CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Evaluation of Textural Feature Extraction Methods for Prostate Cancer TRUS Medical images

by R. Manavalan, K. Thangavel
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 36 - Number 12
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors: R. Manavalan, K. Thangavel
10.5120/4554-6458

R. Manavalan, K. Thangavel . Evaluation of Textural Feature Extraction Methods for Prostate Cancer TRUS Medical images. International Journal of Computer Applications. 36, 12 ( December 2011), 33-39. DOI=10.5120/4554-6458

@article{ 10.5120/4554-6458,
author = { R. Manavalan, K. Thangavel },
title = { Evaluation of Textural Feature Extraction Methods for Prostate Cancer TRUS Medical images },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { December 2011 },
volume = { 36 },
number = { 12 },
month = { December },
year = { 2011 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 33-39 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume36/number12/4554-6458/ },
doi = { 10.5120/4554-6458 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:23:04.020993+05:30
%A R. Manavalan
%A K. Thangavel
%T Evaluation of Textural Feature Extraction Methods for Prostate Cancer TRUS Medical images
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 36
%N 12
%P 33-39
%D 2011
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Ultrasound imaging is one of the promising techniques used for early detection of prostate cancer. The image is segmented by different methods after preprocessing. In this paper, DBSCAN clustering with morphological operators is used to extort the prostate region. It is proposed to analyze the performance of the features extracted from the different Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) constructed for various distances with different combination of directions, since there is no research has been conducted so far. Then, Support Vector Machine (SVM) is used to classify the images into benign or malignant using the extracted features. The performance of the classification is evaluated using various statistical measures such as sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. The proposed method is tested over 5500 digitized TRUS images of prostate.

References
  1. Amadasun, M. and King, R., (1989) ‘Textural features corresponding to textural properties’, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1264 - 1274.
  2. Anil K. Jain. (1989) Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing: Prentice Hall.
  3. Babaghorbani, P.; Parvaneh, S.; Ghassemi, A.R.; Manshai, K: (2010) ‘Sonography Images for Breast Cancer Texture classification in Diagnosis of Malignant or Benign Tumors’, in 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE), pp.18 - 20.
  4. Chung-Ming W.; Yung-Chang C. and Hsieh, K; (1992) ‘Texture features for classification of ultrasonic liver images’. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, pp 141 –152.
  5. Devendran V et. al.,( 2008) ‘Texture based Scene Categorization using Artificial Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines: A Comparative Study,’ ICGST-GVIP, Vol. 8, Issue IV, pp. 45-52.
  6. Duda, R., Hart, P. And Stork, D. (2001), ‘Pattern Classification’: John Wiley and Sons.
  7. Ester, M., Kriegel, H.P., Sander, J., and Xu, X.(1996) ‘A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise’. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Portland: AAAI Press. pp. 226-231.
  8. Fatima Eddaoudi, and Fakhita Regragui,:(2011) ‘Masses Detection Using SVM Classifier Based on Textures Analysis’ Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 8, pp. 367 – 379.
  9. Gonzalez, R. and Woods, R. (2002). Digital Image Processing. 3rd Edn., Prentice Hall Publications, pp. 50-51.
  10. Haralick, R.M. , Shanmugan, K.. and Dinstein, I.( 1973) ‘Textural Features for Image Classification’, IEEE Tr. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol SMC-3, No. 6, pp. 610-621.
  11. Haralick, R.M. (1979) ‘Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture’, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 67, No. 5, pp. 786-804.
  12. Massimiliano Pavan and Marcello Pelillo: (2007) ‘Dominant Sets and Pairwise Clustering’, IEEE Transactions On Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 167 – 172.
  13. Metehan Makinaci:( 2005) ‘ Support Vector Machine Approach for Classification of Cancerous Prostate Regions’, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. pp. 166 – 169.
  14. Mohamed, S.S. and Salama M.M. ( 2005 ) ‘Computer Aided diagnosis for Prostate cancer using Support Vector Machine’ Publication: Proc., medical imaging conference, California, SPIE Vol. 5744, pp. 899-907.
  15. Thangavel, K., Manavalan, R. and Laurence Aroquiaraj . I. (2009), Removal of Speckle Noise from Ultrasound Medical Image based on Special Filters: Comparative Study, ICGST-GVIP Journal, ISSN 1687-398X, Volume (9), Issue (III), pp. 25-32.
  16. Scardino, PT.,( 1989 ) ‘Early detection of prostate cancer’. ; Urol Clin North Am., Vol. No 16(4) , pp: 635-55.
  17. Sinan Kockara, Mutlu Mete, Bernard Chen, and Kemal Aydin:(2010). ‘Analysis of density based and fuzzy c-means clustering methods on lesion border extraction in dermoscopy images’, From Seventh Annual MCBIOS Conference: Bioinformatics Systems, Biology, Informatics and Computation Jonesboro, AR, USA. pp. 19 - 20.
  18. Sinha, G.R., Kavita Thakur and Kowar, M.K. (2008). “Speckle reduction in Ultrasound Image processing”, Journal of Acoustical. Society of India, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 36-39.
  19. Yanong Zhu, Stuart Williams, and Reyer Zwiggelaar (2006), ‘Computer Technology in Detection and Staging of Prostate Carcinoma: A review, Medical image Analysis’ Vol. No.10, pp 178-199.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Support Vector Machine SVM Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix DBSCAN M3-Filter