Call for Paper - September 2020 Edition
IJCA solicits original research papers for the September 2020 Edition. Last date of manuscript submission is August 20, 2020. Read More

A Random Matrix - based Fraud Prevention Model

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Year of Publication: 2017
Monday Eze, Sam Ogunlere

Monday Eze and Sam Ogunlere. A Random Matrix - based Fraud Prevention Model. International Journal of Computer Applications 167(5):10-13, June 2017. BibTeX

	author = {Monday Eze and Sam Ogunlere},
	title = {A Random Matrix - based Fraud Prevention Model},
	journal = {International Journal of Computer Applications},
	issue_date = {June 2017},
	volume = {167},
	number = {5},
	month = {Jun},
	year = {2017},
	issn = {0975-8887},
	pages = {10-13},
	numpages = {4},
	url = {},
	doi = {10.5120/ijca2017914210},
	publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
	address = {New York, USA}


Computer-based examination fraud control is an important research area in e-testing. Fraud prevention ensures that the outcome of academic or professional tests approximates the actual capabilities of the candidates in question. Thus, instead of depending wholly on human efforts to monitor a real life examination, requisite computational techniques could be deployed to ensure a more effective invigilation process. Many cases of cheating in examinations involve the collusion of two or more individuals, especially based on the level of familiarity that may have existed before the examination. Thus, an effective control system should strongly incorporate anti-collusion measures. The major contribution of the Matrix-Based Fraud Check technique is the application of randomized algorithms to prevent examination fraud. This research achieves this by first breaking the pre-examination social links that could lead to examination collusions. The strength of this model is that it could analyze the existing seating arrangements and as well suggests the most optimal arrangement that reduces collusion to the barest minimum. The model also generates a watch list of candidates that are most likely to be vulnerable to collusion in a particular examination hall. Such valuable information will no doubt guide the examiners in the invigilation process.


  1. Claire J. T., Ian M., Alexandre M. B., and Meeko O. 2003. Computational Techniques for the Verification of Hybrid Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 91, No. 7, p1-29
  2. Eze M.O. 2014. Computational Models for Examination Fraud Control Using Randomized Algorithms. The Proc. of Multi-Conf. on Society, Cybernetics & Infor. Jul. 15 - 18, Orlando, Florida.
  3. Luisa S., Catarina C., Carlos A., Rui C. 2011. Computational Techniques and Validation of Blood Flow Simulation. WSEAS Trans. on Bio. & Biomedicine, Issue 4, Vol. 8, p145-155
  4. Ahmed S.M, Beck B, Maurana C.A, Newton G. 2004. Overcoming Barriers to Effective Community-Based Participatory Research in US Medical Schools. Edu. for Health Vol. 17, No. 2, p141-151
  5. Michael I. N., Jeana H. F., Dan A. 2007. Less Is More: The Lure of Ambiguity, or Why Familiarity Breeds Contempt, J. of Personality and Social Psy. Vol. 92, No. 1, p97–105
  6. Oduwaiye, R.O. 2014. Students Perception of Factors and Solutions to Examination Malpractices in Nigerian Universities: A Case study of the University of Ilorin., Accessed Feb 1, 2014.
  7. Lilian C. and Ndudzo, D. 2014. Students and Staff Perceptions on Examination Malpractice and Fraud in Higher Education in Zimbabwe. Asian J. of Humanities and Social Sc. Vol. 2, Issue 2, p78-90
  8. Kirsten E. M. 2011. TMI (Too Much Information): The Role of Friction and Familiarity in Disclosing Information, Business and Professional Ethics. Journals, Vol. 30, No.1-2, p4-32
  9. Nafis Alam. Challenges Faced by Sudanese Banks in Implementing Online Banking: Bankers’ Perception. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, Aug. 2010, Vol. 15, No.2, p1-9
  10. Pedro M.A, Antonio G. and Ruiz, M. 2013. A New Randomness Test for Bit Sequences, Informatica, Vol. 24, No. 3, 339–356.
  11. Simmons, K., Carpenter, L., Crenshaw, S. and Hinton, V..M. 2015. Exploration of Classroom Seating Arrangement and Student Behavior in a Second Grade Classroom. Georgia Educational Researcher: Vol. 12: Issue. 1, Article 3, p50-68.
  12. Hammang, A.J. 2012. The Effect of Seating Assignment on Student Achievement in Biology Classroom. An MSc thesis submitted to Science Education Department, Montana State Univ.
  13. Wickham, H. 2014. Tidy Data. Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 59, Issue 10, p1-23
  14. Stewart, M., Brown, M.E and Weatherstone, A. 2009. Interactive Scenario Design: The Value of Flowcharts and Schemas in Developing Scenario-based Lessons for Online and Flexible Learning Contexts, J. of Dist. Learning, Vol.13, No. 1, p71–90.
  15. Mala.V.P. and Nageswara, A.M.Y. 2011. Importance of Data Collection for Systematic Software Development Process. Internat. Journal of Comp. Sc and IT. Vol 3, No 2, p260-278.
  16. Jamil S. 2009. The Growing Accountability Agenda in Tertiary Education: Progress or Mixed Blessing?. World Bank Education Working Paper Series, No. 16, Washington, DC, p1-30.


Randomized Algorithms, Matrix-Based Fraud Check, e-Testing, Watch List