CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Digital Anti-Corruption Typology for Public Service Delivery

by Fredrick Mutungi, Rehema Baguma, Annabella Habinka Dorothy Basaza-Ejiri, Tomasz Janowski
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 174 - Number 20
Year of Publication: 2021
Authors: Fredrick Mutungi, Rehema Baguma, Annabella Habinka Dorothy Basaza-Ejiri, Tomasz Janowski
10.5120/ijca2021921089

Fredrick Mutungi, Rehema Baguma, Annabella Habinka Dorothy Basaza-Ejiri, Tomasz Janowski . Digital Anti-Corruption Typology for Public Service Delivery. International Journal of Computer Applications. 174, 20 ( Feb 2021), 6-15. DOI=10.5120/ijca2021921089

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2021921089,
author = { Fredrick Mutungi, Rehema Baguma, Annabella Habinka Dorothy Basaza-Ejiri, Tomasz Janowski },
title = { Digital Anti-Corruption Typology for Public Service Delivery },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Feb 2021 },
volume = { 174 },
number = { 20 },
month = { Feb },
year = { 2021 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 6-15 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume174/number20/31790-2021921089/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2021921089 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:22:37.816506+05:30
%A Fredrick Mutungi
%A Rehema Baguma
%A Annabella Habinka Dorothy Basaza-Ejiri
%A Tomasz Janowski
%T Digital Anti-Corruption Typology for Public Service Delivery
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 174
%N 20
%P 6-15
%D 2021
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Digital anti-corruption refers to a family of digital technology tools that are used to fight corruption. Many such tools have not performed well in practice due to their non-alignment with forms of corruption they are supposed to fight against and persistence of corruption-enabling conditions. The aim of this paper is to contribute to filling this gap by offering a typology of digital anti-corruption in public service delivery that can be used to decide what digital measures should be applied to fight against specific forms of corruption or address specific corruption-enabling conditions. The typology also highlights that digital technology can both assist in corrupt practices e.g. theft, falsification and destruction of digital personal records and aid the fight against corruption e.g. mobile channels to report incidents of corruption, automated audits of transaction records to uncover fraudulent payments, or service automation to replace discretionary decision making by public officials with rule-based automated decision-making. The typology is grounded in research and policy literature and validated using real-life examples from East Africa.

References
  1. C. Egberi, A. E., & Madumelu, “Corruption and Service Delivery in Local Government System in Nigeria: A Content Analysis,” Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 5, no. 10, 2014.
  2. R. Parveen, Y. J. Amuda, and S. Hassan, “Effects of corruption on the human social economic development: A case study of India, Nigeria and Bangladesh,” Int. J. Econ. Res., vol. 14, no. 20, pp. 373–388, 2017.
  3. A. Bolanle, “Forensic Accounting As a Tool for Fighting Corruption and Terrorism: Case Study of Nigeria,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Econ. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 2210–2225, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://ijsser.org/uploads/ijsser_02__137.pdf.
  4. N. Suleiman and Z. Othman, “Corruption Typology: A Review of Literature,” Chinese Bus. Rev., vol. 16, no. 2, p. 102, 2017, doi: 10.17265/1537-1506/2017.02.004.
  5. M. Cummins and B. Huddleston, “Real time monitoring for the most vulnerable: UNICEF’s experience in Uganda,” IDS Bull., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 57–68, 2013.
  6. E. Okewu and J. Okewu, “E-government, e-Governance and e-Administration: A Typology of Corruption Management Using ICTs,” in European Conference on e-Government, 2015, pp. 203–212.
  7. I. Holeman, T. P. Cookson, and C. Pagliari, “Digital technology for health sector governance in low and middle income countries: A scoping review,” J. Glob. Health, vol. 6, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.020408.
  8. J. Lemaire, “Scaling up mobile health: Elements necessary for the successful scale up of mHealth in developing countries.” Geneva: Advanced Development for Africa, 2011.
