Network, Vol. 1, No. 3, September 2013 JACN 2013 Vol.1(3): 234-237 ISSN: 1793-8244 DOI: 10.7763/JACN.2013.V1.46.
  15. R. Ranjan, A. X Das “Performance Evaluation of FSR, LAR1, and ZRP Routing Protocols in MANET based on RWP Mobility model”. International Journal of computer application (0975-8887, Vol-71 No-3 2013).
  16. R.K Verma, A.X Das “Effective Performance of Location Aided routing protocol on Random walk mobility model with constant bit rate”. International Journal of computer application (0975-8887, Vol- 122, No-14 2015).
  17. C.Singh, A, X Das “Performance of routing protocols in health care scenario”. International Journal of current Engineering and technology. (2277-4106, Vol-4 No-3 2014).
  18. A.K Yadav, A.X Das, “Performance Comparison of MANET Routing Protocols in Battlefield Disaster Management using QualNet 6.1 Simulator”. (2277-4106, Vol-6 No4, 2016).
  19. C. Perkins “Adhoc On Demand Distance Vector Routing rfc”. https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3561.txt. 2003.
  20. Patel Anjali H, Bandana Kumari, Jayavignesh Thyagarajan, “Performance analysis and comparison of various radio propagation models and its impact on routing efficiency” 2016.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

AODV MANET NS3 Friis Propagation Loss Model Nakagami Propagation Loss Model RWP Constant Position Mobility Model.