CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

WHDI vs. WIRELESS HD: 5 GHz based Wireless HDMI its Impacts and Challenges

by Karthik Reddy. G, Tufail Ahmad Zulfi, Kavita Khare
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 74 - Number 16
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Karthik Reddy. G, Tufail Ahmad Zulfi, Kavita Khare
10.5120/12967-9579

Karthik Reddy. G, Tufail Ahmad Zulfi, Kavita Khare . WHDI vs. WIRELESS HD: 5 GHz based Wireless HDMI its Impacts and Challenges. International Journal of Computer Applications. 74, 16 ( July 2013), 6-9. DOI=10.5120/12967-9579

@article{ 10.5120/12967-9579,
author = { Karthik Reddy. G, Tufail Ahmad Zulfi, Kavita Khare },
title = { WHDI vs. WIRELESS HD: 5 GHz based Wireless HDMI its Impacts and Challenges },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { July 2013 },
volume = { 74 },
number = { 16 },
month = { July },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 6-9 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume74/number16/12967-9579/ },
doi = { 10.5120/12967-9579 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:42:26.820356+05:30
%A Karthik Reddy. G
%A Tufail Ahmad Zulfi
%A Kavita Khare
%T WHDI vs. WIRELESS HD: 5 GHz based Wireless HDMI its Impacts and Challenges
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 74
%N 16
%P 6-9
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The nature of wireless video requires a solution which can adapt to changing environmental conditions and support very high data rates. This puts unique requirements on the wireless connection. It must maintain highly-reliable links, provide robustness toward packet errors and interference, deliver visually lossless compression and ensure system performance and cost effectiveness through a low-latency solution. In this paper we compare 5GHz wireless HDMI with 60GHz wireless HD. We propose UWB solution of wireless HDMI in which JPEG2000 and AES 128 encryption-decryption are key techniques to solve the raised technical problems. Initial performance evaluation shows that our approach can achieve high quality video streaming performance.

References
  1. V. Bhaskaran, K. Konstantinides,"Image and Video Compression Standards: Algorithms and Architectures", (online) Massacchusetts: Kluwer,1997, pp. 12-125.
  2. C. Doan, S. Emami, D. A. Sobel, A. M. Niknejad, and R. Brodersen, "Design Considerations for 60GHz CMOS Radios," IEEECommunications Magazine,vol. 42(12), pp. 130-140,Dec. 2004.
  3. Wei Yu,"Motion JPEG2000 in Video Processing", Master's Thesis, Washington University, July 2003.
  4. Rajeev Krishnamurthy, "High Definition, Anywhere: How Ultra Wideband Makes Wireless HDMI Possible",consumer communications and networking, pp. 395-399, Jan. 2007.
  5. Huai-Rong Shao, Chiu Ngo, Harkirat Singh, Sandra Qin, ChangYeulKweon, Guoping Fan, SeongSoo Kim,"Adaptive Multi-beam Transmission of Uncompressed Video over60GHz Wireless Systems",Future Generation Communication and Networking, pp. 430-435, Dec. 2007.
  6. "High-definition multimedia interface specification,"November 2006.
  7. Xilinx Inc. ,"Spartan®-6FPGA User Guide,ug383, V4. 4", December 2009.
  8. XiaoZheng Lu, "Wireless HDMI Technology Overview" case study, Available: www. audioquest. com, May 2007.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

HDMI UWB (ultra wide band) JPEG2000 AES 128 encryption-decryption