CFP last date
20 March 2026
Call for Paper
April Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming April edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 March 2026

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Explainable Hybrid Deep Learning for Automated Diagnosis of Canine Mammary Tumors

Elham Shawky Salama Heba Askr Ashraf Darwish Aboul Ella Hassanien
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Compliance Challenges in AI-Driven IT Infrastructure: A Framework for Mitigation and Governance

by Chisom Elizabeth Alozie, Chinelo Patience Umeanozie, Taiwo Paul Onyekwuluje, Elizabeth Ujunwa Ekine
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 78
Year of Publication: 2026
Authors: Chisom Elizabeth Alozie, Chinelo Patience Umeanozie, Taiwo Paul Onyekwuluje, Elizabeth Ujunwa Ekine
10.5120/ijca2026926338

Chisom Elizabeth Alozie, Chinelo Patience Umeanozie, Taiwo Paul Onyekwuluje, Elizabeth Ujunwa Ekine . Compliance Challenges in AI-Driven IT Infrastructure: A Framework for Mitigation and Governance. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 78 ( Feb 2026), 63-85. DOI=10.5120/ijca2026926338

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2026926338,
author = { Chisom Elizabeth Alozie, Chinelo Patience Umeanozie, Taiwo Paul Onyekwuluje, Elizabeth Ujunwa Ekine },
title = { Compliance Challenges in AI-Driven IT Infrastructure: A Framework for Mitigation and Governance },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Feb 2026 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 78 },
month = { Feb },
year = { 2026 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 63-85 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number78/compliance-challenges-in-ai-driven-it-infrastructure-a-framework-for-mitigation-and-governance/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2026926338 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2026-02-21T01:27:41.138007+05:30
%A Chisom Elizabeth Alozie
%A Chinelo Patience Umeanozie
%A Taiwo Paul Onyekwuluje
%A Elizabeth Ujunwa Ekine
%T Compliance Challenges in AI-Driven IT Infrastructure: A Framework for Mitigation and Governance
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 78
%P 63-85
%D 2026
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into IT infrastructure has revolutionized organizational operations while simultaneously introducing complex compliance challenges that threaten data privacy, security, and regulatory adherence. This study examines the multifaceted compliance obstacles organizations encounter when deploying AI-driven IT systems, with particular emphasis on healthcare and financial sectors where regulatory requirements are most stringent. Through a comprehensive analysis of existing frameworks and empirical evidence from 45 organizations across multiple jurisdictions, this research identifies critical gaps in current governance models and proposes an integrated framework for compliance mitigation. The findings reveal that 73% of organizations struggle with data privacy compliance, 68% face challenges in algorithmic transparency, and 61% report difficulties in cross-border regulatory adherence. The proposed framework incorporates risk-based governance, continuous monitoring mechanisms, and adaptive compliance protocols specifically designed for AI-driven environments. This research contributes to both academic discourse and practical implementation by providing actionable strategies for organizations navigating the complex intersection of AI innovation and regulatory compliance. The study concludes that successful AI adoption requires proactive governance structures that balance technological advancement with robust compliance mechanisms.

