CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Comparative Study of On-demand Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Network

by Ramprasad Kumawat, Vinay Somani
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 27 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: Ramprasad Kumawat, Vinay Somani
10.5120/3339-4597

Ramprasad Kumawat, Vinay Somani . Comparative Study of On-demand Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Network. International Journal of Computer Applications. 27, 10 ( August 2011), 6-11. DOI=10.5120/3339-4597

@article{ 10.5120/3339-4597,
author = { Ramprasad Kumawat, Vinay Somani },
title = { Comparative Study of On-demand Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Network },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2011 },
volume = { 27 },
number = { 10 },
month = { August },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 6-11 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume27/number10/3339-4597/ },
doi = { 10.5120/3339-4597 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:13:23.537876+05:30
%A Ramprasad Kumawat
%A Vinay Somani
%T Comparative Study of On-demand Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Network
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 27
%N 10
%P 6-11
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

A Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is a dynamic wireless network that can be formed without the need for any pre-existing infrastructure in which each node can act as a router. One of the main challenges of MANET is the design of robust routing algorithms that adapt to the frequent and randomly changing network topology. A variety of routing protocols have been proposed and several of them have been extensively simulated or implemented as well. In this paper, we compare and evaluate the performance metrics of three types of On- demand routing protocols- Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing protocol, which is unipath, Ad-hoc On-demand Multipath Distance Vector (AOMDV) routing protocol and Dynamic Source routing (DSR) protocol. This paper investigates all these routing protocols corresponding to packet delivery fraction (pdf), throughput, normalized routing load and end to end delay. The ns-2 simulation results showed that AODV has always low routing load compared to AOMDV in both static and dynamic network for each set of connections. AOMDV provided better results at high pause time but worst in case of end to end delay. We have also seen that, DSR performed well in terms of end to end delay in both static and dynamic networks.

References
  1. D. Johnson, Dynamic Source Routing for Mobil Ad Hoc Networks, IEFT MANET Draft, April 2003.
  2. C.S.R. Murthy and B.S. Manoj, Ad Hoc Wireless Networks: Architecture and Protocols, ch. Routing Protocols for Ad hoc Wireless Network, pp. 299.
  3. Altman E and Jimenez T., (2003). NS Simulator for Beginners. Lecture notes. Univ.de Los Andes, Merida, Venezuela and ESSI. Sophia-Antipolis, France.
  4. D. Johnson, D. Maltz, and J. Broch. DSR: The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Multihop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In Ad Hoc Networking, C. Perkins (ed), Chapter 5, pages 139–172, 2001.
  5. C.E. Perkins, E.M. Royer & S. Das, Ad Hoc on Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, IETF Internet draft, draft-ietf-manet-aodv-08.txt, March 2001.
  6. D. Kim, J. Garcia and K. Obraczka, “Routing Mechanisms for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks based on the Energy Drain Rate”, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing. Vol 2, no 2, 2003, pp.161-173.
  7. David B. Johnson and David A. Maltz. “Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks”, Mobile Computing, Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1996 pp.153–181, 1996.
  8. M.Caleffi, G.Ferraiuolo and L.Pauro, “On Reliability of Dynamic Addressing Protocols in Mobile Ad hoc Networks”, Proceedings of WRECOM’07, Wireless Rural and Emergency Communications Conference, Roma, Italy, October 2007.
  9. The Network Simulator NS-2 homepage, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
  10. Mahesh K. Marina and Samir R.Das, “On-Demand Multipath Distance Vector Routing in Ad-hoc Networks”, In proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, 2001 pp 14-23.
  11. Performance Evaluation of AODV, DSDV & DSR Routing Protocol in Grid Environment, by Nor Surayati Mohamad Usop, Azizol Abdullah, IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 9, No.7, July 2009.
  12. H. S. Bindra, S. K. Maakar and A. L. Sangal, “Performance Evaluation of Two Reactive Routing Protocols of MANET using Group Mobility Model”, IJCSI (Internal journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, No 10, May 2010.
  13. N. Adam, M. Y. Ismail, J. Abdullah, “Effect of Node Density of Performances of Three MANET Routing Protocols”, Department of Science Physics, Department of Communication Eng., Faculty of Science and Technology, Fac. of Electrical and Electronic Eng., University of Malaysia Terengganu, University of Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia 2010, P 321-325.
  14. V.C. Patil, R.V. Biradar, R.R. Mudholkar and S.R. Sawant, On-demand multipath routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks issues and comparison, International Journal of Wireless Communication and Simulation 2 (1) (2010), pp. 21–38.
  15. N. Jaisankar and R. Saravanan, An extended AODV protocol for multipath routing in MANETs, International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2 (4) (2010).
  16. S.S. Tyagi and R.K. Chauhan, Performance analysis of proactive and reactive routing protocols for ad hoc networks, International Journal of Computer Applications 1 (14) (2010).
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Ad hoc aodv aomdv dsr manet ns-2 route cache latency