CFP last date
20 June 2024
Reseach Article

Comparative Analysis of Routing Protocols

by Sahil Thapar, Aishwarya Karnik, Shruti Pawaskar, Poonam Kadam
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 106 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: Sahil Thapar, Aishwarya Karnik, Shruti Pawaskar, Poonam Kadam
10.5120/18550-9806

Sahil Thapar, Aishwarya Karnik, Shruti Pawaskar, Poonam Kadam . Comparative Analysis of Routing Protocols. International Journal of Computer Applications. 106, 9 ( November 2014), 35-40. DOI=10.5120/18550-9806

@article{ 10.5120/18550-9806,
author = { Sahil Thapar, Aishwarya Karnik, Shruti Pawaskar, Poonam Kadam },
title = { Comparative Analysis of Routing Protocols },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2014 },
volume = { 106 },
number = { 9 },
month = { November },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 35-40 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume106/number9/18550-9806/ },
doi = { 10.5120/18550-9806 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:38:58.441303+05:30
%A Sahil Thapar
%A Aishwarya Karnik
%A Shruti Pawaskar
%A Poonam Kadam
%T Comparative Analysis of Routing Protocols
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 106
%N 9
%P 35-40
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

For end to end IP communication just having the forwarding path is not enough, it is necessary to have the reverse path as well to reach the network. If one can reach one host of one network it doesn't mean one can reach all host of that network. For end to end IP communication router should have route to reach all networks. Initially router has only the route to reach directly connected networks. Router can learn the route of the other network by two processes: Statically and Dynamically. In static Routing protocol the best path selection is done by AD value and in dynamic Routing protocol the best path selection is done through Metric Value. Static Routing protocol is used where it is a simple architecture while dynamic routing protocol is used where complexity increases. It is not advisable to use Dynamic Routing Protocol for simple architecture as processing power is high when we make dynamic entries. In this paper we proposed the use of some specified protocols according to the classification. The emphasis of this paper is not to present protocols in detail but to present main features of wide variety of different protocols depending upon their requirements.

References
  1. Esuendale Shewandagn Lemma, Syed Athar Hussain, Wendwossen Worku Anjelo, Performance Comparison of EIGRP/ IS-IS and OSPF/ IS-IS, Blekinge Institute of Technology. November 2009
  2. Rick Graziani, Allan Johnson, Routing Protocols and Concepts. CCNA Exploration Companion Guide, Cisco Press, 800 East 96th Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 U. S. A
  3. Mc-Graw Hill Forouzan Networking Series, Behrouz A. Forouzan DeAnza College, With Sophia Chung Fegan, Data Communications and Networking. Fourth Edition.
  4. A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)
  5. Y. RekhterT. J, Watson Research Center, IBM Corp. T. Licisco Systems ,Editors, March 1995
  6. System and method for routing ISIS traffic through unidirectional links of a computer network, US 7499445 B2 V. Diwedi, www. rst. net
  7. OSPF: anatomy of an Internet routing protocol, John T. Moy, Pearson Education Co-operate sales division, 201 W, 103rd street, Indianapolis, IN46290. ISBN 0-201-63472-4
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

AD Value Metric Value AS Number Cost Process ID LSA Value LSU Value.