CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Ontology Matching: An Ultimate Solution for Semantic Interoperability in Healthcare

by Olaronke Iroju, Abimbola Soriyan, Ishaya Gambo
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 51 - Number 21
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Olaronke Iroju, Abimbola Soriyan, Ishaya Gambo
10.5120/8325-1707

Olaronke Iroju, Abimbola Soriyan, Ishaya Gambo . Ontology Matching: An Ultimate Solution for Semantic Interoperability in Healthcare. International Journal of Computer Applications. 51, 21 ( August 2012), 7-14. DOI=10.5120/8325-1707

@article{ 10.5120/8325-1707,
author = { Olaronke Iroju, Abimbola Soriyan, Ishaya Gambo },
title = { Ontology Matching: An Ultimate Solution for Semantic Interoperability in Healthcare },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2012 },
volume = { 51 },
number = { 21 },
month = { August },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 7-14 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume51/number21/8325-1707/ },
doi = { 10.5120/8325-1707 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:49:13.385421+05:30
%A Olaronke Iroju
%A Abimbola Soriyan
%A Ishaya Gambo
%T Ontology Matching: An Ultimate Solution for Semantic Interoperability in Healthcare
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 51
%N 21
%P 7-14
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The healthcare domain is a complex domain which lacks a unified terminological set, most especially in clinical cases. As a result of this, the messaging standards employed in the healthcare domain use different terms for the same concept which often results in clinical misinterpretation, knowledge mismanagement, misdiagnosis of the patient's illness or even death. Consequently, the healthcare system is characterized by high error rate and semantic heterogeneity. A lot of efforts have been made to resolve this problem through the use of standards, clinical terminologies, web services as well as the use of achetype. However, these solutions have proved unsuccessful in resolving semantic heterogeneity in healthcare. Ontologies have also been developed to resolve this problem by making explicit the meaning of terms used in healthcare. Ontologies provide a source of shared and precisely defined terms, resulting in interoperability by knowledge sharing and reuse. Unfortunately, the variety of ways that the healthcare domain is conceptualized results in the creation of different ontologies with contradicting or overlapping parts. Thus, the available ontologies also introduce semantic heterogeneity to this domain. An effective solution to this problem is the introduction of methods for finding matches among the various components of ontologies in healthcare in order to facilitate semantic interoperability. Therefore, this paper aims at examining the various attempts for achieving semantic interoperability in healthcare and also motivates the critical needs for ontology matching in healthcare systems.

