The week's pick
Reseach Article
Comparative Study of Online Collaborative Tools for Identification of Effective Tool for Marketing of Products
| International Journal of Computer Applications |
| Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA |
| Volume 182 - Number 18 |
| Year of Publication: 2018 |
| Authors: Anwesha Sinha, S. Taruna |
10.5120/ijca2018917889
|
Anwesha Sinha, S. Taruna . Comparative Study of Online Collaborative Tools for Identification of Effective Tool for Marketing of Products. International Journal of Computer Applications. 182, 18 ( Sep 2018), 14-18. DOI=10.5120/ijca2018917889
Abstract
Collaboration literally means “working together”—co-laboring, not just co-talking. Collaboration tools cannot just be about better knowledge sharing; they need to improve the speed and effectiveness of people’s efforts, getting things done in a timely and effective manner, execute tasks, communications, tracks progress, and achieves goals, no matter where the team members are located. This makes suitable for decentralized companies operating in more than one location. The research analysis was to be done by comparing all the available tool. This project has been aimed to identify the most suitable collaborative tool for the company to use both economically & efficiently. This included advanced research on KPIs, dashboard, normalization, comparison, ease of use.
References
- Van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, and Frans Hendrik Eemeren. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Vol. 14. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
- Osborne, Jonathan, Sibel Erduran, and Shirley Simon. "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science." Journal of research in science teaching 41.10 (2004): 994-1020.
- Taylor, James R., and Elizabeth J. Van Every. The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Routledge, 1999.
- Taylor, James R., and Elizabeth J. Van Every. The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Routledge, 1999.
- Duschl, Richard. "Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals." Review of research in education 32.1 (2008): 268-291.
- Berland, Leema Kuhn, and Brian J. Reiser. "Making sense of argumentation and explanation." Science Education 93.1 (2009): 26-55.
- Erduran, Sibel, and María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre. "Argumentation in science education." Perspectives from classroom-Based Research. Dordre-cht: Springer (2008).
- Von Aufschnaiter, Claudia, et al. "Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge." Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 45.1 (2008): 101-131.
- Sadler, Troy D., Sasha A. Barab, and Brianna Scott. "What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry?." Research in Science Education 37.4 (2007): 371-3
- Ford, Michael J., and Ellice A. Forman. "Chapter 1: Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts." Review of research in education 30.1 (2006): 1-32.
- Ford, Michael J., and Ellice A. Forman. "Chapter 1: Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts." Review of research in education 30.1 (2006): 1-32.
Index Terms
Keywords