  9. A. Mills, “Causes Of Corruption In Public Sector Institutions and Its Impact On Development: Turning What We Know Into What We Do,” no. May, pp. 1–35, 2012.
  10. AfriMAP, Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Agencies in East Africa. 2015.
  11. Transparency International, “Corruption Perceptions Index 2015,” 2015. doi: 978-3-943497-18-2.
  12. S. Basu, “E‐government and developing countries: an overview,” Int. Rev. Law, Comput. Technol., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 109–132, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1080/13600860410001674779.
  13. J. Gaventa and R. McGee, “The Impact of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives,” Dev. Policy Rev., vol. 31, pp. s3–s28, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1111/dpr.12017.
  14. S. Bhatnagar, “Public Service Delivery: Role of Information and Communication Technology in Improving Governance and Development Impact. Asian Development Bank.,” 2014, [Online]. Available: http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/31238/ewp-391.pdf.
  15. M. Lodge and L. Stirton, “Regulating in the Interest of the Citizen: Towards a Single Model of Regulatory Transparency?,” Social and Economic Studies, vol. 50. Sir Arthur Lewis Institute of Social and Economic StudiesUniversity of the West Indies, pp. 103–137, 2001, doi: 10.2307/27865234.
  16. R. Heeks, “Most e-Government-for-Development Projects Fail How Can Risks be Reduced ?,” 2003.
  17. R. Heeks and H. Mathisen, “Understanding success and failure of anti-corruption initiatives,” Crime, Law Soc. Chang., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 533–549, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10611-011-9361-y.
  18. Haslinda Sutan Ahmad Nawi, A. A. Rahman, and O. Ibrahim, “Government’s ICT project failure factors: A revisit,” in 2011 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems, Nov. 2011, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/ICRIIS.2011.6125738.
  19. A. Prakash and R. De’, “Importance of development context in ICT4D projects,” Inf. Technol. People, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 262–281, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1108/09593840710822868.
  20. J. Hellström and B. Bocast, “Many ‘likers’ do not constitute a crowd: The case of Uganda’s Not In My Country,” in ICT for anti-corruption, democracy and education in East Africa, 2013.
  21. J. C. Bertot, P. T. Jaeger, and J. M. Grimes, “Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 264–271, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1016/J.GIQ.2010.03.001.
  22. R. McGee and R. Carlitz, “Learning Study on ‘The Users’ in Technology for Transparency and Accountability Initiatives: Assumptions and Realities,” 2013.
  23. J. Hellström, “Who leads, who follows? Re-examining the party–electorate linkages on European integration,” J. Eur. Public Policy, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1127–1144, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1080/13501760802407649.
  24. J. Hellström and A. Karefelt, “Mobile participation? crowdsourcing during the 2011 uganda general elections,” 2012.
  25. T. D. Susanto and R. Goodwin, “Factors Influencing Citizen Adoption of SMS-Based e-Government Services,” Electron. J. e-Government, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 55–70, 2010.
  26. H. Wasserman, “Mobile Phones, Popular Media, and Everyday African Democracy: Transmissions and Transgressions,” Pop. Commun., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 146–158, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1080/15405702.2011.562097.
  27. A. A. Olorunnisola and B. L. Martin, “Influences of media on social movements: Problematizing hyperbolic inferences about impacts,” Telemat. Informatics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 275–288, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.TELE.2012.02.005.
  28. CIPESA, “How Ict Tools Are Promoting Citizen Participation in Uganda,” 2012.
  29. T. Janowski, E. Estevez, and R. Baguma, “Platform governance for sustainable development: Reshaping citizen-administration relationships in the digital age,” Gov. Inf. Q., no. August, pp. 1–16, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.002.
