CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Heuristic Evaluation of Online Documentation using Qualitative Indicators

by Shrikant Vitthal Salve, Ganesh D. Bhutkar
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 36 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: Shrikant Vitthal Salve, Ganesh D. Bhutkar
10.5120/4524-6146

Shrikant Vitthal Salve, Ganesh D. Bhutkar . Heuristic Evaluation of Online Documentation using Qualitative Indicators. International Journal of Computer Applications. 36, 10 ( December 2011), 1-10. DOI=10.5120/4524-6146

@article{ 10.5120/4524-6146,
author = { Shrikant Vitthal Salve, Ganesh D. Bhutkar },
title = { Heuristic Evaluation of Online Documentation using Qualitative Indicators },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { December 2011 },
volume = { 36 },
number = { 10 },
month = { December },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-10 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume36/number10/4524-6146/ },
doi = { 10.5120/4524-6146 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:22:47.657052+05:30
%A Shrikant Vitthal Salve
%A Ganesh D. Bhutkar
%T Heuristic Evaluation of Online Documentation using Qualitative Indicators
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 36
%N 10
%P 1-10
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper presents a heuristic evaluation method for online documentation to identify specific usability problems, which are observed with such documentation. We have used qualitative indicators for all heuristics, which are summed up to provide a usability index (with base 100). This index quantifies the goodness of online documentation under consideration. We have considered both types of online documents - online tutorial and online help. A tremendous increase in volume and contents of online documentation make its usability extremely vital for helping users in efficient usage and learning. The heuristic evaluation has been performed by three different usability evaluators for two more online documents to ensure the reliability of heuristics proposed in this paper. The specialized set of heuristics and the objectively defined usability indicators are found more reliable in identifying related usability problems. The usability index calculated is useful for comparison of quality of online documents. A tool is implemented which calculates the usability index and provides the analytical graphical output to the users so that they will know the comparative details about usability of the online documents.

References
  1. Allen, M., Currie, L., Bakken, S., Patel, V., and Cimino, J. 2006. Heuristic Evaluation of Paper based Web Pages: A Simplified Inspection Usability Methodology. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 39, 412-423.
  2. Conte, T., Massollar, J., Mendes, E., and Travassos, G. 2007. Usability Evaluation Based on Web Design Perspective, Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. First International Symposium. 146-155.
  3. Dhannaseth, N., and Bhutkar, G. 2011. Study of Organizational Factors Affecting Usability of Online Helps with Programming Languages. Communication in Computer and Information Science, Springer. 204(1), 628-637.
  4. Ficarra, F. 1997. Evaluation of Multimedia Components. Multimedia Computing and System - IEEE International Conference, Ottawa, Ont., Canada. 557-564.
  5. Horton, W. 1994. Designing and Writing Online Documentation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Kantner, L., Shroyer, R., and Rosenbaum, S. 2002. Structured Heuristic Evaluation of Online Documentation. Professional Communication Conference – IPCC. 331-334.
  7. Katre, D., Bhutkar, G., and Karmarkar, S. 2010. Usability Heuristics and Qualitative Indicators for the Usability Evaluation of Touch Screen Ventilator Systems. Human Work Interaction Design, Usability in Social, Cultural and Organizational Contexts, IFIP AICT 316, Springer. 83-97.
  8. Kurosu, M., Matsuura, S., and Sugizaki, M. 1997. Categorical Inspection Method - Structured Heuristic Evaluation (sHEM). System, Man and Cybernetics - IEEE International Conference, Orlando, FL, USA. 2613-2618.
  9. Lopez, R., Chagpar, A., White, R., McLean, M., Trudel, M., Cafazzo, J., and Logan, A. 2007. Usability of a Diabetes Tele-management System. 30th Annual Canadian Medical and Biological Engineering Conference.
  10. Martha, M. 1988. Online Documentation and Hypermedia: Designing Learnability into the Product. International Conference on Professional Technical Communication - IPCC, Seattle, WA, USA. 301-305.
  11. Miller, G. 1956. The Magic Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review. 63, 81-87.
  12. Moallem, A. 2009. Usability of Software Online Documentation: A User Study. Retrieved on Sept. 5, 2009 from http://sjsulug.engr.sjsu.edu/amoallem/publications/834 _HCI_Usability_AMoallem.pdf.
  13. Momento24. 2009. Number of Websites for Every Human Being. Retrieved on February 12, 2010 from http://momento24.com/en/2009/07/31/number-of-websites-surpasses-world-population-by-far/
  14. Nielsen, J. 1992. Finding Usability Problems through Heuristic Evaluation. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, California, USA. 373-380.
  15. Nielsen, J. 1994. Usability Inspection Method. Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Massachusetts, USA. 413-414.
  16. Nurmuliani, N., Zowghi, D., and Williams, S. 2004. Using Card Sorting Technique to Classify Requirements Change. 12th IEEE International Requirement Engineering Conference, Kyoto, Japan. 240-248.
  17. Selber, S., Johnson-Eilola, J., and Mehlenbacher, B. 1997. Online documentation: Tutorials, Documentation, and Help. Chapter 94, CRC handbook of Computer Science and Engineering. 1619-1643.
  18. Shneiderman, B. 2002. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Third Edition, Pearson Education Asia.
  19. Unwalla, M. 2007. Advantages of Online Documentation. Retrieved on Feb. 4, 2010 from http://www.techscribe.co.uk/ techw/paper-v-online.htm#relative_merits.
  20. Zhang, J., Jhnson, T., Patel, V., Paige, D., and Kuboseb, T. 2003. Using Usability Heuristics to Evaluate Patient Safety of Medical Devices. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 36, 23-30.
  21. http://www.w3schools.com/ - Online tutorial retrieved on 10th May, 2010.
  22. http://office.microsoft.com/en-u/word/FX100649251033.spx/ - Online help retrieved on 10th May, 2010.
  23. http://www.hp.com/#Support/ - Online help retrieved on 25th May, 2010.
  24. http://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/index.jsp-/ Online tutorial retrieved on 25th May, 2010.
  25. http://pages.ebay.com/help/index.html - Online help retrieved on 25th May, 2010.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Usability Online documentation Heuristic evaluation Qualitative indicators Usability index Online help Online tutorial

Powered by PhDFocusTM