CFP last date
20 May 2025
Reseach Article

Text to Sign Language Translator –Two Implementations

by Durgadevi Yenuganti, Nikhitha Kasha, Pavan Subhash Chandrabose Nara, Suhair Amer
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2025
Authors: Durgadevi Yenuganti, Nikhitha Kasha, Pavan Subhash Chandrabose Nara, Suhair Amer
10.5120/ijca2025924804

Durgadevi Yenuganti, Nikhitha Kasha, Pavan Subhash Chandrabose Nara, Suhair Amer . Text to Sign Language Translator –Two Implementations. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 2 ( May 2025), 55-61. DOI=10.5120/ijca2025924804

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2025924804,
author = { Durgadevi Yenuganti, Nikhitha Kasha, Pavan Subhash Chandrabose Nara, Suhair Amer },
title = { Text to Sign Language Translator –Two Implementations },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2025 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 2 },
month = { May },
year = { 2025 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 55-61 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number2/text-to-sign-language-translator-two-implementations/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2025924804 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2025-05-17T02:45:32.680455+05:30
%A Durgadevi Yenuganti
%A Nikhitha Kasha
%A Pavan Subhash Chandrabose Nara
%A Suhair Amer
%T Text to Sign Language Translator –Two Implementations
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 2
%P 55-61
%D 2025
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the projects of two students projects focused on developing text-to-American Sign Language (ASL) finger spelling translation systems. Both projects successfully convert English text into corresponding ASL hand shape images, but they differ in their technological approaches and implementation complexities. Project 1 utilizes PHP for a simpler implementation, while Project 2 employs Python and Flask for a more robust and scalable solution. The comparison highlights the diverse approaches and technologies that can be employed for sign language translation, emphasizing the importance of user-centered design and evaluation in developing accessible technologies for the Deaf community. The evaluations of both projects, while differing in methodology, reveal positive user experiences and identify areas for improvement, such as handling special characters and incorporating additional features. The students completed the development in one month as an end of semester project.

References
  1. Wikipedia contributors. American sign language, 2025. URL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Sign_Language. Accessed: 2025-02-25.
  2. Necati Cihan Camgoz, Oscar Koller, Simon Hadfield, and R. Bowden. Sign language transformers: Joint end-to-end sign language recognition and translation. 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10020–10030, 2020. URL https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:214728269.
  3. Hao Zhou, Wen gang Zhou, Weizhen Qi, Junfu Pu, and Houqiang Li. Improving sign language translation with monolingual data by sign back-translation. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 1316–1325, 2021. URL https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:235195736.
  4. Sandra Baldassarri, Eva Cerezo, and Francisco Royo-Santas. Automatic translation system to spanish sign language with a virtual interpreter. volume 5726, pages 196–199, 08 2009.ISBN 978-3-642-03654-5. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2 23.
  5. Daiga Straupeniece, Dina Bethere, and Elza Ozola. Sign lan-guage of the deaf people: A study on public understanding. Education. Innovation. Diversity., 2:109–114, 12 2023. doi: 10.17770/eid2023.2.7356.
  6. Hicham Abdelouafi. The necessity for research on indigenous sign languages to enrich africa’s deaf communities. 11 2024.
  7. Kirsten Bergmann. The production of co-speech iconic ges-tures: Empirical study and computational simulation with vir-tual agents. 2012. URL https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:36814279.
  8. Clayton Valli and Ceil Lucas. Linguistics of American Sign Language: an introduction. Gallaudet University Press, Washington, D.C., 3rd ed. edition, 2000. URL https: //cmc.marmot.org/EbscoAcademicCMC/ocm57352333. eBook, Available Online, Ebsco Academic (CMC).
  9. Parteek Bhatia, Sugandhi Verma, and Sanmeet Kaur. Sign language generation system based on indian sign language grammar. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing, 01 2020.
  10. Ida Bagus, Nyoman Wairagya, Putu Wira Buana, and I Made Sukarsa. Development of english-to-sign-language trans-lation system on android. 2019. URL https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:212584311.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Sign Language Translation Finger spelling American Sign Language (ASL) PHP Python Flask User Interface Evaluation Accessibility Assistive Technology