CFP last date
20 October 2025
Call for Paper
November Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming November edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 October 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Digital Twin-Enabled Anomaly Detection for Industrial IoT using Explainable AI

by Mohammad Abu Kausar
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 37
Year of Publication: 2025
Authors: Mohammad Abu Kausar
10.5120/ijca2025925641

Mohammad Abu Kausar . Digital Twin-Enabled Anomaly Detection for Industrial IoT using Explainable AI. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 37 ( Sep 2025), 47-55. DOI=10.5120/ijca2025925641

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2025925641,
author = { Mohammad Abu Kausar },
title = { Digital Twin-Enabled Anomaly Detection for Industrial IoT using Explainable AI },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Sep 2025 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 37 },
month = { Sep },
year = { 2025 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 47-55 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number37/digital-twin-enabled-anomaly-detection-for-industrial-iot-using-explainable-ai/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2025925641 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2025-09-23T00:35:17.165238+05:30
%A Mohammad Abu Kausar
%T Digital Twin-Enabled Anomaly Detection for Industrial IoT using Explainable AI
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 37
%P 47-55
%D 2025
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

A hybrid approach is then introduced in this paper to combine the DT technology with XAI to detect the anomaly in IIoT environment in real time. The system also integrates high-fidelity simulation models with sensor data in order to increase the accuracy of detection and decrease the number of false positives. It leverages SHAP-based explanations, counterfactual deliberation, and natural language normalization to render the system interpretable for the engineers or operators in charge of decision making. Experimental results on real industrial datasets achieve a detection accuracy of 95.3% and 78% of reduction in false positives with respect to the state of the art. The promising performance of XAI-DT integration with a decision-supported mechanism demonstrates its application value for reliable and transparent predictive maintenance in industrial domain.

