CFP last date
20 August 2025
Call for Paper
September Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming September edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 August 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Assessing LLMs as Cognitive Interpreters of Student Prompts: A Typological Framework

Tadeu da Ponte Matevz Vremec Matej Mertik
Random Articles
Reseach Article

System Design for AI Engineering: Adaptive Architectures for Real-World Scalable AI Applications

by Abhishek Shukla
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 25
Year of Publication: 2025
Authors: Abhishek Shukla
10.5120/ijca2025925445

Abhishek Shukla . System Design for AI Engineering: Adaptive Architectures for Real-World Scalable AI Applications. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 25 ( Jul 2025), 34-39. DOI=10.5120/ijca2025925445

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2025925445,
author = { Abhishek Shukla },
title = { System Design for AI Engineering: Adaptive Architectures for Real-World Scalable AI Applications },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jul 2025 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 25 },
month = { Jul },
year = { 2025 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 34-39 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number25/system-design-for-ai-engineering-adaptive-architectures-for-real-world-scalable-ai-applications/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2025925445 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2025-07-31T02:40:02.785106+05:30
%A Abhishek Shukla
%T System Design for AI Engineering: Adaptive Architectures for Real-World Scalable AI Applications
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 25
%P 34-39
%D 2025
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) necessitates robust system architectures to ensure scalability, reliability, and efficiency across diverse applications. This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for designing AI engineering systems, addressing critical components such as data pipelines, computer architectures, model serving, distributed training, and emerging patterns like federated learning and serverless AI. We introduce novel orchestration techniques, hybrid cloud-edge architectures, and ethical considerations to enhance system robustness. Through detailed case studies on recommendation systems, autonomous driving, and healthcare diagnostics, we illustrate practical implementations and analyze trade-offs. Challenges such as data privacy, resource optimization, and model governance are explored, with future directions emphasizing sustainable AI and quantum computing. This framework serves as a blueprint for engineers building next-generation AI systems.

References
  1. J. Dean, “The deep learning revolution and its implications for computer architecture and chip design,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conf., San Francisco, CA, USA, 2018, pp. 8–14.
  2. D. Sculley et al., “Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Montreal, QC, Canada, 2015, pp. 2503–2511.
  3. Amazon Web Services, “AWS machine learning architecture guide,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://aws. amazon.com/architecture/machine-learning/
  4. S. Rajbhandari et al., “ZeRO: Memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Supercomput., Barcelona, Spain, 2020, pp. 1–12.
  5. H. B. McMahan et al., “Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,” in Proc. Artif. Intell. Statist., Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 2017, pp. 1273–1282.
  6. C. Dwork and A. Roth, “The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy,” Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3–4, pp. 211–407, 2014.
  7. G. Hinton, O. Vinyals, and J. Dean, “Distilling the knowledge in a neural network,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2015.
  8. Evidently AI, “Monitoring machine learning models in production,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //evidentlyai.com/docs
  9. S. Barocas, M. Hardt, and A. Narayanan, Fairness and Machine Learning, 2019. [Online]. Available: https:// fairmlbook.org
  10. E. Strubell, A. Ganesh, and A. McCallum, “Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP,” in Proc. 57th Annu. Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics, Florence, Italy, 2019, pp. 3645–3650.
  11. J. Biamonte et al., “Quantum machine learning,” Nature, vol. 549, no. 7671, pp. 195–202, 2017.
  12. M. Davies et al., “Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning,” IEEE Micro, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 82–99, 2018.
  13. T. Baltrusaitis, C. Ahuja, and L.-P. Morency, “Multimodal machine learning: A survey and taxonomy,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 423–443, 2018.
  14. T. Elsken, J. H. Metzen, and F. Hutter, “Neural architecture search: A survey,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 20, no. 55, pp. 1–21, 2019.
  15. T. B. Brown et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2020, pp. 1877–1901.
  16. A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Long Beach, CA, USA, 2017, pp. 5998–6008.
  17. K. He et al., “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2016, pp. 770–778.
  18. I. Goodfellow et al., “Generative adversarial nets,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Montreal, QC, Canada, 2014, pp. 2672–2680.
  19. A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Lake Tahoe, NV, USA, 2012, pp. 1097–1105.
  20. Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015.
  21. D. Silver et al., “Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search,” Nature, vol. 529, no. 7587, pp. 484–489, 2016.
  22. V. Mnih et al., “Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning,” Nature, vol. 518, no. 7540, pp. 529–533, 2015.
  23. A. Radford et al., “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” OpenAI Blog, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://openai.com/blog/ better-language-models/
  24. J. Devlin et al., “BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” in Proc. Conf. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2019, pp. 4171– 4186.
  25. A. Dosovitskiy et al., “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., 2021.
  26. A. Ramesh et al., “Zero-shot text-to-image generation,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2021, pp. 8821–8831.
  27. J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2020, pp. 6840–6851.
  28. T. Chen et al., “A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2020, pp. 1597–1607.
  29. J. Schulman et al., “Proximal policy optimization algorithms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347, 2017.
  30. O. Vinyals et al., “Grandmaster level in StarCraft II using multi-agent reinforcement learning,” Nature, vol. 575, no. 7782, pp. 350–354, 2019.
  31. P. Abbeel, “Reinforcement learning in the real world,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Xi’an, China, 2021, pp. 1–5.
  32. Z. Lan et al., “ALBERT: A lite BERT for self-supervised learning of language representations,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., 2020.
  33. Y. Liu et al., “RoBERTa: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692, 2019.
  34. Z. Yang et al., “XLNet: Generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2019, pp. 5754–5764.
  35. K. Clark et al., “ELECTRA: Pre-training text encoders as discriminators rather than generators,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., 2020.
  36. C. Raffel et al., “Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 21, no. 140, pp. 1–67, 2020.
  37. J. Zhang et al., “PEGASUS: Pre-training with extracted gap-sentences for abstractive summarization,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2020, pp. 11328– 11339.
  38. M. Lewis et al., “BART: Denoising sequence-tosequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension,” in Proc. 58th Annu. Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics, 2020, pp. 7871– 7880.
  39. L. Xu et al., “A survey of federated learning frameworks,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 187871–187894, 2020.
  40. P. Kairouz et al., “Advances and open problems in federated learning,” Found. Trends Mach. Learn., vol. 14, no. 1–2, pp. 1–210, 2021.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

AI Engineering System Design Scalable AI Distributed Systems Model Serving Federated Learning Cloud-Edge Architectures

Powered by PhDFocusTM