CFP last date
22 June 2026
Reseach Article

Agentic AI in Enterprise Integration: A Governed Multi-Agent Architecture for API-Driven Enterprises

by Padmanabhan Venkiteela
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 104
Year of Publication: 2026
Authors: Padmanabhan Venkiteela
10.5120/ijcabac1d630dae0

Padmanabhan Venkiteela . Agentic AI in Enterprise Integration: A Governed Multi-Agent Architecture for API-Driven Enterprises. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 104 ( May 2026), 8-22. DOI=10.5120/ijcabac1d630dae0

@article{ 10.5120/ijcabac1d630dae0,
author = { Padmanabhan Venkiteela },
title = { Agentic AI in Enterprise Integration: A Governed Multi-Agent Architecture for API-Driven Enterprises },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2026 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 104 },
month = { May },
year = { 2026 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 8-22 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number104/agentic-ai-in-enterprise-integration-a-governed-multi-agent-architecture-for-api-driven-enterprises/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijcabac1d630dae0 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2026-05-17T02:29:17.020255+05:30
%A Padmanabhan Venkiteela
%T Agentic AI in Enterprise Integration: A Governed Multi-Agent Architecture for API-Driven Enterprises
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 104
%P 8-22
%D 2026
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Enterprise integration is undergoing a paradigm shift from deterministic, workflow-driven orchestration toward autonomous, AI-driven execution models. While recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and agentic AI enable intelligent task planning and execution, existing approaches lack the governance, interoperability, observability, and resilience required for deployment in enterprise environments. This gap limits the adoption of agentic systems in mission-critical and regulated domains. This paper presents a governed multi-agent architecture for API-driven enterprises, designed to bridge the gap between autonomous decision-making and enterprise-grade control. The proposed architecture integrates a multi-agent orchestration model with a centralized governance plane, enabling identity-aware, policy-driven, and risk-aware execution of agent actions. A unified interoperability layer abstracts interactions with heterogeneous enterprise systems through API gateways, protocol adaptation, and event-driven communication, ensuring scalability and flexibility. To support operational reliability, the architecture incorporates an end-to-end observability framework that captures logs, metrics, traces, and decision-level telemetry, enabling full lifecycle visibility and decision traceability. Additionally, a structured failure taxonomy and adaptive recovery framework is introduced, supporting context-aware failure classification and dynamic recovery strategies, including retry, rollback, and human-in-the-loop escalation. The proposed approach is evaluated across multiple enterprise scenarios and compared with single-agent and workflow-based systems using metrics such as task completion success rate, policy compliance, latency, error rate, and mean time to recovery. The results demonstrate that governed multi-agent systems achieve higher reliability, improved compliance, reduced recovery time, and enhanced observability, while maintaining scalability and operational efficiency. The findings highlight the potential of governed multi-agent architectures to enable secure, scalable, and resilient enterprise integration, providing a practical foundation for deploying agentic AI systems in real-world enterprise environments.

References
  1. N. R. Jennings, “An Agent-Based Approach for Building Complex Software Systems,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 35–41, 2001.[Online], Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/367211.36725
  2. D. Linthicum, Enterprise Application Integration. Addison-Wesley, 1999. [Online], Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/Enterprise_Application_Integration.html?id=LIYadz3qEyEC
  3. G. Hohpe and B. Woolf, Enterprise Integration Patterns. Addison-Wesley, 2003. [Online], Available: https://arquitecturaibm.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Addison-Wesley-Enterprise-Integration-Patterns-Designing-Building-And-Deploying-Messaging-Solutions-With-Notes.pdf
  4. MuleSoft, “Anypoint Platform Architecture Overview,” 2023. [Online], Available: https://www.mulesoft.com
  5. Boomi, “Integration Platform as a Service Overview,” 2024. [Online], Available: https://boomi.com
  6. SAP, “SAP Integration Suite Architecture Guide,” 2024. [Online], Available: https://www.sap.com
  7. H. Touvron et al., “LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models,” 2023. [Online], Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13971
  8. T. Schick et al., “Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools,” 2023. [Online], Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761
  9. LangChain, “LangChain Documentation,” 2024. [Online], Available: https://www.langchain.com
  10. Y. Wu et al., “AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation,” 2023. [Online], Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08155
  11. S. Hong et al., “MetaGPT: Meta Programming for Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework,” 2023. [Online], Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.00352
  12. X. Wang et al., “Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models,” 2023. [Online], Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16291
  13. M. Wooldridge, An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems, 2nd ed. Wiley, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://virtualmmx.ddns.net/gbooks/AnIntroductiontoMultiAgentSystems.pdf
  14. V. Lesser, “Multi-Agent Coordination and Its Implications,” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 1998. [Online], Available: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010046623013
  15. M. B. Blake, “Service-Oriented Architectures Using Multi-Agent Systems,” IEEE Internet Computing, 2011. [Online], Available: DOI:10.1109/MIC.2010.147
  16. OpenTelemetry, “OpenTelemetry Specification,” 2023. [Online], Available: https://opentelemetry.io
  17. J. Turnbull, The Art of Monitoring. O’Reilly, 2014.[Online], Available: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/the-art-of/9780988820241/
  18. NIST, “Zero Trust Architecture,” SP 800-207, 2020. [Online], Available: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov
  19. G. Hohpe, “API Integration Patterns,” IEEE Software, 2020. [Online], Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.12594
  20. AWS, “Event-Driven Architecture,” 2023. [Online], Available: https://aws.amazon.com/event-driven-architecture
  21. Confluent, “Apache Kafka Platform,” 2023. [Online], Available: https://www.confluent.io
  22. Google, “BeyondCorp Security Model,” 2014. [Online], Available: https://cloud.google.com/beyondcorp
  23. NIST, “Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC),” SP 800-162, 2014. [Online], Available: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov
  24. R. Sandhu et al., “Role-Based Access Control Models,” IEEE Computer, 1996. [Online], Available: https://profsandhu.com/journals/computer/i94rbac(org).pdf
  25. M. Fowler, “Microservices Architecture,” 2014. [Online], Available: https://martinfowler.com
  26. B. Burns et al., Kubernetes: Up and Running, O’Reilly, 2022. [Online], Available: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/kubernetes-up-and/9781491935668/
  27. J. Dean and S. Ghemawat, “MapReduce,” Communications of the ACM, 2008. [Online], Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1327452.132749
  28. M. Kleppmann, Designing Data-Intensive Applications. O’Reilly, 2017. [Online], Available: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/designing-data-intensive-applications/9781491903063/
  29. Microsoft, “Azure AI Multi-Agent Systems,” 2024. [Online], Available: https://learn.microsoft.com
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Agentic AI Multi-Agent Systems Enterprise Integration API Architecture Governance Observability Failure Recovery iPaaS