CFP last date
22 April 2024
Call for Paper
May Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming May edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 22 April 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

A Novel Integrated AHP-QFD Model for Software Project Selection under Fuzziness

by Tuli Bakshi, Bijan Sarkar, Subir Kumar Sanyal
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 54 - Number 7
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Tuli Bakshi, Bijan Sarkar, Subir Kumar Sanyal
10.5120/8581-2327

Tuli Bakshi, Bijan Sarkar, Subir Kumar Sanyal . A Novel Integrated AHP-QFD Model for Software Project Selection under Fuzziness. International Journal of Computer Applications. 54, 7 ( September 2012), 36-43. DOI=10.5120/8581-2327

@article{ 10.5120/8581-2327,
author = { Tuli Bakshi, Bijan Sarkar, Subir Kumar Sanyal },
title = { A Novel Integrated AHP-QFD Model for Software Project Selection under Fuzziness },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { September 2012 },
volume = { 54 },
number = { 7 },
month = { September },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 36-43 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume54/number7/8581-2327/ },
doi = { 10.5120/8581-2327 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:55:36.595917+05:30
%A Tuli Bakshi
%A Bijan Sarkar
%A Subir Kumar Sanyal
%T A Novel Integrated AHP-QFD Model for Software Project Selection under Fuzziness
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 54
%N 7
%P 36-43
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Now-a-days software manufacturing companies usually try to capture market share with rapid software development. Actually the development of high quality software products can decrease cost by reducing rework and increasing productivity. For that, reason selection of software projects is an important task. Several factors come into consideration while selection of proper project for a specified job. To deal with this typical situation the current researchers combined the much known AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) with QFD (Quality Function Deployment). Here the AHP method redefined under fuzziness. Then QFD process is applied to identifying and ranking customer's need and translating them into product / service specification. At the last sensitivity analysis has been done to make the process more robust from the characterization of integration of the fuzzy AHP & QFD.

