CFP last date
20 April 2026
Call for Paper
May Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming May edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 April 2026

Submit your paper
Know more
Random Articles
Reseach Article

From Vision to Victory: Best Practices for Architecting Enterprise-Wide Compliance Ecosystems

by Saikrishna Tarakampet, Raghunath Koilakonda, Subhash Tatavarthi
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 187 - Number 87
Year of Publication: 2026
Authors: Saikrishna Tarakampet, Raghunath Koilakonda, Subhash Tatavarthi
10.5120/ijca2026926508

Saikrishna Tarakampet, Raghunath Koilakonda, Subhash Tatavarthi . From Vision to Victory: Best Practices for Architecting Enterprise-Wide Compliance Ecosystems. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 87 ( Mar 2026), 31-37. DOI=10.5120/ijca2026926508

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2026926508,
author = { Saikrishna Tarakampet, Raghunath Koilakonda, Subhash Tatavarthi },
title = { From Vision to Victory: Best Practices for Architecting Enterprise-Wide Compliance Ecosystems },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Mar 2026 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 87 },
month = { Mar },
year = { 2026 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 31-37 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number87/from-vision-to-victory-best-practices-for-architecting-enterprise-wide-compliance-ecosystems/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2026926508 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2026-03-20T22:55:13.093623+05:30
%A Saikrishna Tarakampet
%A Raghunath Koilakonda
%A Subhash Tatavarthi
%T From Vision to Victory: Best Practices for Architecting Enterprise-Wide Compliance Ecosystems
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 187
%N 87
%P 31-37
%D 2026
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Enterprise-wide compliance ecosystems have become critical infrastructure for organizations operating in complex regulatory environments [1]. As regulatory scope expands across jurisdictions and industries, traditional compliance approaches—characterized by siloed tools, static workflows, and fragmented ownership—have proven insufficient [3]. This paper presents a comprehensive architectural framework for designing scalable, enterprise-wide compliance ecosystems using ServiceNow's IT Service Management (ITSM) and Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) suites [10], with the Common Service Data Model (CSDM) [5] serving as the foundational data backbone. The proposed framework introduces a Stakeholder-Aligned Compliance Ecosystem Framework (SACEF) [7] that integrates modular workflows, standardized service modeling, and embedded governance mechanisms to achieve regulatory agility at scale. A global enterprise case study demonstrates a 35% improvement in compliance audit efficiency, a 83% reduction in duplicate controls, and a 114% increase in stakeholder satisfaction. Central to this success is a stakeholder-aligned design methodology that ensures continuous alignment between architecture, process, and people [8]. This research provides a practical blueprint for future compliance platforms and highlights the leadership role of Saikrishna Tarakampet in advancing CSDM-driven ITSM and compliance ecosystem implementations [7].

References
  1. Gartner, “Magic Quadrant for Integrated Risk Management Platforms,” Gartner Research, 2024.
  2. Ponemon Institute, “Cost of Compliance Report 2023,” Ponemon Institute LLC, 2023.
  3. NAVEX, “State of Compliance Report,” NAVEX Global, 2024.
  4. Deloitte, “Global Compliance Survey,” Deloitte Insights, 2024.
  5. ServiceNow, “Common Service Data Model (CSDM) 4.0,” ServiceNow Documentation, 2025.
  6. ISACA, “State of Cybersecurity 2023,” ISACA Research, 2023.
  7. S. K. Tarakampet, “CSDM-Driven Compliance Ecosystems,” in ServiceNow Knowledge Conference, 2024.
  8. M. Rasmussen, “RACI-VS: Enhanced Accountability Framework,” Corporate Compliance Insights, 2007.
  9. Forrester, “The Role of CSDM in Digital Transformation,” Forrester Research, 2024.
  10. AXELOS, ITIL 4 Foundation, The Stationery Office (TSO), 2019.
  11. Open Policy Agent, “Policy as Code,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.openpolicyagent.org
  12. ENISA, “Compliance in Hybrid Environments,” European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, 2024.
  13. D. C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 9th ed., Wiley, 2017.
  14. G. Casella and R. Berger, Statistical Inference, 2nd ed., Duxbury Press, 2002.
  15. J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Routledge, 1988.
  16. ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information Security Management Systems — Requirements, International Organization for Standardization, 2022.
  17. NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2020.
  18. ISO 37301:2021, Compliance Management Systems — Requirements with Guidance for Use, International Organization for Standardization, 2021.
  19. E. R. Tufte, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 2nd ed., Graphics Press, 2001.
  20. Gartner, “Integrated Risk Management Platforms Market Guide,” Gartner Research, 2024.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Enterprise Compliance Ecosystems Stakeholder Alignment ServiceNow ITSM Governance Risk and Compliance (GRC) Common Service Data Model (CSDM) Compliance Architecture Regulatory Agility Modular Workflows Policy as Code Audit Automation Enterprise Governance Operational Resilience Stakeholder Accountability (RACI-VS) Compliance Scalability Digital Transformation