CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Determinants of Instructional Leadership Practice at Colleges of Teacher Education in Amhara Region, Ethiopia

by Molalign Tamru, Atalay Mefin
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 181 - Number 30
Year of Publication: 2018
Authors: Molalign Tamru, Atalay Mefin
10.5120/ijca2018917900

Molalign Tamru, Atalay Mefin . Determinants of Instructional Leadership Practice at Colleges of Teacher Education in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. International Journal of Computer Applications. 181, 30 ( Nov 2018), 15-23. DOI=10.5120/ijca2018917900

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2018917900,
author = { Molalign Tamru, Atalay Mefin },
title = { Determinants of Instructional Leadership Practice at Colleges of Teacher Education in Amhara Region, Ethiopia },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Nov 2018 },
volume = { 181 },
number = { 30 },
month = { Nov },
year = { 2018 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 15-23 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume181/number30/30172-2018917900/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2018917900 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:09:56.526832+05:30
%A Molalign Tamru
%A Atalay Mefin
%T Determinants of Instructional Leadership Practice at Colleges of Teacher Education in Amhara Region, Ethiopia
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 181
%N 30
%P 15-23
%D 2018
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This study was mainly aimed at to assess the hampering factors of instructional leadership execution at colleges of teacher education in Amhararegion, Ethiopia. from the perspective of Hallinger and Murphy (1985) functions. To this end, the research firstly tried it attempted to explore whether there were statistically significant mean difference among instructional leadership function execution and colleges of teacher education in execution and it also tried to see the predictive value of independent variable (lack o vision, lack of time, lack of skill and training, lack of resource and lack of cooperation) on the dependent variable (effectiveness of instructional leadership function execution).The researchers have used a descriptive survey research design with purely quantitative approach. The data collected through different instruments from 196 teachers and 351 3rd year regular students were analyzed by considering the nature of data collected. the quantitative data analysis techniques ( regression, correlation, post hock and ANOVA) were used to analyze the data collected through closed-ended items of the questionnaires. From the analyses of the data collected, the major findings were standout in the study. The identified hindrance factors predict the effectiveness of instructional leadership function execution by (r=0.646) 64.6% and lack of resource was found out the major hindrance factor(r=0.42) and statistically significant mean difference were found between four colleges of teacher education in instructional leadership function execution (P<0.01) and there were also statistically significance mean difference among ten instructional leadership function execution (P<0.01). Finally, the researchers has drawn major conclusion under each research question. Based on this, recommendations were forwarded to different stakeholders like MoE, REB, college deans, teachers and students.

References
  1. Aikman, S., &amp;Unterhalter, E. (2005).Beyond access: Transforming policy and practice and M. Preedy(eds), Approaches to Post School Management, London: Harper and Row.
  2. American Psychological Association.(2018).Referencing Style Guide.Western Sydney University Library.
  3. Bush,T.(2008).From management to leadership.Educational management, Administration and leadership,36(2):271-288)
  4. Dimmock, C. (2000). redesigning school-based curriculum leadership: A Cross-cultural perspective.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 332- 358.
  5. Foskett, N., &amp;Lumby, J. (2003).Leading and managing education: International dimension, London: SAGE publications Inc Francisco.
  6. Fullan, M. (2003).The Moral Imperative of School Leadership. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
  7. Ghavifekr and et al(2014).Factors affecting strategic instructional leadership practice of school
  8. Hallinger, P. &amp; Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-248.
  9. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 229-351.
  10. Hallinger, P. (2009).Leadership For 21st Century Schools: From Instructional Leadership to Leadership for Learning.
  11. Harris and Muijs (2003). Effective Leadership for School Improvement. New York: Rutledge Flamer
  12. Hallinger, P. &amp; Murphy J. (2012). School leadership that makes a difference: International perspectives. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 359-367.
  13. Hopkins.D. (2005).Instructional Leadership and School Improvement. In Harris et.al eds) Effective Leadership for School Improvement. Rutledge Flamer
  14. Leithwood, K. (1999). Transformational leadership effects: a replication. Schools Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4): 451-479.
  15. Maregu B., Firew A., Ashebir B., Gizachew B. &amp;Alem,A.(2016).Analysis of Educational Management and Leadership Training practice in Ethiopia.Unpublished material.
  16. MoE. (2002) Education Sector Development Program II (ESDP II), Addis Ababa: Ministry of Education.
  17. MoE.(2002). The Education and Training Policy and its Implementation.MoE; Addis Ababa.
  18. Sergiovanni, T.T. (2001). The principal ship: a Reflective practice perspective (4th ed). London: Allyn and Bacon
  19. Syarwan A. &amp;Maznah H.(2012). Instructional Leadership Practices of the Excellent School Principals in Aceh, Indonesia.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Instructional leadership hindrance factors execute and opportunities