References
  1. C. L. Hwang & K. P. Yoon, "Multiple Attribute Decision Making and Introduction", London, Sage Publication, (1995) pp2.
  2. Bakshi, T. , Sarkar, B. , "MCA based performance evaluation of project selection",Int. J. Of Software Engineering and Applications (IJSEA), Vol. 2, No. 2, April 2011.
  3. Lombera J. T. S. J. , Rojo J. C, "Industrial building design stage based on a system approach to their environmental sustainability", Construction and Building Materials, (2010), Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 438–447.
  4. Lombera J. -T. S. -J. , Aprea I. G, "A system approach to the environmental analysis of industrial buildings", Building and Environment, (2009) Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 673-683.
  5. Juan Y. -K. , Gao P. , Wang I "A hybrid decision support system for sustainable office building renovation and energy performance improvement", Energy and Buildings, (2010), Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 290-297
  6. Morkvenas, R;Bivainis J; Jarzemsks,A, "Assessment of employee's knowledge potential in transport sector", Transport 23(3), (2008), 258-265.
  7. Maskeliunaite, L; Sivilevicius, H; Podvezko, V, "Research on the quality of passenger transportation by railway", Transport 24 (2), . (2009), 100-112.
  8. Saaty T. L, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. Mcgraw-Hill. . (1980), 287p.
  9. Satty T. L. , the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications Pittsburgh. (1996).
  10. Hwang, C. L; Yoon, K. , "Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications", A state of the Art Survey. . (1981), 1st edition. Springer. 259p
  11. Wang, T. C; Lee, H-D. , "Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights", Expert Sustems with Applications, (2009), 36 (5): 8980-8985.
  12. Datta, S. , Beriha, G. S. , Patnaik,B. , Mahapatra, S. S. , "Use of compromise ranking method for supervisor selection: A multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach", International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, . (2009),vol. 1(1),pp. 007-013.
  13. Bskshi, T. ,SinhaRay, A. , Sarkar, B. ,Sanyal, S. K. , " MCDM Based Project Selection by F-AHP & VIKOR", SEMCCO 2011, Part I, LNCS 7076, pp. 381-388,2011, Springer-Verlog Berlin Heidelberg 2011.
  14. Bskshi, T. ,SinhaRay, A. , Sarkar, B. , " Exploratory Analysis of Project Selection through MCDM", ICOQM-10,June 28-30,2011, pp. -128-133.
  15. Bskshi, T. , Sarkar, B. , Sanyal, S. K. , " Vendor Selection in Supply-Chain Environment using Integrated Approach of SOWIA & MOORA", Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Advances in Supply Chain and Manufacturing Management Kharagpur, India, December 16-18,2011.
  16. Zavadskas, E. K. , Kaklauskas, A. , Turskis, Z. , Tamosaitiene, J. , " Selection of the effective dwelling house walls by applying attributes values determined at intervals. " Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, (2008c) ,14 (2), 85-93.
  17. Zavadskas, E. K. , Turskis, Z. , Tamosaitiene, J, Marina , V. , " Multicriteria selection of project managers by applying grey criteria", Technological and Economic Development of Economy, ,(2008d) , 14(4) , 462- 477
  18. Zavadskas, E. K. , Kaklauskas, A. , Turskis, Z. , Tamosaitiene, J, "Multi-attribute decision-making model by applying grey numbers", Informatica, (2009b), 20(2), 305-320
  20. MacCrimon, K. R. , Decision Making Among Multiple- Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach. RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA. The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica , CA,(1968).
  21. Srinivasan, V. , Shocker, A. D. , " Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of privileged", Psychometrika, . ,(1973), 38, 337-369.
  22. Turskis , Z. , Zavadskas , E. K. " A new Fuzzy Additive Ratio Assessment Method ( ARAS-F) . Case Study: The analysis of Fuzzy Multiple Criteria in order to select the logistic centers location" Transport 25(4), (2010), 423-432.
  23. O. Bayazit, B. Karpak, An AHP application in vendor selection, in: ISAHP 2005, Honolulu, Hawaii, July 8–10, 2005, pp. 1–24.
  24. K. S. Bhutta, F. Huq, Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches, Supply Chain Man¬agement: An International Journal 7 (3) (2002) 126–135.
  25. M. Marufuzzaman, K. B. Ahsan, K. Xing, Supplier selection and evaluation method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP): a case study on an apparel manufacturing organization, International Journal of Value Chain Management 3 (2) (2009) 224–240
  26. W. -N. Pi, C. Low, Supplier evaluation and selection via Taguchi loss functions and an AHP, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 27 (5–6) (2006) 625–630.
  27. T. L. Saaty, the Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
  28. T. L. Saaty, Decision Making in Complex Environments: The Analytic Network Process for Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 2001.
  29. F. Tahriri, M. R. Osman, A. Ali, R. M. Yusuff, A. Esfandiary, AHP approach for sup¬plier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 01 (02) (2008) 54–76.
  30. J. Sarkis, S. Talluri, A model for strategic supplier selection, The Journal of Supply Chain Management: A Global Review of Purchasing and Supply (winter) (2002) 18–28.
