CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Handover Modeling of Multiple States of Mobile Node in a Five Node Network Model

by Suresh R. Halhalli, Subhash Kulkarni, K. S. R. Anjaneyulu
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 111 - Number 3
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Suresh R. Halhalli, Subhash Kulkarni, K. S. R. Anjaneyulu
10.5120/19518-1146

Suresh R. Halhalli, Subhash Kulkarni, K. S. R. Anjaneyulu . Handover Modeling of Multiple States of Mobile Node in a Five Node Network Model. International Journal of Computer Applications. 111, 3 ( February 2015), 16-21. DOI=10.5120/19518-1146

@article{ 10.5120/19518-1146,
author = { Suresh R. Halhalli, Subhash Kulkarni, K. S. R. Anjaneyulu },
title = { Handover Modeling of Multiple States of Mobile Node in a Five Node Network Model },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2015 },
volume = { 111 },
number = { 3 },
month = { February },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 16-21 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume111/number3/19518-1146/ },
doi = { 10.5120/19518-1146 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:46:54.347264+05:30
%A Suresh R. Halhalli
%A Subhash Kulkarni
%A K. S. R. Anjaneyulu
%T Handover Modeling of Multiple States of Mobile Node in a Five Node Network Model
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 111
%N 3
%P 16-21
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In this work, handover probability, unnecessary handover probability, missing handover probability and wrong decision probability are computed for a five node network model. The four states of mobile node, namely Cooperative state, failed state, selfish state and malicious state are also modeled. The simulation results are presented for a case of bandwidths up to 20. Decision time has been varied from 11ms to 15ms. Finally important conclusions are drawn and future work is defined.

References
  1. J. McNair, F. Zhu, "Vertical handoffs in fourth-generation multinetwork environments," IEEE Wireless Communications 11 (3) (2004) 8–15.
  2. A. H. Zahran, B. Liang, and A. Saleh, "Signal threshold adaptation for vertical handoff in heterogeneous wireless networks," Mob. Netw. Appl. , vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 625–640, 2006.
  3. Chuanxiong Guo, Zihua Guo, Qian Zhang, and Wenwu Zhu, "A Seamless and Proactive End-to-End Mobility Solution for Roaming Across Heterogeneous Wireless Networks", IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications,Vol. 22, No. 5, June 2004, pp. 834-848.
  4. W. Zhao, R. Tafazolli, and B. G. Evans, "Internetwork handover performance analysis in a gsm-satellite integrated mobile communication system," Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1657–1671, 1997.
  5. M. N. Halgamuge, H. Le Vu, K. Rarnamohanarao, and M. Zukerman, "Signal-based evaluation of handoff algorithms," Communications Letters, IEEE, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 790–792, 2005.
  6. C. Chi, X. Cai, R. Hao and F. Liu "Modeling and Analysis of Handover Algorithms" IEEE GLOBECOM 2007 proceedings.
  7. S. R. Halhalli, S. Kulkarni, K. S. R. Anjaneyulu, S. Akhila, "Probability Modeling of Multi Node Wireless Networks," International Journal of Computer Applications (IJCA) (0975 – 8887) Volume 51– No. 1, August 2012.
  8. Daniel Heyman and Mattlew Sobe, Stochastic Models in Operations Research, McGraw-Hill, 1982.
  9. G. Pollini, "Trends in handover design," IEEE Commun. Mag. , March, 1996.
  10. K. Pahlavan, P. Krishnamurthy, A. Hatami, M. Ylianttila, J. Makela, R. Pichna, and J. Vallstrom, "Handoff in Hybrid Mobile Data Networks," IEEE Personal Communications, Apr. 2001.
  11. M. Ylianttila, M. Pande, J. Makela, and P. Mahonen, "Optimization scheme for mobile users performing vertical handoffs between IEEE 802. 11 and GPRS/EDGE networks," in Proc. IEEE Globecom'01.
  12. Xiang-Yang Li, Peng-Jun Wan, Yu Wang, and Chih-Wei Yi. Fault Tolerant Deployment and Topology Control in Wireless Networks. In Proc. of ACM MobiHoc '03, pages 117–128, Jan. 2003.
  13. EURESCOM Project P1013-FIT-MIP, "First steps towards UMTS: Mobile IP services, a European test bed", http://www. eurescom. de/public/projects/P1000-series /p1013/ default. asp.
  14. J. McNair, I. Akyildiz, and M. Bender, "An inter-system handoff technique for the IMT-2000 system," in Proc. IEEE infocom 2000.
  15. C. Perkins, Editor, "IP mobility support for IPv4," RFC 3344, http://www. ietf. org/rfc/rfc3344. txt
  16. C. Perkins, et al. , "Mobility support in IPv6," IETF draft, http://www. ietf. org/internet-drafts/draft-ietfmobileip-ipv6-24 . txt, work in progress, June, 2003.
  17. Hao Yang, Haiyun Luo, Fan Ye, Songwu Lu, and Lixia Zhang. Security in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: Challenges and Solutions. IEEE WirelessCommunications, pages 38 – 47, Feb 2004.
  18. A. Valko, "Cellular IP: A New Approach to Internet Host Mobility," Computer and Communication Review, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 50-65, January 1999.
  19. R. Ramjee, et al. "HAWAII: A domain-based approach for supporting mobility in wide-area wireless networks," in Proc. IEEE ICNP, 1999.
  20. F. Xing and W. Wang: Modeling and Analysis of Connectivity in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with Misbehaving Nodes, IEEE ICC 2006 proceeding, IEEE Communications Society.
  21. Patil Shweta and B. N. Manjunatha Reddy, "Modeling and Analysis of Two Node Network Model with Multiple States in Mobile Networks," International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research Volume 3– Issue 1, 52 - 55, 2014
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Wrong Decision Probability Missing Handovers Unnecessary handovers five node network model and multiple states.