CFP last date
20 May 2026
Reseach Article

Designing and Evaluating Blended Learning Models for Enhanced Engagement and Skill Acquisition in Engineering and IT Education

by Jerome Ofori-Kyeremeh
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 107
Year of Publication: 2026
Authors: Jerome Ofori-Kyeremeh
10.5120/ijcad16c9ef60f94

Jerome Ofori-Kyeremeh . Designing and Evaluating Blended Learning Models for Enhanced Engagement and Skill Acquisition in Engineering and IT Education. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 107 ( May 2026), 24-29. DOI=10.5120/ijcad16c9ef60f94

@article{ 10.5120/ijcad16c9ef60f94,
author = { Jerome Ofori-Kyeremeh },
title = { Designing and Evaluating Blended Learning Models for Enhanced Engagement and Skill Acquisition in Engineering and IT Education },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2026 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 107 },
month = { May },
year = { 2026 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 24-29 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number107/designing-and-evaluating-blended-learning-models-for-enhanced-engagement-and-skill-acquisition-in-engineering-and-it-education/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijcad16c9ef60f94 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2026-05-21T00:17:02.075281+05:30
%A Jerome Ofori-Kyeremeh
%T Designing and Evaluating Blended Learning Models for Enhanced Engagement and Skill Acquisition in Engineering and IT Education
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 107
%P 24-29
%D 2026
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Blended learning, which integrates face-to-face instruction with digital learning activities, has become a transformative pedagogical approach in engineering and information technology (IT) education. This approach addresses the growing need for flexible, engaging, and skill-oriented learning experiences in disciplines that require both conceptual understanding and practical expertise. This study explores the design, implementation, and evaluation of blended learning models aimed at enhancing student engagement, intrinsic motivation, and skill acquisition. Grounded in constructivist learning theory and Self-Determination Theory (SDT), the research emphasizes active knowledge construction, autonomy, and the development of competence and relatedness in learning contexts. Through a systematic synthesis of empirical studies from 2020 to 2025, the paper identifies effective instructional strategies, including flipped classrooms, interactive virtual laboratories, coding and simulation exercises, problem-based projects, and collaborative peer learning. These strategies are shown to enhance cognitive outcomes, practical skill mastery, and affective engagement, fostering deeper understanding and professional readiness among engineering and IT students. The study also examines challenges in implementing blended learning, including technological access, faculty readiness, and instructional alignment, and proposes adaptive, theory-driven frameworks for maximizing pedagogical effectiveness. Overall, the findings suggest that well-structured blended learning models not only strengthen technical competencies and problem-solving skills but also cultivate learner autonomy, collaboration, and sustained engagement. The paper provides a comprehensive guide for educators, curriculum designers, and institutions seeking to leverage blended learning for STEM education, ensuring alignment between instructional design, student motivation, and discipline-specific learning outcomes.

References
  1. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
  2. Graham, C. R. (2020). Blended learning definitions and models. In Handbook of blended learning research (pp. 9–27). Routledge.
  3. Hew, K. F., Lan, M., & Tang, Y. (2021). Examining blended learning effectiveness for engineering courses. Computers & Education, 168, Article 104213.
  4. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2022). Technology outlook for engineering education 2022–2027. EDUCAUSE.
  5. Jonassen, D. H. (2020). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  6. Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2021). Issues and challenges in blended STEM education. Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 56–73.
  7. Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2021). Student engagement in blended learning environments. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 12.
  8. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2020). Blended vs. traditional learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 90(5), 711–745.
  9. O’Byrne, W. I., Pytash, K. E., & Smith, M. (2023). Engineering education and blended problem-based learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(2), 289–307.
  10. Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2023). Blended learning design principles revisited. The Internet and Higher Education, 61, Article 100843.
  11. Radha, P., Huang, F., & Kumar, V. (2022). Applying blended learning in IT programs. International Journal of Information Technology Education, 30(4), 245–262.
  12. Vlachopoulos, D. (2021). Building community in blended learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 683–701.
  13. Vaughan, N., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2021). Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Athabasca University Press.
  14. Zhai, X. (2022). Digital skills and workplace readiness in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35(3), 149–161.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Blended learning engineering education IT education constructivist learning self-determination theory student engagement skill acquisition STEM pedagogy flipped classroom virtual labs