CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
Reseach Article

Article:Performance Analysis of Proactive and Reactive Transport Protocols using a Proactive Congestion Avoidance Model

by Mohanchur Sarkar, K.K.Shukla, K.S.Dasgupta
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 6 - Number 5
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Mohanchur Sarkar, K.K.Shukla, K.S.Dasgupta
10.5120/1077-1407

Mohanchur Sarkar, K.K.Shukla, K.S.Dasgupta . Article:Performance Analysis of Proactive and Reactive Transport Protocols using a Proactive Congestion Avoidance Model. International Journal of Computer Applications. 6, 5 ( September 2010), 10-17. DOI=10.5120/1077-1407

@article{ 10.5120/1077-1407,
author = { Mohanchur Sarkar, K.K.Shukla, K.S.Dasgupta },
title = { Article:Performance Analysis of Proactive and Reactive Transport Protocols using a Proactive Congestion Avoidance Model },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { September 2010 },
volume = { 6 },
number = { 5 },
month = { September },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 10-17 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume6/number5/1077-1407/ },
doi = { 10.5120/1077-1407 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:54:37.449855+05:30
%A Mohanchur Sarkar
%A K.K.Shukla
%A K.S.Dasgupta
%T Article:Performance Analysis of Proactive and Reactive Transport Protocols using a Proactive Congestion Avoidance Model
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 6
%N 5
%P 10-17
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper attempts to establish the fact that Proactive transport protocols are better than conventional Reactive transport protocols in terms of overall utilization of resources. This has been proved analytically in this paper using a mathematical model developed for proactive congestion avoidance. The paper also provides a mathematical framework for Proactive Transport Protocol and predicts the congestion window evolution and throughput achieved by single and multiple proactive TCP flows. The congestion window evolution and throughput of a Proactive TCP connection are modeled as functions of the bandwidth, delay, packet size, number of concurrent TCP flows and the penalty factor used by the proactive protocols. Results obtained from the model are verified with ns2 simulation. The optimal value of the penalty factor is derived mathematically from the designed model. It has also been shown how the derived optimal values enhances the performance of the protocol and almost a near maximum utilization of resources is achieved by extensive simulation in ns2 considering both single and multiple TCP flows.

References
  1. Mohanchur Sarkar, K.K.Shukla, K.S.Dasgupta. 2010. A Proactive Transport Protocol for Performance Enhancement of Satellite based Network. (IJCA) International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol 1, Number16, pp. 114-121
  2. Jiang Wu, Hosam El-Ocla. 2004. TCP Congestion Avoidance Model with Congestive Loss. Proceedings 12th IEEE International Conference.Vol 1, pp. 3-8
  3. Ian F. Akyildiz, Giacomo Morabito, Sergio Palazzo. 2001. TCP-Peach: A New Congestion Control Scheme for Satellite IP Networks. IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, VOL. 9, NO. 3, JUNE
  4. Ian F. Akyildiz, Xin Zhang, Jian Fang. 2002. TCP-Peach+: Enhancement of TCP-Peach for Satellite IP Networks. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, VOL. 6, NO. 7, JULY
  5. Ozgur B. Akan, Jian Fang, Ian F. Akyildiz. 2004. TP-Planet: A Reliable Transport Protocol for InterPlaNetary Internet. IEEE/SAC, vol 22, no 2, Feb. 2004, pp 348-61
  6. L. S. Brakmo, S. O Malley, L. L. Peterson. 1994. TCP Vegas: New Techniques for Congestion Detection and Avoidance. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, pp. 24-35, October
  7. Mathis, M., J. Mahdavi, S.Floyd, and A.Romanow. 1996. TCP Selective Acknowledgment Options. RFC 2018, April
  8. J. Padhye, V. Firoio, D. Towsley, J. Kurose. 2000. Modeling TCP Reno Performance: A Simple Model and Its Empirical Validation. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 133-145, April
  9. M. Mathis, J. Mahdavi. 1996. Forward Acknowledgment: Refining TCP Congestion Control. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 1996, pp. 281-292, Aug.
  10. S.C. Tsao, Y.C. Lai, and Y.D. Lin. 2007. Taxonomy and Evaluation of TCP-Friendly Congestion-Control Schemes on Fairness, Aggressiveness, and Responsiveness. IEEE Network, November
  11. R. Jain, D. Chiu, and W. Hawed. 1984. A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination for resource allocation in shared computer systems. DEC, Res. Rep.TR-301
  12. UCB/LBNL/VINT Network Simulator [Online]. Available: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

GEO ns2 Proactive TCP SACK Vegas Multiple Flow Model