CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Design of Software Process Improvement Model

by Ankit Aggarwal, Alankrita Aggarwal
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 49 - Number 13
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Ankit Aggarwal, Alankrita Aggarwal
10.5120/7688-1003

Ankit Aggarwal, Alankrita Aggarwal . Design of Software Process Improvement Model. International Journal of Computer Applications. 49, 13 ( July 2012), 30-34. DOI=10.5120/7688-1003

@article{ 10.5120/7688-1003,
author = { Ankit Aggarwal, Alankrita Aggarwal },
title = { Design of Software Process Improvement Model },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { July 2012 },
volume = { 49 },
number = { 13 },
month = { July },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 30-34 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume49/number13/7688-1003/ },
doi = { 10.5120/7688-1003 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:46:11.673013+05:30
%A Ankit Aggarwal
%A Alankrita Aggarwal
%T Design of Software Process Improvement Model
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 49
%N 13
%P 30-34
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Software process improvement (SPI) approaches have been designed to produce changes at many levels, i. e. in the strategies, culture and working practices, of software development. Studies have shown that nearly two thirds of all SPI efforts have failed or fallen short of expectations. SPI Software process improvement (SPI) today is based mainly on a perception of software processes as artifacts and this perception has led SPI efforts to focus on perfecting such artifacts as a means to improve the practices of the people supposed to execute these software processes. Such SPI efforts thus tend to view the design of software processes as separate from their use. In this approach process designers are expected to provide process knowledge to software developers, and software developers are expected to provide experiences and problems to the process designers. This focus on software processes as artifacts implies an emphasis on formalization and externalization of process models possibly at the expense of the process knowledge in the heads of the process users.

References
  1. Brodman, J. , & Johnson, D. (1997). A software process improvement approach for small organizations and small projects. Paper presented at the International Conference on Software Engineering, Boston, MA.
  2. Coallier, F. , Mayrand, J. , & Lague, B. (1999). Risk Management in Software Product Procurement. In K. Emam. & N. Madhavji (Eds. ), Elements of Software Process ssessment and Improvement (pp. 23-44). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer
  3. Dr. Jyotsna Sengupta, Rupinder Kaur, "Software Process Models and Analysis on Failure of Software Development Projects", International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Feb 2011.
  4. M. P. Thapliyal, Pratibha Dwived, "Software Process Improvement in Small and Medium Software Organizations of India", International Journal of Computer Applications, 2010
  5. McFeeley, IDEAL SM: "A User's Guide for Software Process Improvement. Handbook" CMU/SEI- 96-HB-001. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PE, USA.
  6. Donna K. Dunaway, Steve Masters, "CMM SM -Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI): Method Description", April 1996.
  7. Watts S. Humphrey, "Introduction to Software Process Improvement", 1992.
  8. B. Curtis, W. Hefley and S. Miller, People Capability Maturity Model. Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 2001.
  9. B. Franken, How to Explain Six Sigma by Using the Profit Triangle . Retrieved May, 2007 from www. iSixSigma. com/library/content/.
  10. F. Coallier, R. McKenzie, J. F. Wilson and J. Hatz, The Trillium Model, Version 3, Bell Canada, December, 1994.
  11. G. Eckes, The Six Sigma Revolution, How General Electric and Others Turned Process into Profits. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , 2001
  12. McGuire, E. , & Randall, K. (1998). Process improvement competencies for IS professionals. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer Personnel Research, Boston, MA.
  13. M. B. Chrissis, M. D. Konrad, and S. Shrum, CMMI for evelopment: Guidelines for ProcessIntegration and Product Improvement, Third Edition, 2011.
  14. B. P. Gallagher, M. Phillips, K. J. Richter, and S. Shrum, CMMI-ACQ: Guidelines for Improving the Acquisition of Products and Services, 2009.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Software Process improvement models Software engineering Institute SPI