CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Generating Timed Artificial Dream Action(TADA) as the Inverse Process of Freud

by M. A. El-dosuky
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 182 - Number 27
Year of Publication: 2018
Authors: M. A. El-dosuky
10.5120/ijca2018918131

M. A. El-dosuky . Generating Timed Artificial Dream Action(TADA) as the Inverse Process of Freud. International Journal of Computer Applications. 182, 27 ( Nov 2018), 1-6. DOI=10.5120/ijca2018918131

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2018918131,
author = { M. A. El-dosuky },
title = { Generating Timed Artificial Dream Action(TADA) as the Inverse Process of Freud },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Nov 2018 },
volume = { 182 },
number = { 27 },
month = { Nov },
year = { 2018 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-6 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume182/number27/30145-2018918131/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2018918131 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:15:04.707524+05:30
%A M. A. El-dosuky
%T Generating Timed Artificial Dream Action(TADA) as the Inverse Process of Freud
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 182
%N 27
%P 1-6
%D 2018
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Apart from being an audacious attempt and a masterpiece, Freud’s Interpretation of Dreams has provoked controversy since its publication. After the neurological linkage between Rapid Eye Movement( REM) sleep and dreams, many hypotheses are proposed focusing on REM or its accompanied dreams. This paper reviews recent discoveries regarding the neuro-cognitive aspects of sleep, dreaming, and emotions as a dream ingredient. This paper assumes that a dream content is decomposable into a sequence of Timed Artificial Dream Actions (TADAs) and that dream interpretation resembles the ability of an expert system explaining HOWand WHY questions. Freud tried to answer WHY each dream ingredient is being incorporated. The inverse of this process is to answer HOW a TADA is formed, and it is the concern of this paper. Based on dream-contents, an operational model for dream ingredients is proposed. The proposed TADA generator, nicknamed Oneiros, is decomposed into three modules Morpheus, Phantasos and Phobetor. Morpheus is responsible for the lexical processing of memory contents, in order to perform tasks such as extracting objects, emotions and alterations. Phobetor is responsible for all phobetic-specific aspects. Phantasos is responsible for the actual generation of a TADA.