  30. M. S. S. J.-W. Iqbal and J.-W. Seo, “E-Governance as an anti corruption tool Korean cases,” J. Korean Assoc. Reg. Inf. Soc. vol. 11(no. 2), 2008, Accessed: Feb. 03, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.kdevelopedia.org/Resources/government-law/e-governance-as-anti-corruption-tool--05201506220138576.do?fldIds=TP_GOV%7CTP_GOV_PA#.XFbEE1VKhLs.
  31. T. Mutungi, F., Baguma, R., Janowski, “Towards digital anti-corruption typology for public service delivery,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2019, pp. 484–494, doi: 10.1145/3325112.3325266.
  32. A. Grönlund, Using ICT to combat corruption-tools, methods and result, no. 3. 2010.
  33. T. Davies and S. Fumega, “Mixed incentives : Adopting ICT innovations for,” no. 4, pp. 1–24, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://www.cmi.no/publications/file/5172-mixed-incentives.pdf.
  34. H. Arksey and L. O. Malley, “SCOPING STUDIES: TOWARDS A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK,” pp. 19–32, 2005.
  35. T. Vian, “Review of corruption in the health sector : theory , methods and interventions,” pp. 83–94, 2008, doi: 10.1093/heapol/czm048.
  36. A. Neupane, “UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND E-PROCUREMENT TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT,” no. July, 2014.
  37. F. B. Osang, N. Abinwi, and C. Tsuma, “Reviewing Information Systems Usage and Performance Models,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 476–484, 2015.
  38. N. Kossow, “Anti-Corruption and Integrity Programme Embracing Digitalisation: How to use ICT to strengthen Anti-Corruption Embracing Digitalisation: How to use ICT to strengthen Anti-Corruption,” 2018.
  39. Transparency International, “Corruption Perceptions Index 2016,” 2016. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021392.
  40. J. Andvig, O. Fjeldstad, and T. Søreide, “Research on Corruption: A Policy Oriented Survey,” Int. Aff., no. December, pp. 1–144, 2000.
  41. S. Rose-Ackerman and B. J. Palifka, Corruption and Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  42. O. B. Ijewereme, “Anatomy of Corruption in the Nigerian Public Sector,” SAGE Open, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 215824401558118, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1177/2158244015581188.
  43. D. E. Agbiboa, “Protectors or Predators? The Embedded Problem of Police Corruption and Deviance in Nigeria,” Adm. Soc., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 244–281, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0095399713513142.
  44. Human Rights Watch, “Letting the Big Fish Swim” - Failures to Prosecute High-Level Corruption in Uganda. 2013.
  45. Å. Asiimwe, E.N., Wakabi, W. and Grönlund, “ICT for Anti-Corruption , Democracy and Education in East Africa ICT for Anti-Corruption , Democracy and Education in East Africa,” no. 6. 2013.
  46. Inspectorate of Government, “Using the data tracking mechanism 2014,” 2014.
  47. K. R. Hope, Corruption and Governance in Africa. 2017.
  48. S. Lindner, “Tanzania: Overview of corruption and anti-corruption,” 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.u4.no/publications/tanzania-overview-of-corruption-and-anti-corruption.
  49. T. Vian, “Review of corruption in the health sector: theory, methods and interventions,” Health Policy Plan., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 83–94, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1093/heapol/czm048.
  50. Inspectorate General, “Using the data tracking mechanism 2014,” 2014.
  51. D. Mele, “Corruption: 10 Possible Causes | Business Ethics.” https://blog.iese.edu/ethics/2014/11/06/corruption-10-possible-causes/ (accessed Feb. 03, 2019).
  52. V. Tanzi, “Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope and Cures,” 1998.
  53. R. (Eds. ). (2006). T. role of parliament in curbing corruption. W. B. P. Stapenhurst, R., Johnston, N., & Pelizzo, Curbing corruption. 2006.
  54. CIPE, “Combating Corruption: A Private Sector Approach,” 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance/brief/anti-corruption.
  55. S. Rose-Ackerman and B. J. Palifka, Corruption and Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  56. K. Gopakumar, “Increasing information access to improve political accountability and participation: mapping future actions in Asia Pacific,” 2001.
