The week's pick
Random Articles
Reseach Article
A new Method for Color Image Quality Assessment
| International Journal of Computer Applications |
| Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA |
| Volume 15 - Number 2 |
| Year of Publication: 2011 |
| Authors: Niveditta Thakur, Swapna Devi |
10.5120/1921-2565
|
Niveditta Thakur, Swapna Devi . A new Method for Color Image Quality Assessment. International Journal of Computer Applications. 15, 2 ( February 2011), 10-17. DOI=10.5120/1921-2565
Abstract
Humans have always seen the world in color. In the last three decades, there has been rapid and enormous transition from grayscale images to color ones. Well-known objective evaluation algorithms for measuring image quality include mean squared error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and human Visual System based one are structural similarity measures and edge based similarity measures. One of the common and major limitations of these objective measures is that they evaluate the quality of grayscale images only and don’t make use of image color information. Since, Color is a powerful descriptor that often simplifies the object identification and extraction from a scene so color information also could influence human beings’ judgments. So, in this paper new objective color image quality measure in spatial domain is proposed that overcomes the limitation of these existing methods significantly, is easy to calculate and applicable to various image processing applications. The proposed quality measure has been designed as a combination of four main factors: luminance similarity, structure correlation, edge similarity, and color similarity. This proposed index is mathematically defined and in it HVS model is explicitly employed. Experiments on various image distortion types indicate that this index performs significantly better than other traditional error summation methods and existing similarity measures.
References
- Thung, Kim-Han, Raveendran, Paramesran. 2009. A survey of image quality measures. In Proceedings of International Conference for Technical Postgraduates (TECHPOS), pp.1-4.
- D. A. Silverstein and J. E. Farrell. 1996. The relationship between image fidelity and image quality. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 881–884.
- B.Girod. 1993. What’s wrong with mean-squared error. In Digital Images and Human Vision (A.B.Watson, ed.), pp. 207-220.
- Z. Wang and A. C. Bovik. 2009. Mean squared error: love it or leave it? - A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 98-117, Jan. 2009.
- Z. Wang and A. C. Bovik. 2002. A universal image quality index,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 9, pp. 81–84.
- Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli. 2004. Image quality assessment: From error measurement to structural similarity,” IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, vol. 13, pp. 600-612.
- Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, and E. P. Simoncelli. 2005. Structural Approaches to Image Quality Assessment. Handbook of Image and Video Processing, 2nd ed., Academic Press, pp. 1-33.
- Ho-Sung Han, Dong-O Kim, Rae-Hong Park. 2009. Structural Information-Based Image Quality Assessment Using LU Factorization. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 165-171.
- Alan C. Brooks, Xiaonan Zhao, and Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas. 2008. Structural Similarity Quality Metrics in a Coding Context: Exploring the Space of Realistic Distortions. IEEE Transactions on image processing, Vol. 17, No. 8, pp.1261-1263.
- Hamid R. Sheikh and Alan C. Bovik. 2006. Image information and visual quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol.15, No.2, pp. 430-444.
- D.J. Granrath. 2005. The role of human visual models in image processing. IEEE Transactions on image processing, Vol. 69, No. 5, pp. 552 – 561.
- Y. Shi, Y. Ding, R. Zhang, Jun Li. 2009. Structure and Hue Similarity for Color Image Quality Assessment. In Proceedings of International Conference on Electronic Computer Technology, pp. 329 – 333.
- W.Fu, G. Xiaodong, Y. Wang. 2008. Image Quality Assessment Using Edge and Contrast Similarity. In Proceedings of International joint conference on Neural Networks, pp.852-855.
- Z. Wang and Alan C. Bovik. 2006. Handbook of Modern Image Quality Assessment, Morgan & Claypool, pp. 1-65.
- Rafael C. Gonzalez and Richards E. Woods. 2006. Digital Image Processing, second edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, pp.304-364.
- N. Ponomarenko, V. Lukin, K. Egiazarian, J. Astola, M. Carli, and F. Battisti. 2008. Color image database for evaluation of image quality metrics. IEEE 10th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, pp.403-408.
Index Terms
Keywords