References
  1. J. Allan Hobson. Rem sleep and dreaming: towards a theory of protoconsciousness. Nat Rev Neurosci, 10(11):803–813, Nov 2009.
  2. Sigmund Freud. The Interpretation of Dreams (Joyce Crick, Trans). Oxford University Press, 1900.
  3. Dennis Merritt. Building expert systems in prolog. Amazi. inc, 5861, 2001.
  4. Marc Denecker. A note on the declarative reading (s) of logic programming. arXiv preprint cs/0003056, 2000.
  5. Lulu Xie, Hongyi Kang, Qiwu Xu, Michael J Chen, Yonghong Liao, Meenakshisundaram Thiyagarajan, John O’Donnell, Daniel J Christensen, Charles Nicholson, Jeffrey J Iliff, et al. Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. science, 342(6156):373–377, 2013.
  6. Lisa Marshall, Halla Helgad´ottir, Matthias M¨olle, and Jan Born. Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory. Nature, 444(7119):610–613, 2006.
  7. Mayank R Mehta. Cortico-hippocampal interaction during up-down states and memory consolidation. Nature neuroscience, 10(1):13–15, 2007.
  8. Steffen Gais, Matthias M¨olle, Kay Helms, and Jan Born. Learning-dependent increases in sleep spindle density. The Journal of neuroscience, 22(15):6830–6834, 2002.
  9. Robert Stickgold, J Allen Hobson, Roar Fosse, and Magdalena Fosse. Sleep, learning, and dreams: off-line memory reprocessing. Science, 294(5544):1052–1057, 2001.
  10. Ullrich Wagner, Steffen Gais, Hilde Haider, Rolf Verleger, and Jan Born. Sleep inspires insight. Nature, 427(6972):352– 355, 2004.
  11. Lena Sayed. The function of dreams and dreaming: moving towards an integrated understanding. Master’s thesis, 2011.
  12. Carl Gustav Jung. Collected Works of CG Jung, Volume 8, volume 8. Princeton University Press, 1967.
  13. Mark Solms. The neuropsychology of dreams: A clinicoanatomical study. L. Erlbaum, 1997.
  14. Antti Revonsuo. The reinterpretation of dreams: An evolutionary hypothesis of the function of dreaming. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(6):877–901, 2000.
  15. Michael S Franklin and Michael J Zyphur. The role of dreams in the evolution of the human mind. Evolutionary Psychology, 3(1), 2005.
  16. Deirdre Barrett. An evolutionary theory of dreams and problem-solving. The New Science of Dreaming: Content, Recall and Personality Correlates, pages 133–154, 2007.
  17. GWilliam Domhoff. A new neurocognitive theory of dreams. Dreaming, 11(1):13–33, 2001.
  18. J. A. Hobson and R.W. McCarley. The brain as a dream state generator: an activation-synthesis hypothesis of the dream process. Am J Psychiatry, 134(12):1335–1348, Dec 1977.
  19. R Stickgold, A Malia, D Maguire, D Roddenberry, and M O’Connor. Replaying the game: Hypnagogic images in normals and amnesics. Science, 290(5490):350–353, October 2000.
  20. Kenway Louie and Matthew AWilson. Temporally structured replay of awake hippocampal ensemble activity during rapid eye movement sleep. Neuron, 29(1):145–156, 2001.
  21. P Maquet, P Peigneux, S Laureys, and C Smith. Be caught napping: you’re doing more than resting your eyes. Nature Neuroscience, 5(7):618–619, 2002.
  22. Frederick Snyder. Toward an evolutionary theory of dreaming. American Journal of Psychiatry, 123(2):121–136, 1966.
  23. WR Klemm. Why does rem sleep occur? a wake-up hypothesis. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 5, 2011.
  24. Robert P. Vertes. A life-sustaining function for rem sleep: A theory. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 10(4):371 – 376, 1986.
  25. Luiz Pessoa. On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(2):148–158, February 2008.
  26. Robert Plutchik. Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. Harpercollins College Division, 1980.
  27. Stanislav Grof. Modern consciousness research and human survival. Human survival and consciousness evolution, pages 57–79, 1988.
  28. Michael Davis. The role of the amygdala in fear-potentiated startle: implications for animal models of anxiety. Trends in pharmacological sciences, 13:35–41, 1992.
  29. Joseph LeDoux. The Amygdala Is NOT the Brain’s Fear Center, Aug 2015.
  30. Paul Ekman. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & emotion, 6(3-4):169–200, 1992.
  31. Paul Ekman and Daniel Cordaro. What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emotion Review, 3(4):364–370, 2011.
  32. Paul Ekman and Karl G Heider. The universality of a contempt expression: A replication. Motivation and emotion, 12(3):303–308, 1988.
  33. Mark Pizzato. Beast-People Onscreen and in Your Brain: The Evolution of Animal-Humans from Prehistoric Cave Art to Modern Movies. ABC-CLIO, 2016.
  34. William Smith. Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. 1849.
  35. Steven Bird. Nltk: the natural language toolkit. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Interactive presentation sessions, pages 69–72. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006.
  36. Joseph Weizenbaum. Eliza—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1):36–45, 1966.
  37. Chin-Yew Lin and Eduard Hovy. Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology-Volume 1, pages 71–78. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2003.
  38. George Miller. Wordnet: A lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM, 11(38):39–41, 1995.
  39. Hugo Liu and Push Singh. ConceptNet: A lexical database for english. BT Technology Journal, 4(22):211–226, 2004.
  40. Robert Speer, Joshua Chin, and Catherine Havasi. Conceptnet 5.5: An open multilingual graph of general knowledge. In AAAI, 2017.
  41. Mohammed A. El-dosuky. HKH : Helen keller heuristic, a common ground scenario for human-robot interaction. International Journal of Computer Applications, 89(2):1–6, March 2014.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Rapid Eye Movement(REM) sleep Dream Action Ngram