CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Comparative Study of Throughput in MANET Routing Protocols with Variable Nodes using NS-2

by Purushottam Kewat, Akhilesh Kumar Shrivas
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 152 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Purushottam Kewat, Akhilesh Kumar Shrivas
10.5120/ijca2016911881

Purushottam Kewat, Akhilesh Kumar Shrivas . Comparative Study of Throughput in MANET Routing Protocols with Variable Nodes using NS-2. International Journal of Computer Applications. 152, 10 ( Oct 2016), 38-41. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016911881

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016911881,
author = { Purushottam Kewat, Akhilesh Kumar Shrivas },
title = { Comparative Study of Throughput in MANET Routing Protocols with Variable Nodes using NS-2 },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Oct 2016 },
volume = { 152 },
number = { 10 },
month = { Oct },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 38-41 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume152/number10/26361-2016911881/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016911881 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:57:52.461903+05:30
%A Purushottam Kewat
%A Akhilesh Kumar Shrivas
%T Comparative Study of Throughput in MANET Routing Protocols with Variable Nodes using NS-2
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 152
%N 10
%P 38-41
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is a collecting of wireless moveable nodes dynamically forming a temporary mesh without the aid of any constituted store or centralized body. As in MANET, the network anatomy is changing and often changes, so routing protocols should be fashioned to athletics the obligation of the MANET. It is a determinant division in the action valuation of MANET to select suitable mobility model have been proposed for ad hoc wireless networks based on diametrical scenarios. In this theme, we speculated and equated the action of the routing protocols AODV, DSDV, DSR and OLSR with indicator to varying throughput.

References
  1. Ambhaikar, A., Sharma, H.R. and Mohabey, V.K. 2010. Scalability Performance of MANET Routing Protocols with Reference to Variable Pause Time. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering. 02, 1-5.
  2. Elizabeth, M. Royer, Toh , C. K. 1999. A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks. 46-55.
  3. Parekh, V., and Wandra, K. H. 2013. Effects of Traffic Load and Mobility on AODV, DSR and DSDV Routing Protocols in MANET. 3(1), 467-472.
  4. Garousi, V. 2001. Simulating Network traffic in Multi-hop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks based on DSDV (Destination Sequenced Distance Vector) protocol using NS (Network Simulator) Package, University of Waterloo, Fall.
  5. Das, S. R., and Perkins, C.E. and Royer, E.M. 2000. Performance Comparison of Two on Demand Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies,3, 3-20.
  6. Chao, Chih-Min, Sheu, Jang-Ping, and Cheng Ta Hu. 2003. Energy- Conserving Grid Routing Protocol in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP’03).
  7. Zamam, R. U. 2016. An Efficient DSDV Routing Protocol for Wireless Mobile Ad Hoc Networks and its Performance Comparison. http://www.computer.org/ portal.
  8. Perkins, C.E. and Bhagwat, P. 1994. Highly Dynamic Destination Sequence-Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile Computers. Computer Communication Review, 24(4), 234-245.
  9. Rahman, A., Islam, A., and Talevski, A. 2009. Performance Measurement of Various Routing Protocols in Ad-hoc Network. International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, March 18 - 20.
  10. Khan, K. U., Zaman, R. U., and Reddy, A. V. 2008. Performance Comparison of On-Demand and Table Driven Ad Hoc Routing Protocols using NCTUns . Tenth International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation.
  11. Arun Kumar, Reddy Loknath, Hiremath, P. S. 2008. Performance Comparison of Wireless Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocols. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security,8, 3-6.
  12. Gowrishankar, S. , Basavaraju, T.G. , Singh, M. Subir Kumar Sarkar, S. K. 2010. Scenario based Performance Analysis of AODV and OLSR in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Proceedings of the 24th South East Asia Regional Computer Conference, November 18-19.
  13. Setty, S.P. 2010. Performance Evolution of AODV in Different Environment. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. 2(7), 2976-2981.
  14. Vetrivelan, N., Reddy, A. V. 2008. Performance Analysis of Three Routing Protocols for Varying MANET Size. Proceeding of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. 2,3-8.
  15. Mahmoud, Ali El-Haj, Khalaf, R. and Kayssi. 2007. Performance of the AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks, Lebanon.
  16. Jorg, David Oliver. 2003. Performance Comparison of MANET Routing Protocols in Different Network Sizes. Computer Networks & Distributed Systems.
  17. Broch, J. , Maltz, D. A. , Johnson, D. B. , Hu, Y. C. and Jetcheva, J. 1998. A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Network Routing Protocols. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking October 25-30, Dallas,Texas,USA,3-25.
  18. Rajan, C., Geetha, K., Rasi, C., Priya, Geetha, S., and Manikandan 2015. A Simple Analysis on Novel Based Open Source Network Simulation Tools for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. 5, 2-3.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANET Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Destination Sequenced Distance Vector Routing (DSDV) Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR)