CFP last date
20 June 2024
Reseach Article

Mobility Management across Heterogeneous Access Networks

by Fatma A. Al Emam, Mohamed E. Nasr, Ahmed S. Samra
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 106 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: Fatma A. Al Emam, Mohamed E. Nasr, Ahmed S. Samra
10.5120/18552-9814

Fatma A. Al Emam, Mohamed E. Nasr, Ahmed S. Samra . Mobility Management across Heterogeneous Access Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 106, 9 ( November 2014), 54-61. DOI=10.5120/18552-9814

@article{ 10.5120/18552-9814,
author = { Fatma A. Al Emam, Mohamed E. Nasr, Ahmed S. Samra },
title = { Mobility Management across Heterogeneous Access Networks },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2014 },
volume = { 106 },
number = { 9 },
month = { November },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 54-61 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume106/number9/18552-9814/ },
doi = { 10.5120/18552-9814 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:39:00.882382+05:30
%A Fatma A. Al Emam
%A Mohamed E. Nasr
%A Ahmed S. Samra
%T Mobility Management across Heterogeneous Access Networks
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 106
%N 9
%P 54-61
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

To satisfy customer demand for a high mobility services in heterogeneous network; Mobile protocol is needed to make intelligent and optimized handover. This paper is a comparative study between mobility management solutions such as (MIPv6 , NEMO , FHMIP and MIPv6 integrated with IEEE802. 21) in heterogeneous networks to find out which of them performs better when it comes to send datagram from the correspondent node to the mobile node. Different scenarios were carried out to measure delay and throughput metrics of mobile node while roaming using NS2 (Network Simulator 2). The results showed that mobility protocols integrated with IEEE802. 21 performed better in all the tests done and the overall expected handover (both L2 and L3) latency can be reduced even in vehicular environment.

References
  1. John Fitzpatrick, B. "ECHO - A Cross Layer, Terminal Oriented Handover Solution forVoIP". 2008, University College Dublin.
  2. Aldalaty, K. E. "Mobile IP Handover Delay Reduction Using Seamless Handover Architecture". 2009, Blekinge Institute of Technology.
  3. shayma sinan, m. i. "A Comparison of mobile node's Handoff between mobile ipv6 and fast Handover protocol". The Institution of Engineers, Malaysia, 2008, Vol 69 No 2, PP. 27-30.
  4. Payaswini P and Manjaiah D. H. (n. d. ). "Simulation and Performance analysis of Vertical Handoff between WiFi and WiMAX using Media Independent Handover Services". International Journal of Computer Applications, Feb 2014, Vol 87 No 4, PP. 14-20.
  5. Sardar, A. M. (n. d. ). "Efficient Management of Fast Handoff in Wireless Network Mobility (NEMO)". Indian Institute of Management Calcuta, March 2011,WPS No. 671. PP. 1-15.
  6. Karl Andersson, A. Z. "Multihomed Mobile IPv6: OPNET Simulation of Network Selection and Handover Timing in Heterogeneous Networking Environments". Luleå University of Technology, Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Sweden. 2010.
  7. Lin-Huang Chang, "A Handover Mechanism Using IEEE 802. 21 in Heterogeneous 3G and Wireless Networks", Journal of Internet Technology, 2011, Vol 12 No 5, PP. 801-812.
  8. Kong, R. "The Simulation for Network Mobility based on NS2". International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, IEEE, 2008, PP. 1070-1074.
  9. Chitedze, Z. , & Tucker, W. D. "FHMIPv6-based handover for wireless mesh networks". Southern Africa Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (SATNAC 2012), pp. 135–139.
  10. Sheikh, N. Q. "Vertical Handover in Wireless Overlay Networks with Quality of Service Factors". Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, July 2011 Vol II, U. K.
  11. Xavier Perez-Costa. " A Performance Comparison of Mobile IPv6, Hierarchical Mobile IPv6, Fast Handovers for Mobile IPv6 and their Combination". Mobile Computing and Communications Review, Oct 2003, Vol 7, No 4. PP. 5 - 19
  12. Mussabbir, "Mobility Management across Converged IP-based Heterogeneous Access Networks". School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University. July 2010.
  13. Zohra Slimane, M. F. (n. d. ). "Seamless Infrastructure independent Multi Homed NEMO Handoff Using Effective and Timely IEEE 802. 21 MIH triggers". International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks (IJWMN), June 2012, Vol. 4, No. 3. PP. 119-139.
  14. R. D. Sahana Bhosale, "Investigations on IEEE 802. 21 based Media Independent Handoff Algorithm for Access Network Selection between WiFi and WiMAX", International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, , May-2013 ,Vol 4, No 5. PP. 2287-2292.
  15. Damhuis, J. "Seamless handover within WiMAX and between WiMAX and WLAN ". University of Twente, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, 2008.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MIPv6 FHMIPv6 Handover Mobility MIH NEMO