CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Performance Comparison of Two Infrared Sensor Types for Indoor Multi-Node Communication

by Abdulmuttalib T. Rashid, Ola A. Hasan, Ramzy S. Ali
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 182 - Number 33
Year of Publication: 2018
Authors: Abdulmuttalib T. Rashid, Ola A. Hasan, Ramzy S. Ali
10.5120/ijca2018918272

Abdulmuttalib T. Rashid, Ola A. Hasan, Ramzy S. Ali . Performance Comparison of Two Infrared Sensor Types for Indoor Multi-Node Communication. International Journal of Computer Applications. 182, 33 ( Dec 2018), 21-26. DOI=10.5120/ijca2018918272

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2018918272,
author = { Abdulmuttalib T. Rashid, Ola A. Hasan, Ramzy S. Ali },
title = { Performance Comparison of Two Infrared Sensor Types for Indoor Multi-Node Communication },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Dec 2018 },
volume = { 182 },
number = { 33 },
month = { Dec },
year = { 2018 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 21-26 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume182/number33/30243-2018918272/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2018918272 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:13:11.034016+05:30
%A Abdulmuttalib T. Rashid
%A Ola A. Hasan
%A Ramzy S. Ali
%T Performance Comparison of Two Infrared Sensor Types for Indoor Multi-Node Communication
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 182
%N 33
%P 21-26
%D 2018
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper compares the performance of two types of IR sensors that are used for communication among nodes to get the identity of each other. Practical circuits for these sensor types are built and tested in an environment which has nodes with cylindrical shape. Each node equipped by several pair of sensors: one sensor in each pair works as a transmitter and the other works as a receiver. The communication between sensors is repeated for different angles of rotation to produce a complete performance to each sensor. Based on the results of these comparisons, the TSOP4P38 IR receiver with remote control were chosen for communication in the practical implementation.

References
  1. F. R. Gfeller and U. H. Bapst, “Wireless in-house data communication via diffuse infrared radiation,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 67, pp. 1474–1486, Nov. 1979.
  2. Y. Nakata, J. Kashio, T. Kojima, and T. Noguchi, “In-housewireless communication system using infrared radiation,” Proc.7th Int. Conf. on Computer Commun., Sydney, Australia, Oct.30–Nov. 2, 1984, pp. 333–337.
  3. A. T. Rashid, M. Frasca, A, A, Ali, A. Rizzo and L. Foruna,” Multi-robot localization and orientation estimation using robotic cluster matching algorithm. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 63, p.p. 108–121, 2015.
  4. A. T. Rashid, W. H. Zayer and M. T. Rashid,” Design and Implementation of Locations Matching Algorithm for Multi-Object Recognition and Localization”, Iraqi Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 1, p.p. 10-21, 2018.
  5. O. A. Hasan, A. T. Rashid, R. S. Ali and J. Kosha,” A Practical Performance Analysis of Low-Cost Sensors for Indoor Localization of Multi-Node Systems “, Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA), Wrexham UK, September 2017.
  6. O. A. Hasan, A. T. Rashid and R. S. Ali,” Centralized approach for multi-node localization and identification “, Iraq J. Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol.12 No. 2, pp. 178-187, 20 1 6.
  7. O. A. Hasan, A. T. Rashid and R. S. Ali,” A Hybrid approach for multi-node localization and Identification “, Basrah Journal for Engineering Sciences, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 11- 20, 2016.
  8. A. T. Rashid and A. A. Ali, “Performance Analysis of Low-Cost Infrared Sensors for Multi-Robot Localization and Communication”, International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 182, No. 26, pp. 23-29, 2018.
  9. I. S. Alfurati and A. T. Rashid, “Performance Comparison of Three Types of Sensor Matrices for Indoor Multi-Robot Localization”, International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 181, No. 26, pp. 22-29, 2018.
  10. Y. T. Win, H. T. Htun, N. Afzulpurkar and C. Punyasai ,” Ultrasonic System Approach to Obstacle Detection and Edge Detection”, Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 127, Issue 4, pp. 56-68, 2011.
  11. B. Mustapha, A. Zayegh1and R.K. Begg,” Microcontroller Based Wireless Obstacle Detection System for the Elderly”, 2014 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence with Applications in Engineering and Technology, 2014.
  12. M. R. Yaacob, N. S. N. Anwar, and A. M. Kassim, “Effect of glittering and reflective objects of different colors to the output voltage-distance characteristics of sharp GP2D120 IR,” ACEEE Int. J. on Electrical and Power Engineering, vol. 03, no. 02, 2012.
  13. A. Howard, M. J Mataric, and G. S Sukhatme,” Mobile Sensor Network Deployment using Potential Fields: A Distributed, Scalable Solution to the Area Coverage Problem”, H. Asama et al. (eds.), Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems 5 © Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2002.
  14. [M, Sharma, A. Grover and P. Bande,”Low Cost Sensors for General Applications”, International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, Vol, 1, No. 5, pp. 150-152, 2009.
  15. F. R. Gfeller and U. H. Bapst, \Wireless in-house data Communication via diÆuse infrared radiation," Proceed- CARR UTHERS: WIRELESS INFRARED COMMUNICA TIONS 7 ings of the IEEE, vol. 67, pp. 1474{1486, Nov. 1979.
  16. J. M. Kahn and J. R. Barry, \Wireless infrared communications," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 85, pp. 265{98, Feb. 1997.
  17. 5 mm infrared LED, T1-1 3/4 IR333, Technical Data Sheet, 2005.
  18. IR receiver modules for mid-range proximity sensors (TSOP4P) datasheet, Vishay Semiconductors, 2010.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

IR transmitter IR receiver TSOP4P38 sensor