  57. K. R. Hope Sr., “Tackling the corruption epidemic in {Kenya}: {Toward} a policy of more effective control,” J. Soc. Polit. Econ. Stud., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 287–316, 2013, [Online]. Available: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84884473260&partnerID=40&md5=1235f24114e783fc3b3d74585a4083af.
  58. CIPE, “Combating Corruption: A Private Sector Approach,” 2011.
  59. P. N. Nyingi, “Kenya Wins a Gold Medal for Corruption,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Inf. Secur., vol. 04, no. 03, pp. 1–10, 2017.
  60. CETA, “Corruption and Democratic Practices in Tanzania,” Civ. Educ. Teach. Assoc., vol. 9, 2011.
  61. H. Marquette and C. Peiffer, “Collective Action and Systemic Corruption,” ECPR Jt. Sess. Work. Univ. Warsaw, no. April, pp. 1–28, 2015.
  62. S. B. ed. Ebb, Public Sector Reform : What Works and Why ? An IEG Evaluation of World Bank Support. 2008.
  63. M. Martini, “Uganda overview of corruption and anti corruption. U4 Expert Answer. TI.,” vol. U4, no. April, 2013.
  64. World Bank, Global Economic Prospects 2010. 2008.
  65. P. N. Nyingi, “Kenya Wins a Gold Medal for Corruption,” vol. 04, no. 03, pp. 1–10, 2017.
  66. D. Ringold, A. Holla, M. Koziol, and S. Srinivasan, “Citizens and service delivery: assessing the use of social accountability approaches in human development sectors,” 2011.
  67. U. Office of the President, “National Strategy To Fight Corruption and Rebuild Ethics and Integrity in Uganda,” 2008.
  68. A. Mills, “Causes of corruption in public sector institutions and its impact on development,” 2012.
  69. Inspectorate General, Report To Parliament. 2016.
  70. Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission, “Report of Activities and Financial Statements for the Financial Year 2015 / 2016 for,” 2016. doi: 10.1080/15216540701311147.
  71. R. Bariyo and P. T. Ngoboka, “FIGHTING CORRUPTION IN THE HEALTH SECTOR : SECURING IMPROVED HEALTHCARE SERVICE DELIVERY AND UTILIZATION IN UGANDA,” pp. 1–8.
  72. J. C. Kohler, “Fighting corruption in the health sector methods, tools and good practices,” 2011.
  73. J. Andvig, O. Fjeldstad, and A. Søreide, “Research on Corruption: A Policy Oriented Survey,” Int. Aff., no. December, pp. 1–144, 2000.
  74. D. Mele, “Corruption: 10 Possible Causes | Business Ethics.” .
  75. I. Holeman, T. Cookson, and C. Pagliari, “Digital technology for health sector governance,” J. Glob. Health, vol. [In print], 2016.
  76. A. Joshi, “Do They Work? Assessing the Impact of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives in Service Delivery,” Dev. Policy Rev., vol. 31, pp. s29–s48, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1111/dpr.12018.
  77. N. Kossow and V. Dykes, “Embracing Digitalisation: How to use ICT to strengthen Anti-Corruption,” Giz, 2018.
  78. T. Kim, K. and Kang, “Does Technology Against Corruption Always Lead to Benefit ? The Potential Risks and Challenges of the Blockchain Technology,” 2017.
  79. H. Arksey and L. O. Malley, “Scoping Studies: Towards A Methodological Framework,” pp. 19–32, 2005.
  80. I. Adam and M. Fazekas, “Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption in developing countries?,” Pathways Prosper. Comm. Backgr. Pap. Ser., vol. 21, no. April, p. 34, 2018, [Online]. Available: www.pathwayscommission.bsg.ox.ac.uk.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Corruption Public Services Anti-corruption Digital anticorruption measures Anti-Corruption Typology.

Powered by PhDFocusTM