  31. O. Bayazit, Use of analytic network process in vendor selection decisions, Benchmarking: An International Journal 13 (5) (2006) 566–579.
  32. F. T. S. Chan, Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach, International Journal of Production Research 41 (15) (2003) 3549–3579.
  33. C. Kahraman, U. Cebeci, Z. Ulukan, Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP, Logistics Information Management 16 (6) (2003) 382–394.
  34. M. Y. Bayrak, N. C¸ elebi, H. Tas¸ kin, A fuzzy approach method for supplier selec¬tion, Production Planning & Control 18 (1) (2007) 54–63.
  35. M. Bevilacqua, A. Petroni, From traditional purchasing to supplier manage¬ment: a fuzzy logic-based approach to supplier selection, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 5 (3) (2002) 235–255.
  36. A. F. Guneri, A. Yucel, G. Ayyildiz, An integrated fuzzy-LP approach for a sup¬plier selection problem in supply chain management, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (5) (2009) 9223–9228.
  37. G. Tuzkaya, A. Ozgen, D. Ozgen, U. R. Tuzkaya, Environmental performance evaluation of suppliers: a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 6 (3) (2009) 477–490.
  38. J. Razmi, H. Rafiei, M. Hashemi, Designing a decision support system to eval¬uate and select suppliers using fuzzy analytic network process, Computers & Industrial Engineering 57 (4) (2009) 1282–1290.
  39. Sreekumar, S. S. Mahapatra, A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for supplier selection in supply chain management, African Journal of Business Management 3 (4) (2009) 168–177.
  40. M. Sevkli, S. C. L. Koh, S. Zaim, M. Demirbag, E. Tatoglu, Hybrid analytical hier¬archy process model for supplier selection, Industrial Management & Data Systems 108 (1) (2008) 122–142.
  41. J. -M. Ju, S. -G. Hwang, A study on supplier evaluation and selection method based on dependence, Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics 8 (4) (2004) 415–420.
  42. M. Bevilacqua, F. E. Ciarapica, G. Giacchetta, A fuzzy-QFD approach to supplier selection, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 12 (2006) 14–27.
  44. R. L. Armacost, P. J. Componation, M. A. Mullens, W. W. Swart, An AHP frame¬work for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD: an industrialized housing application, IIE Transactions 26 (4) (1994) 72–79.
  45. A. Bhattacharya, B. Sarkar, S. K. Mukherjee, Integrating AHP with QFD for robot selection under requirement perspective, International Journal of Production Research 43 (17) (2005) 3671–3685.
  46. P. -T. Chuang, Combining the analytic hierarchy process and quality function deployment for a location decision from a requirement perspective, Interna¬tional Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 18 (2001) 842–849.
  47. Nnaji, B. O. and Yannacoupoulou, M. , " A utility theory based robot selection and evaluation for electronics assembly", Comp. Ind. Eng. ,1988,14,477-493.
  48. Winston, W. L. , The analytic hierarchy process. In Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms, edited by B. Wadsworth, pp. 798-806,1994 ( Duxbury Press: Belmont, CA).
  49. Zadeh L. , "Fuzzy sets", information control, vol 8, pp. - 338-53,1965.
  50. Huang C, Chu P, Chiang Y, "A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection" Omega 36 (2008) 1038-1052.
  51. Cheng CH, "Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1999, 107, pp 25-35.
  52. Van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrcyz W , "A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1983,11,pp-229-241.
  53. Da-Yong Chang, "Theory and Methodology Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP", European Journal of Operational Research,(1996),95,649-655.
  54. Hauser, J. R. and Clausing, D. , " The house of quality", Harvard Business Review,1988,66(3),pp. -63-73.
  55. Ertay, T. , "Simulation approach in comparison of a pull system in a cell production system with a push system in a conventional production system according to flexible cost: a case study", International Journal of Production Economics, 1998, 56-57, pp. -145-155.
  56. Chuang, P. T. , "Combining the analytic hierarchy process and quality function deployment for a location decision from a requirement perspective", Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. , 2001, 18,842-849.
  57. Bakshi, T. , Sanyal, S. K. , "A Soft-Computing Approach for Software Project Selection", 2011 International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Systems,978-1-4577-0792-6/11/$26. 00@2011 IEEE, pp. -18-23.
  58. Bhattacharya, A. , Sarkar, B. and Mukherjee, S. K. , "Material handling equipment selection under multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) environment",Ind. Eng. J. , 2002, XXXI (6), 17-25.
  59. Bhattacharya ,A. , Sarkar, B. and Mukherjee, S. K. , "A holistic multi-criteria approach for selecting machining processes", in Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering, Tinos Island, Greece , 2002, Vol. 1,pp. 83-88.
  60. Bhattacharya, A. , Sarkar, B. and Mukherjee, S. K. , "A new method for plant location selection: a holistic approach", Int. J. Ind. Eng. Theory Appl. Prac. , 2004, 11(4) , 330-338.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Quality Function Deployment AHP Fuzziness Project selection

Powered by PhDFocusTM