CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
Reseach Article

Performance Comparison of UDP and UDP-Lite for Different Video Codecs

by Puneet Kaur, Nivit Gill
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 54 - Number 12
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Puneet Kaur, Nivit Gill
10.5120/8617-2479

Puneet Kaur, Nivit Gill . Performance Comparison of UDP and UDP-Lite for Different Video Codecs. International Journal of Computer Applications. 54, 12 ( September 2012), 15-22. DOI=10.5120/8617-2479

@article{ 10.5120/8617-2479,
author = { Puneet Kaur, Nivit Gill },
title = { Performance Comparison of UDP and UDP-Lite for Different Video Codecs },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { September 2012 },
volume = { 54 },
number = { 12 },
month = { September },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 15-22 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume54/number12/8617-2479/ },
doi = { 10.5120/8617-2479 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:55:28.563526+05:30
%A Puneet Kaur
%A Nivit Gill
%T Performance Comparison of UDP and UDP-Lite for Different Video Codecs
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 54
%N 12
%P 15-22
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In recent years, usage of Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs) for communication has grown at a faster rate due to its ease of implementation and flexibility. Also,transmission of multimedia contents over Internet isone of the most widely used technologies being used globally. According to the ongoing trends in technology, most of the contents (data) sent over the Internet are interactive multimedia contents, which prefer to be delivered in error-state than being discarded or arriving late. To avoid network congestion, it is preferred to transmit the data without any overhead of prior connection establishment. A solution to both the problems is to use UDP as transport protocol, which provide no reliability and have low protocol processing overhead. An enhanced version of UDP, called UDP-Lite was also introduced a decade ago, which has been specifically designed for real-time multimedia applications. The aim of this paper is to compare the performances of UDP and UDP-Lite by changing various network parametersfor transmitting various video codecs.

References
  1. Amoolya Singh, Almudena Konrad, Anthony D. Joseph, "Performance evaluation of UDP-lite for cellular video" in proceedings of ACM NOSSDAV, 2001.
  2. Behrouz A. Forouzan, Data Communications and Networking, Second Edition, Tata McGraw-HILL Education Private Limited, 2009.
  3. Carolina Hernández, Álvaro Alesanco, Violeta Abadia, José Gracía, "The Effects of Wireless Channel Errors on the Quality of Real Time Ultrasound Video Transmission" in proceedings of the 28th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference, 2006.
  4. David R. Bull, Edward J. Delp, Seishi Takamura, Thomas Wiegand, Feng Wu, "Introduction to the Issue on Emerging Technologies for Video Compression" IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 1277-1281, November 2011.
  5. Frank Mertz, Ulrich Engelke, Peter Vary, Hervé Taddei, Imre Varga, "Applicability of UDP-Lite for Voice over IP in UMTS Networks" in the proceedings of 16th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2005.
  6. J. Postel, User Datagram Protocol, RFC 768, USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1980. Available: http://tools. ietf. org/html/rfc768.
  7. Jože Mohorko, Matjaž Fras, Žarko ?u?ej, "Real video stream transmission over simulated wireless link" in proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications, 2008.
  8. Kim Andrew, "OPNET Tutorial", TECOMM LAB, March 2003.
  9. Lars-?ke Larzon, Mikael Degermark, Stephen Pink, "Efficient Use of Wireless Bandwidth for Multimedia Applications" in proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Mobile Multimedia Communications, 1999.
  10. Lars-åke Larzon, Mikael Degermark, Stephen Pink, "UDP Lite for Real Time Multimedia Applications" in proceedings of the QOS mini-conference of IEEE International Conference of Communications, 1999.
  11. Lars-?ke Larzon, Mikael Degermark, Stephen Pink, Lars-Erik Jaosson, Godred Fairhurst, The Lightweight User Datagram Protocol (UDP-Lite), Internet proposed standard RFC 3828, July 2004. Available: http://tools. ietf. org/html/rfc3828.
  12. Mohamed M. Abo Ghazala, Mohamed F. Zaghloul, and Mohammed Zahra, "Performance Evaluation of Multimedia Streams Over Wireless Computer Networks (WLANs)" International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, vol. 13, pp. 63-76, December 2009.
  13. Mohammad M. Siddique, Könsgen Andreas, "Advanced Communication Lab OPNET Tutorial", 2006.
  14. "OPNET Modeler Manual," available: http://www. opnet. com.
  15. Regina Reine, Dr. Godred Fairhurst, "MPEG-4 and UDP-lite for Multimedia Transmission" in proceedings of Post Graduate Networking Conference, 2003.
  16. Tay Vaughan, Multimedia: Making it Work, Seventh Edition, Tata McGraw-HILL Education Private Limited, 2008.
  17. W. Richard Stevens, G. Gabrani, TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1 The Protocols, 3rd impression, Pearson Education Inc. , 1994.
  18. Xinjie Chang, "Network Simulations With OPNET" in proceedings of IEEEWinter Simulation Conference, 1999.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANETs UDP UDP-Lite video codecs OPNET Modeler