References
  1. Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I., & Zaharia, M. (2010). A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1721654.1721672
  2. Arnold, M., Bellamy, R. K., Hind, M., Houde, S., Mehta, S., Mojsilović, A., Nair, R., Ramamurthy, K. N., Olteanu, A., Piorkowski, D., Reimer, D., Richards, J., Tsay, J., & Varshney, K. R. (2019). FactSheets: Increasing trust in AI services through supplier's declarations of conformity. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 63(4/5), 6:1-6:13. https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2019.2942288
  3. Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2019). Fairness and machine learning: Limitations and opportunities. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12200.001.0001
  4. Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review, 104(3), 671-732. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38BG31
  5. Bellamy, R. K., Dey, K., Hind, M., Hoffman, S. C., Houde, S., Kannan, K., Lohia, P., Martino, J., Mehta, S., Mojsilović, A., Nagar, S., Ramamurthy, K. N., Richards, J., Saha, D., Sattigeri, P., Singh, M., Varshney, K. R., & Zhang, Y. (2019). AI Fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting and mitigating algorithmic bias. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 63(4/5), 4:1-4:15. https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2019.2942287
  6. Benbya, H., Davenport, T. H., & Pachidi, S. (2021). Special issue editorial: Artificial intelligence in organizations: Current state and future opportunities. MIS Quarterly Executive, 20(4), iii-xi. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00035
  7. Blackman, R. (2020). A practical guide to building ethical AI. Harvard Business Review, 98(6), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.3917/hbr.202006.0086
  8. Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels Effect: How the European Union rules the world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001
  9. Brummer, C., & Yadav, Y. (2019). Fintech and the innovation trilemma. Georgetown Law Journal, 107(2), 235-308. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3054770
  10. Brundage, M., Avin, S., Wang, J., Belfield, H., Krueger, G., Hadfield, G., Khlaaf, H., Yang, J., Toner, H., Fong, R., Maharaj, T., Koh, P. W., Hooker, S., Leung, J., Trask, A., Bluemke, E., Lebensold, J., O'Keefe, C., Koren, M., ... Anderljung, M. (2020). Toward trustworthy AI development: Mechanisms for supporting verifiable claims. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.07213. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.07213
  11. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The business of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review, 95(4), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11645.003.0004
  12. Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine 'thinks': Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512
  13. Butterworth, M. (2018). The ICO and artificial intelligence: The role of fairness in the GDPR framework. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.004
  14. Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the 'good society': The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7
  15. Chen, M., Mao, S., & Liu, Y. (2020). Big data: A survey. Mobile Networks and Applications, 19(2), 171-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-013-0489-0
  16. Cihon, P., Maas, M. M., & Kemp, L. (2021). Fragmentation and the future: Investigating architectures for international AI governance. Global Policy, 12(S6), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12890
  17. Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). Artificial intelligence, responsibility attribution, and a relational justification of explainability. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2051-2068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00146-8
  18. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108318066
  19. Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2018.2882984
  20. Dignum, V. (2019). Responsible artificial intelligence: How to develop and use AI in a responsible way. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30371-6
  21. Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3-4), 211-407. https://doi.org/10.1561/0400000042
  22. Edwards, L., & Veale, M. (2017). Slave to the algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for. Duke Law & Technology Review, 16(1), 18-84. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2972855
  23. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence. COM(2021) 206 final. https://doi.org/10.2833/469433
  24. European Data Protection Board. (2023). Annual Report 2022. EDPB. https://doi.org/10.2804/254934
  25. Fjeld, J., Achten, N., Hilligoss, H., Nagy, A., & Srikumar, M. (2020). Principled artificial intelligence: Mapping consensus in ethical and rights-based approaches to principles for AI. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication, 2020-1. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3518482
  26. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
  27. Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2018). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458723
  28. Goodman, B., & Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation". AI Magazine, 38(3), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741
  29. Habib, S. M., Ries, S., & Mühlhäuser, M. (2022). Cloud computing landscape and research challenges regarding trust and reputation. Future Generation Computer Systems, 130, 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.12.013
  30. Halevy, A., Norvig, P., & Pereira, F. (2016). The unreasonable effectiveness of data. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 24(2), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2009.36
  31. Helbing, D., Frey, B. S., Gigerenzer, G., Hafen, E., Hagner, M., Hofstetter, Y., van den Hoven, J., Zicari, R. V., & Zwitter, A. (2019). Will democracy survive big data and artificial intelligence? In D. Helbing (Ed.), Towards digital enlightenment (pp. 73-98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90869-4_7
  32. Hon, W. K., Hörnle, J., & Millard, C. (2014). Data protection jurisdiction and cloud computing – when are cloud users and providers subject to EU data protection law? The cloud of unknowing, Part 3. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 26(2-3), 129-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2013.801578
