The week's pick
Random Articles
Reseach Article
Swift and Energy Efficient Big Data Gathering Approaches in Wireless Sensor Networks
| International Journal of Computer Applications |
| Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA |
| Volume 138 - Number 10 |
| Year of Publication: 2016 |
| Authors: T. Sujithra, R. Venkatesan |
10.5120/ijca2016908947
|
T. Sujithra, R. Venkatesan . Swift and Energy Efficient Big Data Gathering Approaches in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 138, 10 ( March 2016), 14-19. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016908947
Abstract
In Recent studies, mobile element acts as a mechanical carrier equipped with a powerful transceiver and battery. It directly collects the data from the sensors in the sensing environment via single-hop communication when traversing its transmission range and eventually delivers the collected data to the remote central. As a mobile element collects the data from every sensor node, the length of the mobile element tour will be increased. It results in increased data gathering latency. To solve this problem, several algorithms have been proposed. One of them called Toward Energy Efficient Big Data Gathering (TEEBD). Even it simplifies the mobile element data gathering by calculating the optimum number of clusters. Mobile element should wait until all of its cluster members uploads its data. It gives increased data gathering latency, and Packet loss due to buffer flow. In this paper, we propose two novel approaches called Energy Efficient Big Data Gathering using Local data Collector (EEBDG-LC) and Energy Efficient Big Data Gathering using Local data Collector with Threshold (EEBDG-LCWT). First approach concentrates on placing a local data collector in every centroid of the region. In which mobile element collects the information only from local data collector instead of all of its sensor nodes. It increases the speed of mobile element data gathering. The main goal of the second approach is to reduce the traffic in the local sensing region of EEBDG-LC based on the threshold value. In which node reaches the threshold value are only allowed to transmit data to the local data collector. Others go to the sleep mode immediately. Thus, increases the lifetime of the sensor network, and packet delivery ratio. Various data gathering mechanisms such as mobile element data gathering and data gathering using UAV have been used and comparison between these two has been done. The effectiveness of our approach is validated through extensive simulations.
References
- Holger Karl and Andreas Willig, “Protocols and architectures for wireless sensor networks,” John Wiley, England, 2005.
- Kazem sohraby, Daniel Minoli and Taieb Znati, “Wireless Sensor Networks: Technology, Protocols, and Applications,” Wiley Interscience, United States of America, 2007.
- J. Luo, J. Panchard, M. Pi´orkowski, M. Grossglauser, and J.P. Hubaux, “MobiRoute: routing towards a mobile sink for improving lifetime in sensor networks,” In . 2nd IEEE/ACM DCOSS, pp. 480–497, Springer, 2006.
- Guoliang Xing , Tian Wang, Zhihui Xie, and Weijia Jia , ”Rendezvous Planning in Wireless Sensor Networks with Mobile Elements,” In. IEEE transactions on mobile computing, pp. 1430-1443, 2008.
- W. R. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan, “Energy efficient communication protocols for wireless micro sensor networks,” In . Proc. HICSS, pp. 1–10, 2000.
- X. Liu, J. Cao, S. Lai, C. Yang, H. Wu, and Y. Xu, “Energy efficient clustering for WSN based structural health monitoring,” In. Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 2768–2776, 2011.
- Z. Zhang, M. Ma, and Y. Yang, “Energy efficient multi-hop polling in clusters of two-layered heterogeneous sensor networks,” In. IEEE Transtions on Computer, pp. 231–245, 2008.
- T. A. A. Alsbou, M. Hammoudeh, Z. Bandar, and A. Nisbet,“An overview and classification of approaches to information extraction in wireless sensor networks,” In. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications (SENSORCOMM ’11), pp. 255, 2011.
- M. Di Francesco, S. K. Das, and G. Anastasi, “Data collection in wireless sensor networks with mobile elements: a survey,” In. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, pp. 7:1–7:31, 2011.
- A.A. Somasundara, A. Ramamoorthy, M.B. Srivastava, “Mobile element scheduling for efficient data collection in wireless sensor networks with dynamic deadlines,” In. proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS’04), pp. 296–305, 2004.
- Manjeshwar and D. Agrawal, “Teen: A Routing Protocol for Enhanced Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks,” In. IEEE parallel and distributed processing symposium (IPDPS), pp.2009–15, 2001.
- Daisuke Takaishi, Hiroki Nishiyama, Nei Kato and Ryu Miura, “Toward Energy Efficient Big Data Gathering in Densely Distributed Sensor Networks,” In. IEEE Trans. Emerging Topics in Computing, pp. 388-397, 2014.
- Say Sotheara, Kento Aso, Naoto Aomi, and Shigeru Shimamoto, ”Effective Data Gathering and Energy Efficient Communication Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks employing UAV”, In. IEEE WCNC’14, Track 3, 2014.
- Mohamed Hefeeda and Majid Bagheri, “ Forest Fire Modeling and Early Detection using Wireless Sensor Networks,” In. Adhoc & Sensor Wireless Networks, Old City Publishing, pp.169-224 , 2009.
- N. Li, J. Hou, C.Sha, and L. Sha, ”Design and analysis of an MST-based topology control algorithm,” In. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., pp. 1195-1206, 2005.
- N. Christofides, “Worst-case analysis of a new heuristic for the travelling salesman problem,” In. Technical Report 388, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, 1976.
Index Terms
Keywords