CFP last date
20 June 2025
Call for Paper
July Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming July edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 June 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Designing Multi-Tenant E-Learning Systems in the Cloud: A Process-Oriented Approach for Higher Education

Sameh Azouzi Sonia Ayachi Ghannouchi
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Comparative Analysis of AI Models in Solving 3x3x3 and Higher-Order Rubik’s Cube Puzzles

by Ishaan Singh
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2025
Authors: Ishaan Singh
10.5120/ijca2025925006

Ishaan Singh . Comparative Analysis of AI Models in Solving 3x3x3 and Higher-Order Rubik’s Cube Puzzles. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 10 ( Jun 2025), 25-28. DOI=10.5120/ijca2025925006

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2025925006,
author = { Ishaan Singh },
title = { Comparative Analysis of AI Models in Solving 3x3x3 and Higher-Order Rubik’s Cube Puzzles },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jun 2025 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 10 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2025 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 25-28 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number10/comparative-analysis-of-ai-models-in-solving-3x3x3-and-higher-order-rubiks-cubes/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2025925006 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2025-06-07T02:59:30.601787+05:30
%A Ishaan Singh
%T Comparative Analysis of AI Models in Solving 3x3x3 and Higher-Order Rubik’s Cube Puzzles
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 10
%P 25-28
%D 2025
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Artificial Intelligence has revolutionized the way machines approach complex problem-solving. One intriguing application lies in solving combinatorial puzzles like the Rubik’s Cube, which serve as benchmarks for algorithmic efficiency and cognitive modelling. This paper aims to show the comparative analysis of AI models in how they approach difference Rubik’s Cube puzzles (3x3x3, 4x4x4 and 5x5x5). The findings provide insights into the design of more adaptive, scalable solvers for high-dimensional discrete environments, contributing to the broader field of AI planning and decision-making.

References
  1. Agostinelli, F., McAleer, S., Shmakov, A., &Baldi, P. (2019).
  2. Solving the Rubik's Cube with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Search.
  3. Juntao Chen (2018).Different Algorithms to Solve a Rubik’s Cube
  4. Mahindra Roshan, S.Rakesh, T.SriGnana Guru, B.Rohith, J.Hemalatha. (2024).Towards efficiently solving the rubik’s cube with deep reinforcement learning and recursion
  5. Kociemba, Herbert. Cube Explorer (Windows program). http://kociemba.org/cube.htm
  6. Korf, Richard E IJCAI-97.Finding Optimal Solutions to Rubik’s Cube Using Pattern Databases.
  7. Emir Barucija, AmilaAkagic, Samir Ribic, ZelijkoJuric.Two approaches in solving Rubik’s cube with Hardware-Software Co-design.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Rubik's Cubes Algorithmic Efficiency Analysis

Powered by PhDFocusTM