CFP last date
20 November 2026
Reseach Article

Securing the Decentralized Future: A Comprehensive Survey of Blockchain-Integrated Architectures for Identity, Privacy, and Access Control in Multi-Domain Systems

by Rupsingh Puransingh Mathwale, Ankush D. Sawarkar
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 150
Year of Publication: 2026
Authors: Rupsingh Puransingh Mathwale, Ankush D. Sawarkar
10.5120/ijcaea892d5a439d

Rupsingh Puransingh Mathwale, Ankush D. Sawarkar . Securing the Decentralized Future: A Comprehensive Survey of Blockchain-Integrated Architectures for Identity, Privacy, and Access Control in Multi-Domain Systems. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 150 ( Oct 2026), 1-9. DOI=10.5120/ijcaea892d5a439d

@article{ 10.5120/ijcaea892d5a439d,
author = { Rupsingh Puransingh Mathwale, Ankush D. Sawarkar },
title = { Securing the Decentralized Future: A Comprehensive Survey of Blockchain-Integrated Architectures for Identity, Privacy, and Access Control in Multi-Domain Systems },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Oct 2026 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 150 },
month = { Oct },
year = { 2026 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-9 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number150/securing-the-decentralized-future-a-comprehensive-survey-of-blockchain-integrated-architectures-for-identity-privacy-and-access-control-in-multi-domain-systems/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijcaea892d5a439d },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2026-10-24T03:09:00.140299+05:30
%A Rupsingh Puransingh Mathwale
%A Ankush D. Sawarkar
%T Securing the Decentralized Future: A Comprehensive Survey of Blockchain-Integrated Architectures for Identity, Privacy, and Access Control in Multi-Domain Systems
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 150
%P 1-9
%D 2026
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) devices are increasingly integrated into smart infrastructures, making security, privacy, and access control critical concerns. It is inevitable but to consider confidentiality, Integrity and Availability of IoT devices. There are several security vulnerabilities with the traditional centralized architectures, i.e. single point of failure and concentrated threat surface. Blockchain technology addresses the security challenges posed by centralized architecture. Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology which records transactions taking place on the network. Bitcoin is the proven application of blockchain technology. Blockchain is an immutable, add only ledger of blocks of transactions. This secure and resilient aspect of blockchain could be utilized in various non cryptocurrency applications as well. This survey provides a thorough analysis of blockchain applications across various domains, including healthcare (Internet of Medical Things [IoMT]) for securing clinical data and vehicular networks (Internet of Vehicles [IoV]) for reliable message transfer. Blockchain could significantly affect the way in which Identity and access Management works through adaptation of Self Sovereign Identity (SSI) and Decentralized Identifiers (DID), which shifts the control of the identity data at user end, and it could be used in Know Your Customer(eKYC) processes as well. For network resource management, blockchain integrates seamlessly with federated learning, 5G, and metaverse platforms. Despite these benefits, scalability limitations and transaction latency remain major concerns in blockchain-based solutions. In addition to multi-domain applications, the paper examines decentralized authentication paradigms, Zero Trust Architectures (ZTA), and post-quantum privacy-preserving primitives. By mitigating domain specific issues, Blockchain technology could act as a promising tool in securing decentralized systems.