References
  1. Veli B. , Gokce B. L. , Asuman, D. and Yildiray. , K. 2006. Artemis Message Exchange Framework: Semantic Interoperability of Exchanged Messages in the Healthcare Domain. Software Research and Development Center, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara Turkiye.
  2. Semantic Health Report 2009. Semantic Interoperability for Better Health and Safer Healthcare. European Commission, Informtion Society and Media.
  3. Stefan, S. , Holger, S. , Martin, B. , and Barry S. 2009. Strengths and Limitations Of Formal Ontologies In The Biomedical Domain. Electronic Journal of Communication Information and Innovation in Health. pp. 31-45.
  4. Shvaiko, P. 2006. Iterative Schema-Based Semantic Matching. PhD Dissertation. International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology, University Of Trento.
  5. Trond, A. U. , and Jochen, F. 2008. The Momentum of Open Standards - a Pragmatic Approach to Software Interoperability. European Journal of e-practice. Pp. 1-13
  6. Institute of Electrical And Electronics Engineers 1990. IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries. New York, NY.
  7. Gregory A. S. , Kushel, R. B. , and William, Y. 2009. Supporting Interoperability Using the Discrete-Event Modeling Ontology (Demo). Proceedings of The 2009 Winter Simulation Conference M. D. Rossetti, R. R. Hill, B. Johansson, A. Dunkin And R. G. Ingalls, Eds.
  8. Kalra,D. 2008. Getting The Right Level Of Semantic Interoperability For Now. Centre For Health Informatics and Multi-professional Education (CHIME). University College London.
  9. Beale, T. , Heard M. D 2007. An Ontology-based Model of Clinical Information. MEINFO 2007, pp 760-766.
  10. Quinn, J. 2008. Health Information Technology Architecture vs. Semantic Interoperability. One Reason Why Health Information Technology (HIT) Interoperability Standards Can't Achieve the "Vision". Bellagio, Italy.
  11. Datta, G. (2010). HL7 International, Health Level Seven Introduction. Health Level 7 International, USA.
  12. Ozgur, K. and Asuman, D. (2006). Achieving Clinical Statement Interoperability using R-MIM and Archetype-based Semantic Transformations. European Commission and Scientific and Technical Research Council Turkey (TUBITAK).
  13. Semantic Health Report 2007. Semantic Interoperability Deployment and Research Roadmap. European Commission, Information Society and Media.
  14. Nagarajan, M. , Verma, K. , Amit P. S, John, M. and Jon. , L. 2006. Semantic Interoperability of Web Services – Challenges and Experiences. Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia, Athens GA, USA
  15. Hyeoun-Ae. , P, and Nick, H. 2009. Clinical Terminologies: A Solution for Semantic Interoperability. Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics Vol. 15, No 1. , pp 1-11.
  16. Chute. , C. G. 2000. Clinical classification and terminology: Some history and current observations. Journal of Am Medical Information. vol. 7. Pp. 298-303.
  17. Ryan, A. 2007. Towards Semantic Interoperability in Healthcare: Ontology Mapping from SNOMED-CT to HL7 version 3. School of Economics and Information Systems. The University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong.
  18. Waraporn, P. , Meesad, P. and Clayton G. 2010. Proposed Ontology Based Knowledge and Integration Framework. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 30-36.
  19. Kenjige. , P. 2010. Usage of Medical Ontology In EA. PK Technologies.
  20. Costa, A. , Renata, S. S. , Guizzardi, G. , and Jos´e, C. 2004. COReS: Context-Aware, Ontology-Based Recommender System for Service Recommendation. Department of Computer Science, UFES, Vitoria-ES, Brazil, ITC-irst, Trento-Povo, Italy and Laboratory of Applied Ontologies (ISTC-CNR), Trento, Italy.
  21. Bittner, T. ,Donnelly, M and Winter, S. . 2006. Ontology and Semantic Interoperability. Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science (IFOMIS) Saarland University.
  22. Ashiq, A. , Peter, B. , Andrew, B. , Tamás, H. , Richard, M. , Kamran, M. , Dmitry, R. and Jetendr, S. 2007. The Requirements for Ontologies in Medical Data Integration: A Case Study. CCS Research Centre, CEMS Faculty, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Frenchay, Bristol, UK.
  23. Fabozzi, N. 2010. Kaiser's Donation of its Convergent Medical Terminology Dictionary Puts the Spotlight on the Role of Clinical Terminology Services in Driving Meaningful Use of EHRs. Healthcare and Life Sciences, Frost and Sullivan.
  24. Alan, R. 2001. Description Logics in Medical Informatics. School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, England.
  25. Fang, C. , Norm, A. , and Skip, P. 2009. An Agent-based Knowledge Management Framework for Electronic Health Record Interoperability. Journal Of Emerging Technologies In Web Intelligence, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 119-127.
  26. Calin Cenan, Gheorghe Sebestyen, Gavril Saplacan, Dan Radulescu. Ontology-Based Distributed Health Record Management System. Dept. of Computer Science, Technical University of Cluj Napoca.
  27. Bodenreider, O. , Smith, B. , Kumar, A. and Burgun, A. (2004) Investigating Subsumption In DL-Based Terminologies: A Case Study in SNOMED-CT. First International Workshop on Formal Biomedical Knowledge Representation, Pp. 12-20.
  28. Bodenreider, O. 2004. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Research Journal. Vol. 32, No 1; SUPP, pp 267-270.
  29. UMLS 2007. Unified Medical Language System. Bethseda, MD: National Library of Medicine.
  30. Interop 2008. State of the Art Report. Ontology Interoperability. Information Society Technologies.
  31. Rung-Ching, C. , Bo-Ying, L. , and Cho-Tscan, B. 2009. Using Domain Ontology Mapping for Drugs Recommendation. Department Of Information Management, Chaoyang University Of Technology, Taiwan.
  32. Ehrig, M, and Staab, S. 2004. QOM - Quick Ontology Mapping. International Semantic Web Conference. Vol. 3298, pages 683–697.
  33. Katrin, S. Z. 2010. Instance-Based Ontology Matching and the Evaluation of Matching Systems. Inaugural-Dissertation. Department of Computer Science, Heinrich Heine University of Dusseldorf, Germany.
  34. Rahm, E. , and Bernstein, P. 2001. A Survey of Approaches to Automatic Schema Matching. VLDB Journal. Pp 334 – 350.
  35. Puri, C. , Gomadam, K. , Jain, P. , Yeh, P. , and Verma, K. 2011. Multiple Ontologies in Healthcare Information Technology: Motivations and recommendations for Ontology Mapping and Alignments. International Journal of Biomedical Ontologies, Buffalo, New York, USA.
  36. Damon, B. and Jesus, B. (2009). Archetype Alignment: A Two-Level Driven Semantic Matching Approach to Interoperability in the Clinical Domain. TeaPOT: People Oriented Technology Conference Papers, Dublin Institute of Technology.
  37. Wei, C. , Doong, S. , And Sung, S. (2007). On Resolving The Problem Of Semantic Heterogeneity In Clinical Information Systems. Department of Computer Information Systems BMCC, City University of New York, New York, USA.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Ontology ontology matching semantic heterogeneity interoperability semantic interoperability