CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Post Scan Correction of Step, Linear and Spiral Motion Effects in CT Scans

by Saima Zafar
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 35 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: Saima Zafar
10.5120/4436-6182

Saima Zafar . Post Scan Correction of Step, Linear and Spiral Motion Effects in CT Scans. International Journal of Computer Applications. 35, 10 ( December 2011), 13-19. DOI=10.5120/4436-6182

@article{ 10.5120/4436-6182,
author = { Saima Zafar },
title = { Post Scan Correction of Step, Linear and Spiral Motion Effects in CT Scans },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { December 2011 },
volume = { 35 },
number = { 10 },
month = { December },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 13-19 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume35/number10/4436-6182/ },
doi = { 10.5120/4436-6182 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:21:36.841249+05:30
%A Saima Zafar
%T Post Scan Correction of Step, Linear and Spiral Motion Effects in CT Scans
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 35
%N 10
%P 13-19
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

X-ray CT scanners provide images of transverse cross sections of the human body from a large number of projections. During the acquisition of image data, the motion of patient produce effects that appear as blurring, doubling, and distortion in the reconstructed images. This degrades the image quality and can lead to wrong diagnosis. In this work a technique has been developed and tested that removes these effects in brain CT scanning for step, linear and rotational motions of head during CT scanning process. The motion of head is modeled as rigid body motion. The three-dimensional motion information is used to correct the CT data before reconstructing the image from it. The images are found to be free of motion effects. The results demonstrate the validity of this approach for above stated types of head motion of patients during CT data acquisition process.

References
  1. Zafar, S. Younis, W. Sheikh, N.M. 2006. The compensation of head motion effects using an infrared tracking system for CT (computedtomogrpahy) imaging. Visual Information Engineering, 2006. VIE 2006. IET International Conference on. 105-109.
  2. Christian, D., Younis, W., Winter, J., Georgios, S., Firle, E., Stergiopoulos, S. 2004. The Compensation of Head Motion Effects Using an Infrared Tracking System and a New Mechanism for fMRI. MMVR12 Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12. 75-81.
  3. Lu, W., and R Mackie, T. R. 2002. Tomographic motion detection and correction directly in sinogram space. Phys. Med. Bios. 47. 1267-1284.
  4. Zerfowski, D. 1998. Motion Effect Compensation in CT. Universität Karlsruhe; Institut für Mechanismen und Kognitive Systeme. 301.
  5. Dhanantwari, A., Stergiopoulos, S. et. al. 2001. Correcting Organ Motion Effects in x-ray CT Medical Imaging Systems by Adaptive Processing (Part I: Theory). Med. Phys. J., 28(8), 1562-1576.
  6. Dold, C., Younis, W., Winter, J., Sakas, G., Irle, E., Stergiopoulos, S. 2004. The Compensation of Head Motion Effects Using an Infrared Tracking System and a New Mechanism for fMRI. MMVR12 Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12. 75-81.
  7. Dhanantwari, A., Stergiopoulos, S., et. al.. 2001. Correcting Organ Motion Effects in x-ray CT Systems based on Tracking of Motion Phase by the Spacial Overlap Correlator (Part II: Experimental Study). Med. Phys. J., 28(8). 1577-1596.
  8. Dusaussory, N. J., Cao, Q., Yancey, R. N., Stanley, J. H. 1995. Image Processing for CT-assisted reverse engineering and part characterization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP ‘95).
  9. 2002. Respiratory compensation in projection imaging using a magnification and displacement model. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 15(3). 327-332.
  10. Lewis, J. H., Ruijiang L., Xun J., Watkins, W. T., Yifei. L., Song, W., and Jiang, S., 2011. Mitigation of motion effects in CBCT of lung tumors based on tracked tumor motion during CBCT acquisition. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 56(17).
  11. Naranjo, V., LIorens, R., Alcaniz, M., Lopez-Mir, F. 2011. Metal effect reduction in dental CT images using polar mathematical morphology. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 102(1).
  12. Ketcham, R.A. and Carlson. 2001. Acquisition, optimization and interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery: Applications to the geosciences. Computers and Geosciences, W.D.
  13. Anas, E., Lee, S., Hasan, M.. 2011. Classification of ring effects for their effective removal using type adaptive correction schemes. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 41(6). 390-401.
  14. Kak, A. C. and Slaney M. 1999. Principles of ComputedTomographic Imaging. New York, IEEE Press.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Computed Tomography Scans Phantom Objects