CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

SOMREP: Mapped Meta Information (MMI) for Semantic Web using Ontology Mapping Patterns

by S. Chitra, G. Aghila
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 14 - Number 5
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: S. Chitra, G. Aghila
10.5120/1844-2106

S. Chitra, G. Aghila . SOMREP: Mapped Meta Information (MMI) for Semantic Web using Ontology Mapping Patterns. International Journal of Computer Applications. 14, 5 ( January 2011), 1-5. DOI=10.5120/1844-2106

@article{ 10.5120/1844-2106,
author = { S. Chitra, G. Aghila },
title = { SOMREP: Mapped Meta Information (MMI) for Semantic Web using Ontology Mapping Patterns },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { January 2011 },
volume = { 14 },
number = { 5 },
month = { January },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-5 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume14/number5/1844-2106/ },
doi = { 10.5120/1844-2106 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:02:35.102969+05:30
%A S. Chitra
%A G. Aghila
%T SOMREP: Mapped Meta Information (MMI) for Semantic Web using Ontology Mapping Patterns
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 14
%N 5
%P 1-5
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Ontologies are currently emerging as representation techniques for overlapping complimentary context domains. A single ontology is no longer enough to support the tasks predicted by a distributed environment like the Semantic Web. Multiple ontologies need to be accessed from several applications. A system incorporating the semantics either implicitly or explicitly to form a formal specification of ontology mapping is vital to achieve inter-operability between the existing ontologies in both homogenous and heterogeneous environment. As a base for the above purpose, this work describes the various patterns that can be used to find the similarity between ontologies through the components Concepts, Relations, Attributes and Values. These patterns play a major role in the specification of ontology mappings, which in turn reduces the number of errors, makes the mapping more concise and understandable. Concept-to-concept mapping pattern has been implemented and analysis has been done using OAEI benchmark test dataset (Google and Yahoo directories). The results and analysis of the application for scenarios of the mapping patterns also have been discussed.

References
  1. Berners-Lee .T,Hendler .J and Lassila, O., “The Semantic Web”, Scientific American, Vol. 284, No. 5, pp. 34-43, 2001.
  2. Doan, A.; Madhavan, J.; Domingos, P.; Halevy, “A Learning to Map between Ontologies on the Semantic Web”, Proceedings of the Eleventh International WWW Conference, 2002.
  3. Dnyanesh Rajpathak and Enrico Motta, “An Ontological Formalisation of the Planning Task”, Proceedings of the Formal Ontologies in Information Systems, 2004.
  4. C. Fellbaum, “Word Net: An Electronic Lexical Database”, MIT Press, 1998.
  5. Hendrik Thomas, Declan O’ Sullivan, Rob Brennan, “Evaluation of Ontology Mapping Representations”, Knowledge and Data Engineering Group, 2009.
  6. Juanzi Li, Jie Tang, Yi Li and Qiong Luo, “RiMOM: A Dynamic Multistrategy Ontology Alignment Framework”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol: 21, p: 1218-1232, 2009.
  7. Judith Wilde, “Building Vocabulary: Prefixes, Roots, and Suffixes”, Printed: NCELA, 2006.
  8. Klein, M, “Combining and relating ontologies: An Analysis of Problems and Solutions”, Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, 2001.
  9. Ming Mao,”Ontology Mapping: An Information Retrieval and Interactive Activation Network Based Approach”, Springer LNCS 4825, pp. 931–935, 2007.
  10. Namyoun Choi, Il-Yeol Song, and Hyoil Han, “A Survey on Ontology Mapping”, SIGMOD, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2006.
  11. Nelson C.N. Chu, Quang M. Trinh, Kwn E. Barker and Reda S. Alhajj, ”A Dynamic Ontology Mapping Architecture for a Grid Database System”, IEEE Fourth International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grid, p : 343 – 346, 2008.
  12. Ondrej Svab “Exploiting patterns in Ontology Mapping”,6th International and 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, 2008.
  13. Ondrej Svab, Vojtech Svatek and Heiner Stuckenschmidt2, “A Study in Empirical and ‘Casuistic’ Analysis of Ontology Mapping Results”, Springer LNCS, Vol: 4519, p: 655-669, 2007.
  14. PengWang, Baowen Xu, “Debugging Ontology Mappings: A Static Approach”, Computing and Informatics, Vol. 22, p: 1001–1015, 2007.
  15. Ravi Loudrusamy and Gopinath Ganapathy, “Feature Analysis of Ontology Mediation Tools”, Journal of Computer Science, 4(6), p: 437-446, 2008.
  16. Ryutaro Ichise, “Machine Learning Approach for Ontology Mapping using Multiple Concept Similarity Measures”, Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Science, p: 340-346, 2008.
  17. Sofia, H. Martins, J. P.,” A Methodology for Ontology Integration”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Capture, ACM SIGART, 2001.
  18. Xia Wang, Manfred Hauswirth, Tomas Vitvar, and Maciej Zaremba, “Semantic Web Services Selection Improved by Application Ontology with Multiple Concept Relations”, ACM, p: 2237-2242, 2008.
  19. Yannis, K. and S. Marco, “Ontology mapping: The state of the art”, The Knowledge Engineering Review, 18: p: 1-31, 2003.
  20. Yves R. Jean-Marya, E. Patrick Shironoshitaa, Mansur R. Kabuk “Ontology Matching with Semantic Verification” Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the WWW, vol: 7, p: 235-251, 2009.
  21. Zhaohui Wu, Yuxin Mao, and Huajun Chen, “Subontology-Based Resource Management for Web-Based e-Learning “, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 21, p: 867-879, 2009.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Ontology Ontology Mapping Ontology Integration Mapping Patterns