CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Artificial Neural Networks Model for Predicting Ultimate Analysis using Proximate Analysis of Coal

by J. Krishnaiah, A. Lawrence, R. Dhanuskodi
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 44 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: J. Krishnaiah, A. Lawrence, R. Dhanuskodi
10.5120/6234-7829

J. Krishnaiah, A. Lawrence, R. Dhanuskodi . Artificial Neural Networks Model for Predicting Ultimate Analysis using Proximate Analysis of Coal. International Journal of Computer Applications. 44, 2 ( April 2012), 9-13. DOI=10.5120/6234-7829

@article{ 10.5120/6234-7829,
author = { J. Krishnaiah, A. Lawrence, R. Dhanuskodi },
title = { Artificial Neural Networks Model for Predicting Ultimate Analysis using Proximate Analysis of Coal },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { April 2012 },
volume = { 44 },
number = { 2 },
month = { April },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 9-13 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume44/number2/6234-7829/ },
doi = { 10.5120/6234-7829 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:34:29.951935+05:30
%A J. Krishnaiah
%A A. Lawrence
%A R. Dhanuskodi
%T Artificial Neural Networks Model for Predicting Ultimate Analysis using Proximate Analysis of Coal
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 44
%N 2
%P 9-13
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In the fossil fuel (coal) based power plants, for estimating the combustion air requirement and for ensuring effective combustion of coal, it is very essential to know the elemental composition of the coal that is fired. Ultimate analysis is the process to be performed to know elemental composition of the coal collected. The ultimate analysis is costly, time-taking and also cumbersome in nature and therefore at the power-plants only gross-level coal compositions are estimated which is called proximate analysis. Based on the gross-level compositions of the coal, the elemental compositions are estimated using standard empirical formulae. The relationship between the gross level composition (i. e. proximate analysis) and the elemental level composition (i. e. ultimate analysis) is nonlinear, whereas the empirical formulae are linear assumptions which may lead to erroneous estimations. The empirical formulae based erroneous estimations lead to variation in the combustion behavior and thereby leading to suboptimal performance of the boilers. To achieve better control on the boilers and thereby to achieve better performance, accurate computation of elemental composition is required. In this article, we suggest a method to compute ultimate analysis based on the proximate analysis information using Artificial Neural Network model (ANN). The predictions of ANN and empirical models have been compared. It is found that the ANN prediction is in very good agreement with lab data than the predictions of empirical model.

References
  1. ASTM, Standard Practice for Proximate Analysis of Coal and Coke, (2007), D 3172 – 07a.
  2. M. C. Mayoral, M. T. Izquierdo, J. M. Andrés, B. Rubio, Different approaches to proximate analysis by thermogravimetry analysis, Thermochimica Acta, Volume 370, Issues 1–2, 4 April 2001, Pages 91–97
  3. N. S. Reddy, J. Krishnaiah, Seong-Gu Hong, Jae Sang Lee, Modeling medium carbon steels by using artificial neural networks, Materials Science and Engineering A, Volume 508, Issues 1-2, 20 May 2009, Pages 93-105. (Online copy: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. msea. 2008. 12. 022)
  4. D. Benny Karunakar, J. Krishnaiah, S. Patra and G. L. Datta, Effects of Grain Refinement and Alloying Elements on Hot Tearing in Aluminum Casting, International Journal of Production and Quality Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, Jan-June 2010, Pages: 13-20
  5. Shagufta U. Patel, B. Jeevan Kumar, Yogesh P. Badhe, B. K. Sharma, Sujan Saha, Subhasish Biswas, Asim Chaudhury, Sanjeev S. Tambe, Bhaskar D. Kulkarni, Estimation of gross calorific value of coals using artificial neural networks, Fuel, Volume 86, Issue 3, February 2007, Pages 334-344, ISSN 0016-2361, 10. 1016/j. fuel. 2006. 07. 036. (http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0016236106002961)
  6. T Cordero, F Marquez, J Rodriguez-Mirasol, J. J Rodriguez, Predicting heating values of lignocellulosics and carbonaceous materials from proximate analysis, Fuel, Volume 80, Issue 11, September 2001, Pages 1567–1571, DOI: 10. 1016/S0016-2361(01)00034-5
  7. Jigisha Parikh, S. A. Channiwala, G. K. Ghosal, A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid fuels, Fuel, Volume 84, Issue 5, March 2005, Pages:487–494, DOI: 10. 1016/j. fuel. 2004. 10. 010 (http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0016236104003072)
  8. H. M. Yao, H. B. Vuthaluru, M. O. Tadé, D. Djukanovic, Artificial neural network-based prediction of hydrogen content of coal in power station boilers, Fuel 84 (2005) 1535–1542
  9. Ali Volkan Akkaya, Proximate analysis based multiple regression models for higher heating value estimation of low rank coals, Fuel Processing Technology, (2009), 165 – 170
  10. S. Chehreh Chelgani, James C. Hower, E. Jorjani,, Sh. Mesroghli, A. H. Bagherieh, Prediction of coal grindability based on petrography, proximate and ultimate analysis using multiple regression and artificial neural network models, FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY 89 (2008) 13 – 20
  11. A. K. Verma, T. N. Singh and M. Monjezi, Intelligent prediction of heating value of coal, Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences 2 (2010), 101-109
  12. Simon Haykin, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation (3rd Edition), Prentice-Hall, 2007, ISBN:0131471392
  13. Bureau of Energy Efficiency, Fuels and Combustion-Chapter: http://www. em-ea. org/Guide%20Books/book-2/2. 1%20Fuels%20and%20combustion. pdf
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Artificial Neural Networks Proximate Analysis Ultimate Analysis Of Coal Combustion