The week's pick
Random Articles
Reseach Article
Payload Formats and Universal Data for Near Field Communication
| International Journal of Computer Applications |
| Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA |
| Volume 180 - Number 12 |
| Year of Publication: 2018 |
| Authors: L. N. Harnaningrum, Ahmad Ashari, Mardhani Riasetiawan |
10.5120/ijca2018916245
|
L. N. Harnaningrum, Ahmad Ashari, Mardhani Riasetiawan . Payload Formats and Universal Data for Near Field Communication. International Journal of Computer Applications. 180, 12 ( Jan 2018), 36-41. DOI=10.5120/ijca2018916245
Abstract
NFC has a variant where Type 1 with NFC-A, Type 2 with NFC-A, Type 3 with NFC F, and Type 4 with NFC-B. In its application, the use of NFC is based on its tag type. If we go further, each type has similarities and differences. We can look at the various parameters, but for now we will look at 4 parameters, namely Sequence format, Bit level coding, frame format and data & payload format. From the four parameters, compared to the parameter value and obtained the difference and the equation. With that use, an mobile application only runs in one type, while for another type must be modified. To overcome this, it is proposed a framework that can handle the tags of different types. Proposals are made for universal data and payload formats, and the expectations can be recognized by all NFC tag reading tools. Architectures are built with attention to the similarities and differences for each type. For above four parameters. Beginning with getting the data for the use of the most tag type, then made the proposed universal data format. Commonly used types are types 1 and 2. Of the two types, the differences of the four parameters are on the data and payload parameters. And more specifically on the CRC. Thus, a universal data and payload format with a specific CRC is used.
References
- A. Asaduzzaman, S. Mazumder, And S. Salinas. 2017. A Security-Aware Near Field Communication Architecture. Int. Conf. Networking, Syst. Secur.
- V. Coskun, B. Ozdenizci, And K. Ok, “The Survey On Near Field Communication. 2015. Sensors (Basel)., Vol. 15, No. 6, Pp. 13348–405.
- R. Minihold. 2011. Near Field Communication ( Nfc ) Technology And Measurements White Paper. P. 26.
- C. S. Kim, B. I. Jang, And H. K. Jung. 2014. Performance Analysis Of Anti-Collision Algorithm For Tag Identification Time Improvement. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Its Appl., Vol. 8, No. 3, Pp. 1–10.
- H. Vogt. 2002. Multiple Object Identification With Passive Rfid Tags. Ieee Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybern., Vol. Vol.3, No. October, P. 6.
- Y. Xiao-Lei, Y. Yin-Shan, Z. Zhi-Min, And W. Dong-Hua. 2014. Geometric Pattern Of Rfid Multi-Tag Distribution In Dynamic Iot Environment. Icist 2014 - Proc. 2014 4th Ieee Int. Conf. Inf. Sci. Technol., Vol. 1, No. 2, Pp. 809–812.
- K. Xiao And L. Luo. 2013. A Novel Mobile Device Nfc Stack Architecture. Ieee 11th Int. Conf. Dependable, Auton. Secur. Comput. Dasc 2013, Pp. 169–173.
- K. Fan, P. Song, And Y. Yang. 2017. Ulmap: Ultralightweight Nfc Mutual Authentication Protocol With Pseudonyms In The Tag For Iot In 5g. Mob. Inf. Syst., Vol. 2017.
- Nfc Forum Inc. 2010. Nfc Digital Protocol Technical Specification Nfc Forum Tm. Technology.
- Iso/Iec 18092. 2013. International Standard Iso/Iec Telecommunications And Information Communication — Interface And Protocol,” Int. Stand. Ref. Number Iso/Iec 180922013(E), Vol. Second Edi.
Index Terms
Keywords