CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

SVM based Signature Verification by Fusing Global and Functional Features

by Biswajit Kar, Pranab K. Dutta
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 60 - Number 16
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Biswajit Kar, Pranab K. Dutta
10.5120/9778-4359

Biswajit Kar, Pranab K. Dutta . SVM based Signature Verification by Fusing Global and Functional Features. International Journal of Computer Applications. 60, 16 ( December 2012), 34-39. DOI=10.5120/9778-4359

@article{ 10.5120/9778-4359,
author = { Biswajit Kar, Pranab K. Dutta },
title = { SVM based Signature Verification by Fusing Global and Functional Features },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { December 2012 },
volume = { 60 },
number = { 16 },
month = { December },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 34-39 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume60/number16/9778-4359/ },
doi = { 10.5120/9778-4359 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:07:09.363663+05:30
%A Biswajit Kar
%A Pranab K. Dutta
%T SVM based Signature Verification by Fusing Global and Functional Features
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 60
%N 16
%P 34-39
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

On-line signature verification can be used in real time applications like credit card transactions or resource accesses because of its popularity in regular authentication. In signature verification number of signatures avalible to train a model is very limited, and therefore identification of the most suitable features which characterize the class is critical. Therefore feature selection is essential to minimize the classification error. The mRMR (minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance) method is applied to select the features. Verification is based on global features and scores from functional features. The scores are generated by comparing the functional features of the test signature with the corresponding reference features. These scores are treated as additional features in a two-class classification problem solved with the ANN and SVM. Verification accuracy is enhanced by fusion of user specific global and functional features. The methods are tested with the database of SVC2004.

References
  1. Jain, Anil K. , Griess, Friederike D. and Connell, Scott D. 2002. On-line signature verification, Pattern Recognition, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2963 – 2972.
  2. Herbst, N. M. and Liu, C. N. 1977. Automatic signature verification based on accelerometry, IBM J. Res. Dev. , vol. 21, pp. 245–253.
  3. Impedovo, D. and Pirlo, G. 2008. Automatic signature verification: The state of the art, IEEE Trans. Syst. , Man, Cybern. C, Appl. Rev. , vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 609–635.
  4. Leclerc, F. and Plamondon, R. 1994. Automatic signature verification: the state of the art—1989–1993, Int. J. Pattern Recognition Artif. Intel. , vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 643–660.
  5. Plamondon, R. and Lorette, G. 1989. Automatic signature verification and writer identification—the state of the art, Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 107–131.
  6. Sabourin, R. , Genset, G. and Preteux, F. 1997. Off-Line Signature Verification by Local Granulometric Size Distribution, IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 976-988.
  7. Aguilar, J. F. , Krawczyk, S. , Garcia, J. O. and Jain, A. K. 2005. Fusion of Local and Regional Approaches for On-Line Signature Verification, Proc. Int'l Workshop Biometric Recognition System, pp. 188-196.
  8. Bajaj. R. and Chaudhary, S. 1997. Signature Verification Using Multiple Neural Classifiers, Pattern Recognition, vol. 30, pp. 1-87.
  9. Van, B. Ly, Garcia-Salicatti, S. and Dorizzi, B. 2007 On using the Viterbi path along with HMM likelihood information for online signature verification, IEEE Trans. Syst. , Man, Cybern. B, Cybern. , vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1237–1247.
  10. Alister, K. and Yanikoglu, B. 2005. Identity Authentication Using Improved On-Line Signature Verification Method, PRL, vol. 26, no. 18, pp. 2400-2408.
  11. Justino, E. J. R. , Bortolozzi, F. and Sabourin, R. 2005. A comparison of SVM and HMM classifiers in the offline signature verification, PRL, vol. 26, pp. 1377–1385.
  12. Feng, H. and Wah, C. C. 2003. Online signature verification using a new extreme points warping technique, PRL vol. 24, pp. 2943–2951.
  13. Munich, M. E. and Perona, P. 2003. Visual identification by signature tracking, IEEE Trans. PAMI, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 200– 217.
  14. Fang, P. , Wu, Z. , Shen, F. , Ge, Y. and Fang, B. 2005. Improved DTW algorithm for online signature verification based on writing forces, in Proc. ICIC—Part I, vol. 3844, Berlin, Germany, pp. 631–640.
  15. Kholmatov A. and Yanikoglu, B. 2005. Identity authentication using improved online signature verification method, PRL, vol. 26, no. 15, pp. 2400–2408.
  16. Faúndez-Zanuy, M. 2007. On-line signature recognition based on VQ-DTW, Pattern Recognition, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 981–992.
  17. Lei, H. and Govindaraju, V. 2005. A comparative study on the consistency of features in on-line signature verification, PRL vol. 26, no. 15, pp. 2483-2489.
  18. Yeung, D. , Chang, H. , Xiong, Y. , George, S. , Kashi, R. , Matsumoto, T. and Rigoll, G. 2004. SVC 2004: First international signature verification competition, in Proc. ICBA, vol. 3072, LNCS, D. Zhang and A. K. Jain, Eds. , Berlin, Germany, 2004, pp. 16–22. [Online]. Available: http://www. cse. ust. hk/svc2004/ results. html
  19. Zhang, K. , Pratikakis, I. , Cornelis, J. and Nyssen, E. 2000. Using landmarks to establish a point-to-point correspondence between signatures, Pattern Anal. Appl. , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 69–75.
  20. Nalwa, V. S. 1997. Automatic On-line Signature Verification, in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 85, pp. 215-239.
  21. Martens, R. and Claesen, L. 1998. Incorporating local consistency information into the online signature verification process, Int. J. Doc. Anal. Recognit. (IJDAR), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 110–115.
  22. Peng, H. , Long, F. , and Ding, C. 2005. Feature selection based on mutual information: Criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy, IEEE Trans. PAMI, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1226-1238.
  23. Duda, R. O. , Hart, P. E. and Stork, D. G. 2006. Pattern Classification, Wiley India Edition, 2nd Edition.
  24. Ding, C. and Peng, H. C. 2003. Minimum Redundancy Feature Selection from Microarray Gene Expression Data, Proc. of second IEEE CSBC, pp. 523?528.
  25. Vapnik, V. 1995. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer Verlag, New York.
  26. Kantardzic, M. 2011. Data Mining: Concepts, Models, Methods, and Algorithms- 2nd edition John Wiley and sons.
  27. Cortes, C. and Vapnik, V. 1995. Support vector networks. Machine Learning, 20:273 – 297.
  28. Bertsekas, D. P. 1999. Nonlinear Programming, 2nd ed. Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific.
  29. Scholkopf, B. and Smola, A. J. 2002. Learning with Kernels, MIT Press.
  30. Chang, C. C. and Lin, C. J. 2001. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines, Tech. Rep. , [Available]. Online: http://www. csie. ntu. edu. tw/»cjlin/libsvm.
  31. Fan, R. E. , Chen, P. H. and Lin, C. J. 2005. Working set selection using the second order information for training svm, Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1889-1918.
  32. MATLAB, User's Guide, The MathWorks, Inc. , 1994-2009, Version 7. 7. 0. 471 (R2008b) http://www. mathworks. com.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Support vector machine On-line signature verification Feature selection mRMR