The week's pick
Random Articles
Reseach Article
Performance Analysis of De-registration Strategies in Personal Communication Network
| International Journal of Computer Applications |
| Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA |
| Volume 24 - Number 1 |
| Year of Publication: 2011 |
| Authors: Rajeev R. Kumar Tripathi, Sudhir Agrawal, Swati Tiwari |
10.5120/2915-3839
|
Rajeev R. Kumar Tripathi, Sudhir Agrawal, Swati Tiwari . Performance Analysis of De-registration Strategies in Personal Communication Network. International Journal of Computer Applications. 24, 1 ( June 2011), 21-25. DOI=10.5120/2915-3839
Abstract
When a mobile terminal (MT) leaves its registration area (RA) and enters into new RA, the serving Visitor Location Register (VLR) sends a registration request to the Home Location Register (HLR).On receiving this request the HLR sends a de-registration request to the old VLR (which was serving the MT).After deregistering the MT, the old VLR acknowledges the request of HLR and then the HLR confirms the registration of the MT by sending the acknowledgement message to the new VLR. This approach is called explicit de-registration scheme. Implicit de-registration is a variant scheme, in which we can save the cost by ignoring the explicit de-registration message to the old VLR and its acknowledgement to the HLR. In terms of cost, implicit de-registration strategy is efficient than the explicit as we are saving de-registration signal exchange cost. However, at old VLR we may have the invalid entries. These invalid entries increase the database size at the VLR. To remove the invalid entries from the VLR, various de-registration schemes were suggested like polling, timeout and the group de-registration scheme. In this paper a comparative analysis is performed. On the basis of the cost incurred and the numerical result shows that the group de-registration scheme is efficient than the timeout and polling scheme.
References
- I.F. Akyildiz and J.S.M. Ho, “On location management for personal communications networks”,IEEE Communk. Mag., pp.138-145, Sept.1996.
- Zuji Mao and Chritos Douligeris, “Group De-registration Strategy for PCS Zuji Mao and Chritos Douligeris, “Group De-registration Strategy for PCS Networks,” IEEE communications letters, vol.6, no.4, April, 2002.
- Vijay Kumar, Mobile Databases, JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., PUBLICATION.
- Y.-B. Lin, “De-registration strategies for PCS networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol.47, pp.49-57, Feb.1998.
- A.R. Noerpel, L.F. Chang, and Y.-B Lin, “Polling de-registration for unlicensed PCS,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol.14, pp.728-734, May 1996.
- Rajeev R. Kumar Tripathi, Sudhir Agrawal, Swati Tiwari, “Modified HLR-VLR Location Management Scheme in PCS Network,” IJCA (0975-8887), vol.6, no.5, Sept. 2010.
- Y-B. Lin and A. Neorpel, “Implicit de-registration in PCS network,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol.43, no. 4. Pp. 1006-1010, 1994.
- EIA/TIA, “Cellular radio-telecommunications intersystem operations: Automatic roaming,”Tech. report IS-41.3-B, EIA/TIA, 1991.
- M. Mouly and M-B. Pautet, “The GSM System for Mobile Communications,” Palaiseau, France, 1992.
- Ai-Chung Pang, Y-B Lin, Yuguang Fang, “Implicit Deregistration with Forced Registration for PCS Mobility Management,” Wireless Networks 7, 99-104, 2001.
- Z. mao, C. Douligeris, “A novel deregistration strategy for mobile networks”, IEEE VTS 2750-2754, vol. 6, Aug 2002.
- A.R. Noerpel, Y.B. Lin and H. Sherry, “PACS: Personal Access Communication System- A Tutorial”, IEEE Personal Communications, vol.3, no.3, pp.32-43, June 1997.
Index Terms
Keywords