Call for Paper - March 2023 Edition
IJCA solicits original research papers for the March 2023 Edition. Last date of manuscript submission is February 20, 2023. Read More

Adoption of Latin Square Experimental Design in Minimizing Cheating During Examination

International Journal of Computer Applications
© 2012 by IJCA Journal
Volume 54 - Number 18
Year of Publication: 2012
Kayode Ayinde

Kayode Ayinde. Article: Adoption of Latin Square Experimental Design in Minimizing Cheating During Examination. International Journal of Computer Applications 54(18):5-8, September 2012. Full text available. BibTeX

	author = {Kayode Ayinde},
	title = {Article: Adoption of Latin Square Experimental Design in Minimizing Cheating During Examination},
	journal = {International Journal of Computer Applications},
	year = {2012},
	volume = {54},
	number = {18},
	pages = {5-8},
	month = {September},
	note = {Full text available}


Sitting arrangement of students during examination has been observed as a fundamental factor that can influence or aid cheatings/examination malpractices. This paper therefore proposed and investigated statistically some methods of overcoming the problem of sitting arrangement, and thus reduces examination malpractice especially when examination questions are basically objective. The first method requires dividing the number of questions into groups, such that the first question in each group has all the information needed to answer other questions which may be in the group. The second method requires using the number of different options in a question instead of dividing the number of questions into groups. In each method, a Latin Square Design is then formed from which blocks are randomly chosen, . The order of arrangement in each block is then followed to re-organize the questions/options into different groups/types of questions. The question papers after printing are arranged and parceled such that a question paper from each different group/type of questions is allowed to follow each other. The other proposed method is a combination of the two methods to form a two factor experimental design. Statistical investigations of these methods revealed that the students are not at any disadvantage in term of their performances as a result of different re-arrangements of questions. The methods are thus recommended for usage.


  • Jimoh, B. O. 2009. Examination malpractice in secondary schools in Nigeria: What sustain it? European Journal of Education 1 (3), 101 – 108.
  • Maduka, C. 1993. Examination Malpractice: Causes, Implications and Remedies. Benin City, Amik Press.
  • Balogun, J. O. 1999. Examination Malpractices and the Nigeria Society. The Journal of Education, 4(1), 110- 116.
  • Alutu, A. N. G. and Aluede, O. 2006. Secondary school students' perception of examination malpractices and examination ethics. Journal of Human Ecology, 20(4), 295 – 300.
  • Nwana, O. C. 2000. Aberrations in the Nigerian Education System in the state of education in Nigeria UNESCO, Abuja Office, Nigeria.
  • Odongbo, D. N. 2002. Controlling Examination Malpractice and irregularities; Uganda National Examination Board's Experience. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of AEAA, Arusha, Tanzania.
  • Ruwa, M. 1997. Examination Malpractice. A case study of the University of Maiduguri. Maiduguri Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1), 25 – 30.
  • Abba, A. 1997. The University environment and examination. A paper presented at a seminar on examination ethics held at University of Maiduguri 3rd - 4th September
  • Afolabi, A. 1998. Validity of Public Examination, the Environment and Sustainable Development. Book of readings on education, environment and sustainable national development, Ife social educators, published by Cardinal Crest Ltd.
  • Maduabum, M. A. 1998. Examination Malpractices in Nigeria Education System: Perspectives and Possibilities.
  • Ojerinde, D. 2004. Examination Malpractice in our Educational System - the NECO Experience. A Faculty of Education Lecture delivered at the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife on 23rd February.
  • Jacob, S. and Lar, T. D. 2001. Forms and reasons for examination malpractice: Implication for National Development. Proceeding of the 16th Annual Congress of the Nigeria Academy of Education, 355 – 365.
  • Balogun, J. O. 1999. Examination Malpractices and the Nigeria Society. The Journal of Education, 4(1), 110- 116.
  • Fagbemi, A. 2001. Assessment and Education Malpractices. The Nigeria Academy of Education p. 82 – 100.
  • Afigbo, A. E. 1997. The demon with a thousand faces: Examination malpractices in historical perspectives. The challenge of a collective responsibility, p. 13 -22.
  • Maduabum, M. A. and Maduabum, C. I. 1998. Examination Malpractices and Standards: Reflection on Society, Institution and teacher-related factors.
  • Uwadiae, I. J. 1997. School factors as determinants of examination malpractice in the secondary school mathematics examination in Nigeria. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
  • Obe, E. C. 1998. An appraisal of continuous and national examinations in Nigerian schools. Inaugural Lecture Series, Lagos. University of Lagos Press.
  • Onyechere, I. 1996. Examination ethic handbook. Examination Ethic Project, Lagos, Nigeria.
  • Fagbemi, A. 1998. Assessment and Education Malpractices. Proceeding of the16th Annual Congress of the Nigeria Academy of Education, Jos, p. 82 – 100.
  • Balogun, J. O. 1995. Towards minimizing examination misconducts in the Nigerian School System. A paper presented at a seminar on towards improving the qualities of education in Nigeria. School of Education F. C. E. Panksbin.
  • Alonge, M. S. 2002. Assessment and Examination: The Pathways to educational development. An inaugural Lecture presented at the University of Ado-Ekiti.
  • Olayinka, M. S. 1996. Guidance and Counseling Approaches to Examination Malpractice Lagos. Premier Press.
  • Kolo, Z. N. 1999. Examination Malpractice among secondary students. A paper presented at the first national conference of school of Education, College of Education, Ilorin.