CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Performance Analysis of Energy Efficient Clustering Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Network

Published on January 2012 by Naveen Choudhary, Dharm Singh, Shilpa Pandey
Wireless Communication and Mobile Networks
Foundation of Computer Science USA
WCMN - Number 1
January 2012
Authors: Naveen Choudhary, Dharm Singh, Shilpa Pandey
15bbdf39-deb9-4a15-b37a-485279c97acd

Naveen Choudhary, Dharm Singh, Shilpa Pandey . Performance Analysis of Energy Efficient Clustering Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Network. Wireless Communication and Mobile Networks. WCMN, 1 (January 2012), 56-59.

@article{
author = { Naveen Choudhary, Dharm Singh, Shilpa Pandey },
title = { Performance Analysis of Energy Efficient Clustering Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Network },
journal = { Wireless Communication and Mobile Networks },
issue_date = { January 2012 },
volume = { WCMN },
number = { 1 },
month = { January },
year = { 2012 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 56-59 },
numpages = 4,
url = { /specialissues/wcmn/number1/5460-1012/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Special Issue Article
%1 Wireless Communication and Mobile Networks
%A Naveen Choudhary
%A Dharm Singh
%A Shilpa Pandey
%T Performance Analysis of Energy Efficient Clustering Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Network
%J Wireless Communication and Mobile Networks
%@ 0975-8887
%V WCMN
%N 1
%P 56-59
%D 2012
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSN) are emerging in various fields like wildlife monitoring, mining industries, security surveillance. The efficiency of sensor networks strongly depends on the routing protocol used. Routing protocols providing an optimal data transmission route from sensor nodes to sink to save energy of nodes in the network. This paper presents simulation results of existing clustering algorithms for heterogeneous wireless sensor network. The simulation results show how the election criteria for cluster heads election such as random election and nodes with different energy level affect the number of cluster heads elected, and the network lifetime. In this paper, we analyze three different types of routing protocols: LEACH, SEP, and TEEN. Simulation results are provided to show the comparative effectiveness of different clustering algorithm on network lifetime and cluster head selection and failure nodes in the network. Sensor networks are simulated using MATLAB simulator

References
  1. Younis, M., Youssef, M. and Arisha, A. 2003 "Energy- aware management in cluster-based sensor networks", Computer network 43 (5).
  2. Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., Balakrishnan, January 2000 "Energy- efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor network". In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences(HICSS.33)
  3. Dahnil, D.P.; Singh, Y.P.; Chin Kuan Ho; 2010." Analysis of adaptive clustering algorithms in wireless sensor networks", Communication Systems (ICCS), 2010 IEEE International Conference.
  4. Heinzelman,W.R.,Chandrakasan,A. P,,Balakrishnan, H , October 2002."An application- specific protocol archietecture for wireless microsensor networ", IEEE Transactions on wireless communication,1(4):660-670,
  5. Garg Kumkum,"Mobile Computing: Theory and Practice"
  6. O. Younis, M. Krunz, S. Ramasubramanian, 2006. "Node clusturing in wireless sensor network: Recent developments and deployement challenges," IEEE In Newyork, Vol 20, No 3., pp 20-25.
  7. S. George, I. Matta, A. Bestavros. 2004 “SEP: A Stable Election Protocol for clustered heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks”. In Proceedings of Second International Workshop on Sensor and Actuator Network Protocol and Applications (SANPA ), Boston, MA, August.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Wireless sensor network TEEN LEACH SEP energy-efficient network- lifetime.