References
  1. L. D. Xu, Y. Lu, and L. Li. Embedding blockchain technology into IoT for security: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(13):10452–10473, 2021.
  2. A. A. Jolfaei, S. F. Aghili, and D. Singelee. A survey on blockchain-based IoMT systems: Towards scalability. IEEE Access, 9:148948–148975, 2021.
  3. A. H. Allam, I. Gomaa, H. H. Zayed, and M. Taha. IoT-based eHealth using blockchain technology: A survey. Cluster Computing, 27(6):7083–7110, 2024.
  4. L. Zheng, T. Feng, Z. Xie, X. Li, and C. Su. BARM: Blockchain-assisted anonymous authentication and reputation management for mobile crowdsensing in Internet of Vehicles. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025. early access.
  5. A. El-Fatyany, J. Mahmood, M. A. Berwo, X. Wang, L. Lu, Q. Xue, and K. Ren. Intrusion detection and prevention for intra- and inter-vehicle networks: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2026. early access.
  6. R. Alkadi, N. Alnuaimi, C. Y. Yeun, and A. Shoufan. Blockchain interoperability in unmanned aerial vehicles networks: State-of-the-art and open issues. IEEE Access, 10:14463–14479, 2022.
  7. H. Gharavi, J. Granjal, and E. Monteiro. Post-quantum blockchain security for the Internet of Things: Survey and research directions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(3):1748–1774, 2024.
  8. N. F. Syed, S. W. Shah, A. Shaghaghi, A. Anwar, Z. Baig, and R. Doss. Zero trust architecture (ZTA): A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access, 10:57143–57179, 2022.
  9. I. Ahmed, K. Toyoda, T. Nakano, S. Kasahara, S. R. Goyal, and T. H. Tran. A systematic review on blockchain-enabled eKYC: Leveraging SSI and DID for secure and efficient identity verification. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025. early access.
  10. A. S. Al-Mulla and M. H. Ali. Privacy-aware blockchainbased access control architecture for securing edge-computed Internet of Things node data pipelines. ITEGAM-Journal of Engineering and Technology for Industrial Applications, 12(58):45–54, 2026.
  11. O. A. Bello and K. M. Yusuf. Risk management and governance frameworks in blockchain-based decentralized identity projects. ITEGAM-Journal of Engineering and Technology for Industrial Applications, 11(54):172–180, 2025.
  12. X. Zhou et al. Decentralized federated graph learning with lightweight zero trust architecture for next-generation networking security. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 43(6):1908–1922, June 2025.
  13. T. A. Alghamdi, R. Khalid, and N. Javaid. A survey of blockchain-based systems: Scalability issues and solutions, applications and future challenges. IEEE Access, 12:79626– 79651, 2024.
  14. S. K. Nair, V. Sharma, and P. K. Gupta. BlockArc: A blockchain based smart contract for reward verification in automated edge environments. ITEGAM-Journal of Engineering and Technology for Industrial Applications, 11(54):181– 192, 2025.
  15. Satoshi Nakamoto. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Technical report, Bitcoin.org, 2008.
  16. Vitalik Buterin. Ethereum white paper. GitHub Repository, 1:5–7, 2013.
  17. Gavin Wood. Polkadot: Vision for a heterogeneous multichain framework. White Paper, 21:4662, 2016.
  18. Christian Cachin. Architecture of the Hyperledger blockchain fabric. In Proc. Workshop Distrib. Cryptocurrencies Consensus Ledgers, pages 1–4, 2016.
  19. J. Liu. Blockchain meets AI in healthcare: A review of convergent technologies for digital health transformation. Frontiers in Blockchain, 9, 2026.
  20. I. Butun and P. Osterberg. A review of distributed access control for blockchain systems towards securing the Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 9:5428–5441, 2021.
  21. E. A. Shammar, A. T. Zahary, and A. A. Al-Shargabi. A survey of IoT and blockchain integration: Security perspective. IEEE Access, 9:156114–156150, 2021.
  22. Y. Jiang, B. Ma, X. Wang, G. Yu, P. Yu, Z. Wang, W. Ni, and R. P. Liu. Blockchained federated learning for Internet of Things: A comprehensive survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(10):1–37, 2024.
  23. J.P. Morgan. Quorum whitepaper v0.2. Technical report, ConsenSys Quorum Repository, 2016.
  24. A. Gervais, G. O. Karame, K. W¨ust, V. Glykantzis, H. Ritzdorf, and S. Capkun. On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains. In Proc. ACM SIGSAC Conf. Comput. Commun. Secur., pages 3–16, 2016.
  25. F. Saleh. Blockchain without waste: Proof-of-stake. Review of Financial Studies, 34(3):1156–1190, 2021.
  26. M. Castro and B. Liskov. Practical Byzantine fault tolerance. In Proc. 3rd Symp. Operating Syst. Design Implement. (OSDI), pages 173–186, 1999.
  27. D. Larimer. Delegated proof of stake consensus. White paper, BitShares, 2014.
  28. Hyperledger Labs. Proof of elapsed time 2 (PoET2) lab specification. Technical report, Linux Foundation Decentralized Trust Labs, 2020.
  29. A. Ekblaw et al. MedRec: Blockchain for medical data access, permission management and trend analysis. MIT Media Lab, 2016.
