The week's pick
Random Articles
Reseach Article
Comparison of Call Signalling Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks
| International Journal of Computer Applications |
| Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA |
| Volume 27 - Number 10 |
| Year of Publication: 2011 |
| Authors: Sarika Malhotra, Prabhjot Kaur |
10.5120/3335-4588
|
Sarika Malhotra, Prabhjot Kaur . Comparison of Call Signalling Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 27, 10 ( August 2011), 35-40. DOI=10.5120/3335-4588
Abstract
The two major standards in the multimedia services over IP area are the protocol suites H.323 (ITU-T) and SIP (IETF).Both have emerged as competing protocol standards for the signaling and call control of IP telephony. SIP is designed with a broader scope, offering functions specifically designed to enable easy extensions; it should be the advantage for new potential services. H.323 is still the more mature standard; H.323 provides better interoperability and interworking (PSTN, ISDN). We can assume a coexistence of both protocols. We compare voice performance parameters like talking time, total sessions, delay, jitter packet delivery ratio, call set up times and throughput, establish the differences in performance of these two VoIP protocols through an Qualnet simulation. SIP and H.323 are used for establishment and release of Voice over IP calls as well as Video and Media calls. Both these protocols play a very important role in terms of optimizing the call set up time and call reliability and flexibility over IP networks for real time applications like voice and video. The obtained results are discussed to highlight the impact of both H.323 and SIP in ad-hoc networks.
References
- “ITU-T Recommendation H.323 (06/2006)", Packet-based multimedia communications systems, June 2006, http;//www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=TRE-H.323-200606-I!!!PDF-E&type=items
- A Generic technique for VOIP traffic detection by Fauzia idrees, uzma salaam khan, military college of signals, NUST, Rawalpindi Pakistan.
- M. Handley, H. Schulzrinne, E. Schooler, J. Rosenberg, “SIP: Session Initiation Protocol”, Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, September 1998, work in progress.
- A Comparison of H.323 Vs SIP by Pavlos Papageorgiou, University of Maryland at College Park, June 4, 2001
- G.A Thom, H.323: the multimedia communication standard for LANS, IEEE Communication (1996) December
- N. Networks, “A Comparison of H.323v4 and SIP,” 3GPP S2, Tokyo, Japan, Technical Report S2-000505, Jan. 5 2000.
- “Voice over Internet Protocol. Definition and Overview" International Engineering Consortium. 2007. Retrieved 2009-04-27.
- M. Handley and V. Jacobson, “SDP: session description protocol,” Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 2327, Internet Engineering Task Force, Apr. 1998.
- A. B. Johnston, SIP: Understanding the Session Initiation Protocol. Artech House, 2001.
- Davidson, Jonathan; James Peters, Jim Peters, Brian Gracely. "H.323" Voice over IP fundamentals. Cisco Press ,pp. 229–230.
- Performance analysis of secure session initiation protocol based VoIP networks by Mohan Krishna Ranganathan*, Liam Kilmartin, Communication and Signal Processing Research Unit, Department of Electronic Engineering, National University of Ireland, Ireland , 25 June 2002
- M. Handley, V. Jacobson, SDP: session description protocol, IETF RFC 2327 (1998).
- J. Rosenberg, H. Schulzrinne, G. Camarillo, A. Johnston, J. Peterson. Sparks, M. Handley, E. Schooler, “SIP: Session Initiation Protocol”, RFC3261, June 2002.
Index Terms
Keywords