  33. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
  34. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., Bonawitz, K., Charles, Z., Cormode, G., Cummings, R., D'Oliveira, R. G. L., Eichner, H., Rouayheb, S. E., Evans, D., Gardner, J., Garrett, Z., Gascón, A., Ghazi, B., Gibbons, P. B., ... Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1-2), 1-210. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000083
  35. Kaminski, M. E. (2019). The right to explanation, explained. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 34(1), 189-218. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38TD9N83K
  36. Kroll, J. A., Huey, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R., Robinson, D. G., & Yu, H. (2017). Accountable algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(3), 633-705. https://doi.org/10.2307/26166781
  37. Kumar, S., Tiwari, P., & Zymbler, M. (2020). Internet of Things is a revolutionary approach for future technology enhancement: A review. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0268-2
  38. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765-4774. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874
  39. Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019). Model cards for model reporting. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 220-229. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287596
  40. Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501-507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4
  41. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
  42. Price, W. N., & Cohen, I. G. (2019). Privacy in the age of medical big data. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0272-7
  43. Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372873
  44. Rakova, B., Yang, J., Cramer, H., & Chowdhury, R. (2021). Where responsible AI meets reality: Practitioner perspectives on enablers for shifting organizational practices. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 7:1-7:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449081
  45. Reddy, S., Allan, S., Coghlan, S., & Cooper, P. (2020). A governance model for the application of AI in health care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(3), 491-497. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz192
  46. Reisman, D., Schultz, J., Crawford, K., & Whittaker, M. (2018). Algorithmic impact assessments: A practical framework for public agency accountability. AI Now Institute. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3867634
  47. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why should I trust you?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135-1144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778
  48. Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., Wang, V., & Floridi, L. (2021). The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: An analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation. AI & Society, 36(1), 59-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00992-2
  49. Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x
  50. Schuett, J. (2019). A legal definition of AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01095. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.01095
  51. Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., Davydov, E., Phillips, T., Ebner, D., Chaudhary, V., Young, M., Crespo, J. F., & Dennison, D. (2015). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 28, 2503-2511. https://doi.org/10.5555/2969442.2969519
  52. Selbst, A. D., & Barocas, S. (2018). The intuitive appeal of explainable machines. Fordham Law Review, 87(3), 1085-1139. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3126971
  53. Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287598
  54. Smuha, N. A. (2021). From a 'race to AI' to a 'race to AI regulation': Regulatory competition for artificial intelligence. Law, Innovation and Technology, 13(1), 57-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1898300
  55. Talby, D. (2020). Data quality for machine learning: A practical approach to automating data quality validation. O'Reilly Media. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3406477
  56. Veale, M., & Binns, R. (2017). Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717743530
  57. Veale, M., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2021). Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act. Computer Law Review International, 22(4), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.9785/cri-2021-220402
  58. Veale, M., Van Kleek, M., & Binns, R. (2018). Fairness and accountability design needs for algorithmic support in high-stakes public sector decision-making. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 440:1-440:14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174014
  59. Voigt, P., & Von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A practical guide. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57959-7
  60. Wachter, S., & Mittelstadt, B. (2019). A right to reasonable inferences: Re-thinking data protection law in the age of big data and AI. Columbia Business Law Review, 2019(2), 494-620. https://doi.org/10.7916/cblr.v2019i2.3424
  61. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the general data protection regulation. International Data Privacy Law, 7(2), 76-99. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipx005
  62. Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
  63. Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), 12:1-12:19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3298981
  64. Yeung, K., Howes, A., & Pogrebna, G. (2020). AI governance by human rights-centred design, deliberation and oversight: An end to ethics washing. In M. Dubber, F. Pasquale, & S. Das (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ethics of AI (pp. 77-105). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.4.
  65. Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Barberis, J. N. (2017). Regulating a revolution: From regulatory sandboxes to smart regulation. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 23(1), 31-103. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3018534
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence IT Infrastructure Compliance Challenges Governance Framework Data Privacy Regulatory Requirements Risk Mitigation Algorithmic Accountability GDPR HIPAA

Powered by PhDFocusTM