CFP last date
20 October 2026
Reseach Article

Data-driven Methodology for Resource Planning in Large-scale Software Development

by Piotr Grobelny
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 141
Year of Publication: 2026
Authors: Piotr Grobelny
10.5120/ijcabae9ce640651

Piotr Grobelny . Data-driven Methodology for Resource Planning in Large-scale Software Development. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 141 ( Sep 2026), 15-22. DOI=10.5120/ijcabae9ce640651

@article{ 10.5120/ijcabae9ce640651,
author = { Piotr Grobelny },
title = { Data-driven Methodology for Resource Planning in Large-scale Software Development },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Sep 2026 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 141 },
month = { Sep },
year = { 2026 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 15-22 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number141/data-driven-methodology-for-resource-planning-in-large-scale-software-development/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijcabae9ce640651 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2026-09-19T02:57:21+05:30
%A Piotr Grobelny
%T Data-driven Methodology for Resource Planning in Large-scale Software Development
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 141
%P 15-22
%D 2026
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Large-scale software development organizations operate in environments characterized by multiple parallel value streams, distributed teams, and dependencies on external stakeholders. Although agile software development enables flexibility, existing project management approaches often provide insufficient support for long-term resource planning across complex portfolios. This paper proposes and validates a data-driven resource planning methodology that bridges project management and agile product development while preserving agile principles and improving planning predictability. The methodology integrates four complementary elements: net capacity estimation, historical data analysis, planning policies, and a planning matrix for allocating resources across multiple value streams. Historical data extracted from work management systems such as Jira are continuously analyzed to estimate task effort and delivery timelines, enabling iterative calibration of planning parameters. The methodology was developed and evaluated through its implementation in a large-scale industrial software development organization. The evaluation demonstrated improved planning accuracy, more effective utilization of development capacity, better coordination of parallel projects, and greater transparency for stakeholders. Continuous refinement of planning parameters based on empirical project data reduced discrepancies between planned and actual workloads while supporting more predictable delivery planning. The results indicate that the proposed methodology provides a practical and scalable framework for resource planning in complex software development environments and establishes a foundation for future research on integrating predictive analytics and intelligent decision-support mechanisms to further enhance planning accuracy and resource allocation.

References
  1. Adam Alami, Mansooreh Zahedi, and Oliver Krancher. The role of psychological safety in promoting software quality in agile teams. Empirical Software Engineering, 29:119, 2024.
  2. Filipe Almeida, Jos´e Sim˜oes, and Sandra Lopes. Large-scale agile frameworks: A comparative review. Journal of Systems and Software, 173:110852, 2021.
  3. E. C. Daraojimba, C. N. Nwasike, A. O. Adegbite, C. A. Ezeigweneme, and J. O. Gidiagba. Comprehensive review of agile methodologies in project management. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 5(1):190–218, 2024.
  4. Helen Edison, Xiaofeng Wang, Pekka Abrahamsson, and Kieran Conboy. Large-scale agile software development: A systematic review and research agenda. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48(8):2731–2753, 2022.
  5. R. D. Estrada-Esponda, M. Lopez-Ben´ıtez, G. Matturro, and J. C. Osorio-Gomez. Selection of software agile practices using analytic hierarchy process. Heliyon, 10:e22948, 2024.
  6. Ahmed Fawzy, Amjed Tahir, Matthias Galster, and Peng Liang. Exploring data management challenges and solutions in agile software development: A literature review and practitioner survey. Empirical Software Engineering, 30:77, 2025.
  7. Nicole Forsgren, Jez Humble, and Gene Kim. Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps: Building and Scaling High Performing Technology Organizations. IT Revolution Press, 2018.
  8. Annabelle Gawer. Digital platforms and ecosystems: Remarks on the dominant organizational forms of the digital age. Journal of Business Research, 144:124–135, 2022.
  9. Mariam G´omez S´anchez, Eduardo Lalla-Ruiz, Alejandro Fern´andez Gil, Carlos Castro, and Stefan Voß. Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 309(3):958–976, 2023.
  10. A. Hossain. A systematic mapping study on scrum and kanban in software development. Master’s thesis, University of Turku, 2023.
  11. L. Mayo-Alvarez, S. Del-Aguila-Arcentales, A. Alvarez-Risco, M. C. Sekar, N. M. Davies, and J. A. Y´a˜nez. Innovation by integration of drum-buffer-rope (dbr) method with scrum-kanban and use of monte carlo simulation for maximizing throughput in agile project management. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10:100228, 2024.
  12. Mary Poppendieck and Tom Poppendieck. Lean Thinking for Software Development. Addison-Wesley, 2013.
  13. M. Poˇzenel, L. F¨urst, D. Vavpotiˇc, and T. Hovelja. Agile effort estimation: Comparing the accuracy and efficiency of planning poker, bucket system, and affinity estimation methods. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 2023.
  14. Abhijit Putta, Maria Paasivaara, and Casper Lassenius. Benefits and challenges of adopting the scaled agile framework (safe): Preliminary results from a multivocal literature review. In Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, pages 334–351. Springer, 2018.
  15. M. Shafique and S. I. Sohail. Pros and cons of implementing agile methodologies on large-scale projects. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences, 3(1):493–510, 2024.
  16. L. Wang, C. Ma, W. Feng, Z. Zhang, H. Liu, Y. Zhao, et al. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science, 18(6):186345, 2024.
  17. Z. Xi, W. Chen, X. Guo, W. Wang, Y. Ge, X. Zhang, et al. The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2309.07864, 2023.
  18. N. Yevtushenko and T. Makarov. Kanban and scrum methods in consulting: Advantages and disadvantages. In Theoretical and Empirical Scientific Research: Concept and Trends. Logos Science, 2024.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Data-driven resource planning agile project management large-scale software development