References
  1. L. Monostori, "Cyber-physical production systems: Roots, expectations and R&D challenges," Procedia CIRP, vol. 17, pp. 9–13, 2014.
  2. M. Grieves and J. Vickers, "Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems," in Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, Springer, 2017, pp. 85–113.
  3. F. Doshi-Velez and B. Kim, "Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning," arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608, 2017.
  4. Md. Abu Kausar, V. S. Dhaka, and S. K. Singh, "Web Crawler: A Review," International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 31–36, 2013.
  5. E. Mikołajewska, D. Mikołajewski, T. Mikołajczyk, and T. Paczkowski, “Generative AI in AI-Based Digital Twins for Fault Diagnosis for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0/5.0,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 3166, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/6/3166
  6. ResearchGate, “Digital Twins in the IIoT: Current Practices and Future Directions Toward Industry 5.0,” ResearchGate, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391211780
  7. Frontiers, “Explainable correlation-based anomaly detection for Industrial Control Systems,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/artificial-intelligence/articles/10.3389/frai.2024.1508821/full
  8. Brage NMBU, “Anomaly detection in industrial time series sensor data,” Master’s Thesis, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://nmbu.brage.unit.no/nmbu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/3076750/no.nmbu%3Awiseflow%3A6839553%3A54592050.pdf
  9. PROMPT, “Lesson 114: SHAP and LIME,” AI-Prompt Journal, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://service.ai-prompt.jp/en/article/ai365-114/
  10. I. Taha and R. Barham, “Explainable AI: Using Shapley Value to Explain Complex Anomaly Detection ML-Based Systems,” ResearchGate, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347324639
  11. BIG Conferences, “AI Explainability Methods in Digital Twins: A Model and a Use Case,” BIWEEK 2024 Conference Proceedings, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://conferences.big.tuwien.ac.at/biweek2024/pdfs/biweek2024_paper_91.pdf
  12. A. De Benedictis, F. Flammini, N. Mazzocca, A. Somma, and F. Vitale, “Digital Twins for Anomaly Detection in the Industrial Internet of Things: Conceptual Architecture and Proof-of-Concept,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., accepted for publication, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368728148
  13. InnovateEnergy, “How Digital Twins and AI Are Powering the Next Industrial Leap,” InnovateEnergy Journal, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://innovateenergynow.com/resources/how-digital-twins-and-ai-are-powering-the-next-industrial-leap
  14. ResearchGate, “Digital Twin-Assisted Anomaly Detection for Industrial Scenarios,” Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot., vol. 47, no. 4, p. 100721, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385191780
  15. E. Mikołajewska, D. Mikołajewski, T. Mikołajczyk, and T. Paczkowski, “Generative AI in AI-Based Digital Twins for Fault Diagnosis for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0/5.0,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 3166, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/6/3166
  16. ResearchGate, “Digital Twin-Assisted Anomaly Detection for Industrial Scenarios,” Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot., vol. 47, no. 4, p. 100721, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385191780
  17. C. Alcaraz and J. Lopez, “Digital Twin-Assisted Anomaly Detection for Industrial Scenarios,” Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot., vol. 47, p. 100721, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijocip/v47y2024ics1874548224000623.html
  18. L. Lamberti, F. Cignetti, and M. Sacco, “Integration of Digital Twin, Machine-Learning and Industry 4.0 Tools for Anomaly Detection: An Application to a Food Plant,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 11, p. 4143, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/11/4143
  19. M. A. Faheem and N. U. Prince, “AI-Driven Anomaly Detection in IT Systems Using Digital Twins and NLP,” ResearchGate, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388959580
  20. F. Malm, “Explainable AI for Time Series Anomaly Detection,” Master’s Thesis, DiVA portal, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1972404/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  21. Y. Zhan and J. Chen, “Explainable Deep Learning for Time Series Analysis: Integrating SHAP and LIME in LSTM-Based Models,” J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Manag., vol. 9, no. 3, p. 2627, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://jisem-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/2627/1031
  22. F. Rossi, “AI and Digital Twins,” People – UNIPI, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://people.unipi.it/federico_rossi/ai-and-digital-twins/
  23. Y. Wang and J. Huang, “Interpretable Anomaly Detection for Industrial Equipment based on Attention Mechanism,” J. Manuf. Syst., preprint, 2024.
  24. G. Vasileiadis et al., “Interactive Explainable Anomaly Detection for Industrial Settings,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2410.12817, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/html/2410.12817v1
  25. P. Kumar and A. Singh, “A Survey on Explainable AI for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0,” J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., preprint, 2024.
  26. A. Abbas et al., “Explainable AI for Forensic Analysis: A Comparative Study of SHAP and LIME in Intrusion Detection Models,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 13, p. 7329, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/13/7329
  27. BIG Conferences, “AI Explainability Methods in Digital Twins: A Model and a Use Case,” BIWEEK 2024 Conf. Proc., 2024. [Online]. Available: https://conferences.big.tuwien.ac.at/biweek2024/pdfs/biweek2024_paper_91.pdf
  28. Y. Wu and Q. Zhang, “A Digital Twin-Enabled Cyber-Physical System for Smart Manufacturing with Enhanced Anomaly Detection and Interpretability,” Int. J. Prod. Res., preprint, 2024.
  29. L. Zhou and Y. Liu, “Real-time Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems using Digital Twin and Causal Inference with XAI,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.: Syst., accepted for publication, 2024.
  30. J. Park and S. Kim, “An Explainable Digital Twin Framework for Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Industrial Robots,” Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., accepted for publication, 2024.
  31. R. Niu and S. Guo, “Knowledge Graph and Digital Twin based Explainable Anomaly Detection for Complex Industrial Equipment,” J. Intell. Manuf., accepted for publication, 2024.
  32. M. Franco de la Peña et al., “ShaTS: A Shapley-based Explainability Method for Time Series Artificial Intelligence Models applied to Anomaly Detection in Industrial Internet of Things,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2506.01450, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.01450
  33. S. Gao and Y. Li, “Counterfactual Explanations for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series Data,” Expert Syst. Appl., preprint, 2024.
  34. X. Li et al., “Towards Transparent and Trustworthy Anomaly Detection in IIoT: A Federated Learning and XAI Approach,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., accepted for publication, 2024.
  35. Md. Abu Kausar, Md. Nasar, and S. K. Singh, "Information Retrieval using Soft Computing: An overview," 2013.
  36. NASA Prognostics Center of Excellence, “Prognostics Data Set Repository,” Ames Intelligent Systems Division, NASA Ames Research Center, accessed: Jul. 25, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.nasa.gov/intelligent-systems-division/discovery-and-systems-health/pcoe/pcoe-data-set-repository/
  37. C. A. Rieth, B. D. Amsel, R. Tran, and M. B. Cook, “Additional Tennessee Eastman Process Simulation Data for Anomaly Detection Evaluation,” Harvard Dataverse, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.7910/DVN/6C3JR1 [Online]. Available: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/6C3JR1
  38. V. Arzamasov, “Electrical Grid Stability Simulated Data,” UCI Machine Learning Repository, Dataset no. 471, Nov. 15, 2018. [Dataset]. Available: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Electrical+Grid+Stability+Simulated+Data (DOI: 10.24432/C5PG66)
  39. Md. Abu Kausar, Md. Nasar, and S. K. Singh, "Maintaining the repository of search engine from irregular web pages," in Proc. Int. Conf. Emerging Trends in Computer and Electronics Engineering, 2013, pp. 1–6.
  40. Md. Abu Kausar, V. S. Dhaka, and S. K. Singh, "Web crawler based on mobile agent and java aglets," IJ Information Technology and Computer Science, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 85–91, 2013.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Digital Twin Anomaly Detection Industrial IoT Explainable AI Predictive Maintenance