CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Perceptions of Instructional Video Clips: Effects of the Presence or Absence of a Model in Instructional Video Clips on the Perception of the Model

by Iresh Bandara
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 179 - Number 47
Year of Publication: 2018
Authors: Iresh Bandara
10.5120/ijca2018917219

Iresh Bandara . Perceptions of Instructional Video Clips: Effects of the Presence or Absence of a Model in Instructional Video Clips on the Perception of the Model. International Journal of Computer Applications. 179, 47 ( Jun 2018), 1-8. DOI=10.5120/ijca2018917219

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2018917219,
author = { Iresh Bandara },
title = { Perceptions of Instructional Video Clips: Effects of the Presence or Absence of a Model in Instructional Video Clips on the Perception of the Model },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jun 2018 },
volume = { 179 },
number = { 47 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2018 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-8 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume179/number47/29489-2018917219/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2018917219 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T00:58:33.063399+05:30
%A Iresh Bandara
%T Perceptions of Instructional Video Clips: Effects of the Presence or Absence of a Model in Instructional Video Clips on the Perception of the Model
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 179
%N 47
%P 1-8
%D 2018
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Instructional videos are increasingly being used for educational purposes in academia. Distant learning is showing a massive growth in recent years and instructional videos are the key element of distance learning. The internet is filled with thousands of instructional video clips. However, characteristics such as the presence of a model in the video tend to differ across videos. This study aims to explore the effects of the presence or absence of a model in instructional video clips on the learners’ perception of the model, self-efficacy beliefs and perceived learning. A total of 78 Sri Lankan information technology undergraduate students participated in the study. Two instructional video clips on professional writing were used for the study; one where the viewers can see the model (video alternates between the model and the slides), and another one where they can only hear the voice of the model. Two video clips were randomly assigned to each participant and data was collected on their perception of the model, self-efficacy beliefs and perceived learning. The results showed that the presence or absence of the model does not have a significant effect on learners’ perception of the model, self-efficacy beliefs or perceived learning. However, both instructional video clips had a positive effect on learners’ self-efficacy.