  30. HealthChain. HealthChain official website. https:// healthchain.com/, 2026. Accessed: May 2026.
  31. J. Zhang, Y. Jiang, J. Cui, D. He, I. Bolodurina, and H. Zhong. DBCPA: Dual blockchain-assisted conditional privacy-preserving authentication framework and protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 23(2):1127–1141, 2022.
  32. A. Vangala, B. Bera, S. Saha, A. K. Das, N. Kumar, and Y. Park. Blockchain-enabled certificate-based authentication for vehicle accident detection and notification in intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(14):15824–15838, 2021.
  33. A. Jain, S. Barke, M. Garg, A. Gupta, B. Narwal, A. K. Mohapatra, D. K. Sharma, and G. Srivastava. A walkthrough of blockchain-based Internet of Drones architectures. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 11(21):34924–34940, 2024.
  34. A. Padma and M. Ramaiah. Blockchain-based an efficient and secure privacy-preserved framework for smart cities. IEEE Access, 12:21985–22002, 2024.
  35. Ryoshi. The Shiba Inu WoofPaper: An experiment in decentralized spontaneous community building. White paper, v2, Shiba Inu, 2021.
  36. I. Makhdoom, I. Zhou, M. Abolhasan, J. Lipman, and W. Ni. PrivySharing: A blockchain-based framework for privacypreserving and secure data sharing in smart cities. Computers & Security, 88:101653, 2020.
  37. Datapace Team. Datapace: Decentralized data marketplace based on blockchain and global network of sensors. White paper, Nokia Open Ecosystem Network, 2019.
  38. N. Mansoor, K. F. Antora, P. Deb, T. A. Arman, A. A. Manaf, and M. Zareei. A review of blockchain approaches for KYC. IEEE Access, 11:121013–121042, 2023.
  39. N. Bitansky, R. Canetti, A. Chiesa, and E. Tromer. From garbled circuits to efficient zero-knowledge arguments for NP. In Proc. 32nd Annu. Cryptol. Conf. (CRYPTO), pages 326–345, 2012.
  40. E. Ben-Sasson, I. Bentov, Y. Horesh, and M. Riabzev. Scalable, transparent, and post-quantum secure computational integrity. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2018:46, 2018.
  41. T. Golomb, Y. Mirsky, and Y. Elovici. CIoTA: Collaborative IoT anomaly detection via blockchain. In Proc. NDSS Workshop Decentralized IoT Secur. Privacy (DISP), 2018.
  42. T. T. Baladraf and M. Marimin. Potential adoption of blockchain in food cold supply chain: A bibliometric study and future research agenda. ITEGAM-Journal of Engineering and Technology for Industrial Applications, 11(52):112–125, 2025.
  43. H. Uppala and R. R. Devi. AES-enhanced blockchain intrusion detection system for secure networks. ITEGAM-Journal of Engineering and Technology for Industrial Applications, 12(58):12–21, 2026.
  44. M. Antonakakis et al. Understanding the Mirai botnet. In Proc. 26th USENIX Security Symposium, pages 1093–1110, 2017.
  45. J. Pan, J. Wang, A. Hester, I. Alqerm, Y. Liu, and Y. Zhao. EdgeChain: An edge-IoT framework and prototype based on blockchain and smart contracts. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(3):4719–4732, 2019.
  46. J. Wang, J. Wang, Q. Zhang, and H. Wang. BlockFedML: Blockchained federated machine learning systems. In Proc. Cyber-Enabled Distrib. Comput. Knowl. Discov. (CyberC), pages 162–169, 2019.
  47. Z. Abou El Houda, A. S. Hafid, and L. Khoukhi. Co-IoT: A collaborative DDoS mitigation scheme in IoT environment based on blockchain using SDN. In Proc. IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pages 1–6, 2019.
  48. P. W. Shor. Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring. In Proc. 35th Annu. Symp. Found. Comput. Sci. (FOCS), pages 124–134, 1994.
  49. L. K. Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proc. 28th Annu. ACM Symp. Theory Comput. (STOC), pages 212–219, 1996.
  50. J. Bos, L. Ducas, E. Kiltz, T. Lepoint, V. Lyubashevsky, J. M. Schanck, P. Schwabe, G. Seiler, and D. Stehl´e. CRYSTALSKyber: A CCA-secure module-lattice-based KEM. In Proc. IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS& P), pages 353–367, 2018.
  51. L. Ducas, E. Kiltz, T. Lepoint, V. Lyubashevsky, P. Schwabe, G. Seiler, and D. Stehl´e. CRYSTALS-Dilithium: A latticebased digital signature scheme. IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, 2018(1):238– 268, 2018.
  52. D. J. Bernstein, A. H¨ulsing, S. K¨olbl, R. Niederhagen, J. Rijneveld, and P. Schwabe. The SPHINCS+ signature framework. In Proc. ACM SIGSAC Conf. Comput. Commun. Secur. (CCS), pages 2129–2146, 2019.
  53. A. H¨ulsing. WOTS+ — shorter signatures for XMSS and SPHINCS. In Proc. Int. Conf. Post-Quantum Cryptogr. (PQCrypto), pages 141–155, 2013.
  54. R. J. McEliece. A public-key cryptosystem based on algebraic coding theory. Technical Report DSN Progress Report 42-44, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 1978.
  55. D. Jao and L. De Feo. Towards quantum-resistant cryptosystems from supersingular elliptic curve isogenies. In Proc. 4th Int. Workshop Post-Quantum Cryptogr. (PQCrypto), pages 19–34, 2011.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Blockchain IoT Privacy Security Access Control