CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Real-time Traffic Performance for WiFi Handovers over MIPv4 versus MIPv6

by Ahmad H. Talaat, Nael A. Hussein, Hussein A. Elsayed, Hadia Elhennawy
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 26 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: Ahmad H. Talaat, Nael A. Hussein, Hussein A. Elsayed, Hadia Elhennawy
10.5120/3127-4303

Ahmad H. Talaat, Nael A. Hussein, Hussein A. Elsayed, Hadia Elhennawy . Real-time Traffic Performance for WiFi Handovers over MIPv4 versus MIPv6. International Journal of Computer Applications. 26, 8 ( July 2011), 10-15. DOI=10.5120/3127-4303

@article{ 10.5120/3127-4303,
author = { Ahmad H. Talaat, Nael A. Hussein, Hussein A. Elsayed, Hadia Elhennawy },
title = { Real-time Traffic Performance for WiFi Handovers over MIPv4 versus MIPv6 },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { July 2011 },
volume = { 26 },
number = { 8 },
month = { July },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 10-15 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume26/number8/3127-4303/ },
doi = { 10.5120/3127-4303 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:12:14.863282+05:30
%A Ahmad H. Talaat
%A Nael A. Hussein
%A Hussein A. Elsayed
%A Hadia Elhennawy
%T Real-time Traffic Performance for WiFi Handovers over MIPv4 versus MIPv6
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 26
%N 8
%P 10-15
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

One of the major problems faced by different wireless networks nowadays, is the mobility. Inter-Radio Access Technologies handovers, roaming, and application continuity problems motivate the MIPv6 rather than MIPv4. This paper will cover the main benefits and drawbacks for the different mobile IPs via literal and simulation discussions. Using IPv4 tunnels to carry MIPv6 as a alternate will be discussed also, in case of not all-IPv6 network is used.

References
  1. L. Bokor, Z. Kanizsai, G. Jeney, “Performance Evaluation of Key IMS Operations over IPv6-capable 3G UMTS Networks”, 2010 Ninth International Conference on Networks
  2. Mobile IPv6 -- A short introduction by Holger Zuleger (http://www.hznet.de/ipv6/mipv6-intro.pdf)
  3. IPv6 Coexistence and Integration, Salman Asadullah, Technical Advisor, IPv6 Forum, Cisco Systems
  4. Perkins, C., Ed., "IP Mobility Support for IPv4", RFC 3344, August 2002.
  5. Perkins, C., "IP Encapsulation within IP", RFC 2003, October 1996.
  6. Perkins, C., "Minimal Encapsulation within IP", RFC 2004, 1996.
  7. Narten, T., Nordmark, E. and W. Simpson, "Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 2461, December 1998.
  8. Ferguson, P. and D. Senie, "Network Ingress Filtering: Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source Address Spoofing", BCP 38, RFC 2827, May 2000.
  9. RFC 3775: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3775.txt
  10. Carpenter, B. and K. Moore, “Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds”. RFC 3056, February 2001. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3056
  11. Gilligan, R. and E. Nordmark, “Transition Mechanisms for IPv6 Hosts and Routers”. RFC 2893, August 2000.http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2893
  12. http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac123/ac147/images/ipj/ipj_9-3/93_ipv6_fig1_lg.jpg captured from http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_9-3/ipv6_internals.htm
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MIPv4 MIPv6 IPv4 Tunnel Wifi Handover PRoute Optimization