References
  1. J. Bush and L. Zuidema, "Professional Writing in the English Classroom: Designing a High School or Middle School Course (or Unit) in Professional Writing", The English Journal, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 94-97, 2013.
  2. C. Cilliers, "Student perception of academic writing skills activities in a traditional programming course", Computers & Education, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1028-1041, 2012.
  3. N. Gopee and M. Deane, "Strategies for successful academic writing — Institutional and non-institutional support for students", Nurse Education Today, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1624-1631, 2013.
  4. J. Singleton-Jackson and J. Colella, "An Online Odyssey: A Case Study of Creating and Delivering an Online Writing Course for Undergraduate Students", MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 24-33, 2012.
  5. M. Perifanou, "How to design and evaluate a massive open online course (MOOC) for language learning", Conference Proceedings of »eLearning and Software for Education« (eLSE), pp. 283-290, 2014.
  6. E. Martínez-Gibson, "A Study on Cultural Awareness Through Commercials and Writing", Foreign Language Annals, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 115-139, 1998.
  7. E. Allen, J. Seaman, R. Poulin and T. Straut, "ONLINE REPORT CARD TRACKING ONLINE EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATES", Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC., 2016.
  8. P. Guo, J. Kim and R. Rubin, "How video production affects student engagement", Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference - L@S '14, 2014.
  9. V. Hoogerheide, M. van Wermeskerken, S. Loyens and T. van Gog, "Learning from video modeling examples: Content kept equal, adults are more effective models than peers", Learning and Instruction, vol. 44, pp. 22-30, 2016.
  10. R. Berk, "Multimedia Teaching with Video Clips: TV, Movies, YouTube, and mtvU in the College Classroom.", International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, vol. 5, pp. 1-21, 2009.
  11. J. Li, R. Kizilcec, J. Bailenson and W. Ju, "Social robots and virtual agents as lecturers for video instruction", Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 55, pp. 1222-1230, 2016.
  12. J. Daniel, "Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility", Journal of Interactive Media in Education, vol. 2012, no. 3, p. 18, 2012.
  13. V. Balakrishnan, T. Liew and S. Pourgholaminejad, "Fun learning with Edooware – A social media enabled tool", Computers & Education, vol. 80, pp. 39-47, 2015.
  14. R. Kizilcec, K. Papadopoulos and L. Sritanyaratana, "Showing face in video instruction", Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14, 2014.
  15. J. Wang and P. Antonenko, "Instructor presence in instructional video: Effects on visual attention, recall, and perceived learning", Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 71, pp. 79-89, 2017.
  16. M. Raedts, E. Van Steendam, L. De Grez, J. Hendrickx and C. Masui, "The effects of different types of video modelling on undergraduate students' motivation and learning in an academic writing course", Journal of Writing Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 399-435, 2017.
  17. A. Bandura, Self-efficacy. New York: W.H. Freeman, 2012.
  18. M. Bong, "Academic Motivation in Self-Efficacy, Task Value, Achievement Goal Orientations, and Attributional Beliefs", The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 287-298, 2004.
  19. S. Neuville, M. Frenay and E. Bourgeois, "Task Value, Self-Efficacy and Goal Orientations: Impact on self-regulated learning, choice and performance among university students", Psychologica Belgica, vol. 47, no. 1, p. 95, 2007.
  20. S. Allred, L. Harrison and D. O’Connell, "Self-Efficacy", The Prison Journal, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 211-233, 2013.
  21. C. Chang, E. Liu, H. Sung, C. Lin, N. Chen and S. Cheng, "Effects of online college student’s Internet self-efficacy on learning motivation and performance", Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 366-377, 2013.
  22. F. Mazlum, F. Cheraghi and M. Dasta, "English teachers' self-efficacy beliefs and students learning approaches", International Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 305, 2015.
  23. M. Matsumoto, "Second language learners' motivation and their perception of their teachers as an affecting factor", New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 37-52, 2011.
  24. M. Hartnett, "Motivation in Online Education", 2016.
  25. K. Xie, T. Debacker and C. Ferguson, "Extending the Traditional Classroom Through Online Discussion: The Role of Student Motivation", Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 67-89, 2006.
  26. M. Rentroia-Bonito, J. Jorge and C. Ghaoui, "Motivation to E-Learn Within Organizational Settings", International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 24-35, 2006.
  27. K. Hew, "Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS", British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 320-341, 2014.
  28. J. Reutemann, "Differences and Commonalities – A comparative report of video styles and course descriptions on edX, Coursera, Futurelearn and Iversity", EMOOCS 2016, pp. 383-392, 2016.
  29. B. Homer, J. Plass and L. Blake, "The effects of video on cognitive load and social presence in multimedia-learning", Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 786-797, 2008.
  30. C. Gunawardena, "Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences", International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 147-166, 1995.
  31. M. Hudson and P. Cairns, "The effects of winning and losing on social presence in team-based digital games", Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 60, pp. 1-12, 2016.
  32. C. Tu and M. McIsaac, "The Relationship of Social Presence and Interaction in Online Classes", American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 131-150, 2002.
  33. T. Hartsell and S. Yuen, "Video Streaming in Online Learning", Advancement of Computing in Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 31-43, 2006.
  34. J. Kim, P. Guo, D. Seaton, P. Mitros, K. Gajos and R. Miller, "Understanding in-video dropouts and interaction peaks inonline lecture videos", Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference - L@S '14, 2014.
  35. J. Jones, "Students' ratings of teacher personality and teaching competence", Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 551-558, 1989.
  36. B. Griffin, "Grading leniency, grade discrepancy, and student ratings of instruction", Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 410-425, 2004.
  37. A. Bandura, "Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales", in Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, T. Urdan and F. Pajares, Ed. Greenwich: CT: Information Age Publishing, 2006, pp. 307-337.
  38. K. Gogol, M. Brunner, T. Goetz, R. Martin, S. Ugen, U. Keller, A. Fischbach and F. Preckel, "“My Questionnaire is Too Long!” The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures", Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 188-205, 2014.
  39. B. Hoeppner, J. Kelly, K. Urbanoski and V. Slaymaker, "Comparative utility of a single-item versus multiple-item measure of self-efficacy in predicting relapse among young adults", Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 305-312, 2011.
  40. J. Bush and L. Zuidema, "Professional Writing in the English Classroom: Professional Writing: What You Already Know", The English Journal, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 117-120, 2010.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Instructional video perception online education professional writing writing self-efficacy perceived learning.

Powered by PhDFocusTM